Euphytica

, Volume 122, Issue 3, pp 551–563

Participatory plant breeding with maize in Mexico and Honduras

  • Margaret E. Smith
  • Fernando G. Castillo
  • Francisco Gómez
Article

Abstract

Maize is a staple food crop in many developing countries. However, if seven major maize producing countries are excluded from this group, data indicate that only 34% of the maize area is planted with improved seed despite considerable effort invested in maize breeding. This has led researchers to investigate other options, such as farmer-participatory plant breeding, for delivering the benefits of plant breeding knowledge and technology to farmers in developing countries. This paper describes short-term results from participatory maize breeding studies in Mexico and Honduras. Results from three selection cycles in Mexico suggest that stratified mass selection without pollination control, with selections carried out by researchers in farmers' fields, may be effective at improving yield in farmers' local varieties. In Honduras, mass selection with pollination control, where selections were done by collaborating farmers in their own fields on their own varieties, showed trends (non-significant) towards yield improvement. Farmer selection seemed to offer the greatest yield benefit over experiment station selection on the farm with the lowest yield potential, suggesting that farmer-participatory approaches may be most advantageous in marginal environments where experiment station conditions differ most dramatically from farmers' conditions. These studies highlighted the importance of seed systems knowledge in designing participatory plant breeding programs. For cross-pollinated crops, they also highlighted the need to balance progress from selection and demands on farmers' time and labor in choosing breeding methods. Further work is needed to investigate farmer-participatory breeding approaches that can address post-harvest traits.

