Journal of Philosophical Logic

, Volume 30, Issue 4, pp 329–354 | Cite as

Truth Via Anaphorically Unrestricted Quantifiers

  • Jody Azzouni

Abstract

A new approach to truth is offered which dispenses with the truth predicate, and replaces it with a special kind of quantifier which simultaneously binds variables in sentential and nominal positions. The resulting theory of truth for a (first-order) language is shown to be able to handle blind truth ascriptions, and is shown to be compatible with a characterization of the semantic and syntactic principles governing that language. Comparisons with other approaches to truth are drawn. An axiomatization of AU-quantifiers and a model theory for them is given, and an appendix contains a completeness proof.

truth Alfred Tarski Deflationism blind ascriptions anaphora semantic rules axioms completeness 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. Azzouni, J. 1994: Metaphysical Myths, Mathematical Practice: The Epistemology and the Ontology of the Exact Sciences, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  2. Azzouni, J. 1999: Comments on Shapiro, J. Philos. 97, 541–544.Google Scholar
  3. Azzouni, J. 2000: Knowledge and Reference in Empirical Science, Routledge, London.Google Scholar
  4. Blackburn, S. and Simmons, K. 1999: Introduction, in S. Blackburn and K. Simmons (eds), Truth, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 1–28.Google Scholar
  5. David, M. 1994: Correspondence and Disquotation, Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  6. Earman, J. 1995: Bangs, Crunches, Whimpers, and Shrieks, Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  7. Field, H. 1972: Tarski's theory of truth, J. Philos. 69, 347–375.Google Scholar
  8. Field, H. 1994: Deflationist views of meaning and content, Mind 103(411), 249–285.Google Scholar
  9. Gupta, A. 1993: Minimalism, Philosophical Perspectives 7, 359–369.Google Scholar
  10. Halbach, V. 1999: Disquotationalism and infinite conjunctions, Mind 108(429), 1–22.Google Scholar
  11. Heck, R. G. Jr. 1997: Tarski, truth and semantics, Philos. Review 106(4).Google Scholar
  12. Horwich, P. 1998: Truth, 2nd edn, Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  13. Katz, J. J. 1972: Semantic Theory, Harper & Row, New York.Google Scholar
  14. Ketland, J. 1999: Deflationism and Tarski's paradise, Mind 108(429), 69–94.Google Scholar
  15. Kripke, S. 1976: Is there a problem about substitutional quantification?, in G. Evans and J. McDowell (eds), Meaning and Truth, Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  16. McGee, V. 1993: A semantic conception of truth?, Philos. Topics 21, 83–111.Google Scholar
  17. Quine, W. V. 1970: Philosophy of Logic, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.Google Scholar
  18. Richard, M. 1996: Propositional quantification, in B. J. Copeland (ed.), Logic and Reality: Essays on the Legacy of Arthur Prior, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 437–460.Google Scholar
  19. Shapiro, S. 1998: Proof and truth: Through thick and thin, J. Philos. 95(10), 493–521.Google Scholar
  20. Simmons, K. 1999: Deflationary truth and the liar, J. Philos. Logic 28(5), 455–488.Google Scholar
  21. Smith, G. 1998: Newton's study of fluid mechanics, Internat. J. Eng. Sci. 36, 1377–1390.Google Scholar
  22. Soames, S. 1997: The truth about deflationism, in E. Villanueva (ed.), Philosophical Issues 8.Google Scholar
  23. Soames, S. 1999: Understanding Truth, Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  24. Tarski, A. 1932: The concept of truth in formalized languages, in J. Corcoran (ed.), Logic, Semantics, Metamathematics (1983), Hackett Publishing Company, Inc., Indianapolis, IN.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jody Azzouni
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Philosophy Tufts UniversityU.S.A

Personalised recommendations