maize mass selection participatory plant breeding Zea mays L. 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bänziger, M., G.O. Edmeades & H.R. Lafitte,1999.Selection for drought tolerance increasesmaize yields across a range of nitrogen levels.Crop Sci39:1035–1040.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bellon, M.R. & S.B. Brush,1994.Keepers of maize in Chiapas, Mexico.Economic Botany48:196–209.Google Scholar
  3. Bentley, J.W. & W. Melara,1991.Experimenting with Honduran farmer-experimenters.ODI Newsletter24:31–48.Google Scholar
  4. Bye, R. & C.O. Qualset, 1994. Conservation of Genetic Diversity and Improvement of Crop Production in Mexico: AFarmer-Based Approach. A Proposal to the McKnight Foundation Collaborative Crop Research Program.Google Scholar
  5. CIMMYT,1992. 1991–92 CIMMYT World Maize Facts and Trends: Maize Research Investment and Impacts in Developing Countries.CIMMYT, Mexico, DF.Google Scholar
  6. CIMMYT, 1994. CIMMYT 1993/1994 World Maize Facts and Trends.Maize Seed Industries, Revisited: Emerging Roles of the Public and Private Sectors.CIMMYT, Mexico, DF.Google Scholar
  7. CIMMYT,1999. CIMMYT 1997/1998 World Maize Facts and Trends; Maize Production in Drought-Stressed Environments: Technical Options and Research Resource Allocation.CIMMYT, Mexico, DF.Google Scholar
  8. Echeverría, R.G., 1990. Inversiones PÚblicas yPrivadas en la Investigación Sobre Maíz en Mexico y Guatemala, Economics Program, CIMMYT, Mexico, DF.Google Scholar
  9. Edmeades, G.O., M. Bänziger, J. Bolaños, S.C. Chapman, A. Ortega C., H.R. Lafitte, K.S. Fischer & S. Pandey,1997. Recurrent selection under managed drought stress improved grain yields in tropical maize. In: G.O. Edmeades, M. Bänziger, H.R. Mickelson & C.B. Peña-Valdivia (Eds.), Developing Drought-and Low N-Tolerant Maize.Proceedings of a Symposium, March 25–29, 1996,CIMMYT, Mexico, DF.Google Scholar
  10. FAO, 1998. Food Balance Sheets, 1998.Downloaded on 14 December 2000 from http: //app.fao.org/page/collections?subset=nutritionGoogle Scholar
  11. Flores L.,E.D., 1998.Validación de la Metodología y Evaluación de la Ganancia Genética en Maíces Criollos Mediante Fitomejoramiento Participativo.Ing. Agr. Thesis, Escuela Agrícola Panamericana.Google Scholar
  12. García M.R., D.G. García & H.R. Montero,1990.Notas SobreMercados y Comercialización de Productos Agropecuarios,Colegio de Postgraduados, Montecillos, Mexico.Google Scholar
  13. García S., M.R., 1997. Mejoramiento y Conservación de Maíces Criollos con Pequeños Agricultores.Ing AgrThesis, Escuela Agrícola Panamericana.Google Scholar
  14. Gardner, C.O., 1961. An evaluation of the effects of mass selection and seedirradiation with thermal neutrons on yield of corn. Crop Sci1:241–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. INEGI, 1993.Anuario Estadístico delos Estados Unidos Mexicanos, INEGI, Mexico, DF.Google Scholar
  16. López-Pereira, M.A. & J.C. Garcia,1997. The MaizeSeed Industries of Brazil andMexico: Past Performance, Current Issues, and Future Prospects. CIMMYT Economics Working Paper97–02. CIMMYT, Mexico, DF.Google Scholar
  17. Louette, D. & M. Smale,1998.Farmers' seed selection practices andmaize variety characteristics in a traditional Mexican community. Economics Working Paper98–04.CIMMYT, Mexico, DF.Google Scholar
  18. Louette, D., A. Charrier & J. Berthaud,1997. In situ conservation of maize in Mexico: Genetic diversity andmaize seed management in a traditional community. Economic Botany51:20–38.Google Scholar
  19. Morris, M.L.,C. Clancy & M.A. López-Pereira,1992.Maize research investment and impacts in developing countries.Part 1 of 1991–92 CIMMYT World Maize Facts and Trends: Maize Research Investment and Impacts in Developing Countries. CIMMYT, Mexico, DF.Google Scholar
  20. Reconco E., R.R., 1994.Mejoramiento de Maíz en fincas de Pequeños Agricultores. Ing Agr Thesis, EscuelaAgrícola Panamericana.Google Scholar
  21. Rice, E.B., M. Smale & J.-L. Blanco,1998.Farmers' use of improved seed selectionpractices in Mexican maize: Evidence and issues from the Sierra de Santa Marta.World Development26: 1625–1640.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Romero P., E., 1993.El frijol y la alimentación. In: C.P. González & T.F. Torres (Eds.), Los Retos de laSoberanía Alimenticia en Mexico, pp. 53–67.Instituto de Investigaciónes Económicas, UNAM, Mexico.Google Scholar
  23. Smale, M.,1994. 'Maize is life': Malawi's delayed Green Revolution. World Development 23:819–831.Google Scholar
  24. Smith, M.E. & R.L. Paliwal, 1997.Contributions of genetic resources and biotechnology to sustainable productivity increases in maize. In: K.N. Watanabe & E. Pehu (Eds.), Plant Biotechnology and Plant Genetic Resources for Sustainability and Productivity, pp.133–144. R.G. Landes Company, Austin, TX.Google Scholar
  25. Sperling, L., U. Scheidegger & R. Buruchara,1996.Designing seed systems with small farmers: Principles derived from bean research in the Great Lakes Region of Africa.Agricultural Research and Extension Network Paper No.60. Overseas Development Agency, London, England.Google Scholar
  26. Soleri, D., S.E. Smith & D.A. Cleveland,2000.Evaluating the potential for farmer andplant breeder collaboration: A case study of farmer maize selection in Oaxaca, Mexico.Euphytica116: 41–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Weltzien, E./ Smith, M.E., L.S. Meitzner & L. Sperling,1999.Technical and Institutional Issues in Participatory PlantBreeding - Done from the Perspective of Formal Plant Breeding.A Global Analysis of Issues, Results, and Current Experience.CGIAR Systemwide Program on Participatory Research and Gender Analysis.CIAT, Cali, Colombia.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Margaret E. Smith
    • 1
  • Fernando G. Castillo
    • 2
  • Francisco Gómez
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Plant BreedingCornell UniversityIthacaU.S.A.
  2. 2.Genética, IRGPTexcocoMexico
  3. 3.Dole CorporationCholutecaHonduras

Personalised recommendations