Plant Ecology

, Volume 153, Issue 1–2, pp 153–167 | Cite as

The influence of anthropogenic disturbances on the structure of arboreal arthropod communities

  • Andreas Floren
  • K. Eduard Linsenmair


In the framework of our research, aimed at understanding the processes structuring tropical arthropod communities, we investigated the changes occurring in tree crown communities of forests of different disturbance levels. These were a mixed dipterocarp primary lowland rain forest in Kinabalu National Park (in Sabah, Malaysia) and, some kilometres away, three forests of regeneration periods 5, 15, and 40 years following a clear-cut. These disturbed forest sites were adjacent to one another and merged into mature forest. From each forest at least ten individuals of one tree species were sampled using the fogging method. In the primary forest relative proportions of some arthropod taxa differed on the ordinal and familial level significantly within trees. The dominance of Formicidae was characteristic as was the almost complete lack of less mobile arthropods such as Lepidoptera larvae. In the five-year- old forest, differences in relative proportions among most taxa had almost disappeared. Formicidae abundances had declined drastically which coincided with an increase of Lepidoptera larvae. With progressing forest succession, arthropod communities increasingly converged on the pattern of primary forest, and total ant abundance as well as diversity increased significantly. Ant communities in the most disturbed forest were of low structural complexity, and to a large degree predictable in species arrangement, but became more and more unpredictable as the complexity of the forest increased. Several species of Coleoptera and non-formicine Hymenoptera occurred in high numbers in the youngest forest, contrasting with the mature forest where all species were typically rare. These changes may indicate a change in the structuring mechanisms from predominantly deterministic processes in disturbed forests to stochastic processes in mature forest.

Canopy fogging Community structuring mechanisms Formicidae Secondary forests Stochastic/Deterministic Tropical rain forest 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Adis, J., Basset, Y., Floren, A., Hammond, P. M. & Linsenmair, K. E. 1998. Canopy fogging of an overstorey tree-Recommendations for standardisation. Ecotropica 4: 93–97.Google Scholar
  2. Bascompte, J. & Sole, R. V. 1995. Rethinking complexity: modelling spatiotemporal dynamics in ecology. Trends Ecol. Evol. 10: 361–366.Google Scholar
  3. Bignell, N. C. 1996. The diversity, abundance and biomass of termites under differing levels of disturbance in the Mbalmayo forest reserve, southern Cameroon. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. London. B 351: 51–68.Google Scholar
  4. Burbidge, A. H., Leicester, K., McDavitt, S. & Majer, J. D. 1992. Ants as indicators of disturbance at Yanchep National Park, Western Australia. J. R. Soc. West. Austr. 75: 89–95.Google Scholar
  5. Chesson, P. L. & Case, T. J. 1986. Overview: non-equilibrium community theories: chance, variability, history, and coexistence. Pp. 229–239. In: Diamond, J. & Case, T. J. (eds), Community ecology. Harper and Row, New York.Google Scholar
  6. Daily, G. C. & Ehrlich, P. R. 1995. Preservation of biodiversity in small rainforest patches: rapid evaluations using butterfly trapping. Biod. Cons. 4: 35–55.Google Scholar
  7. Davidson, D. W. 1997. The role of resource imbalances in the evolutionary ecology of tropical arboreal ants. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 61: 153–181.Google Scholar
  8. Davis, A. J. & Sutton, S. L. 1998. The effects of rainforest canopy loss on arboreal dung beetles in Borneo: implications for the measurement of biodiversity in derived tropical ecosystems. Diversity Distrib. 4: 167–173.Google Scholar
  9. Eggleton, P., Bignell, D. E., Sands, W. A., Mawdsley, N. A., Lawton, J. H., Wood, T. G. Dupuy, J. M. & Chazdon, R. L. 1998. Long-term effects of forest regrowth and selective logging on the seed bank of tropical forests in NE Costa Rica. Biotropica 30: 223–237.Google Scholar
  10. Floren, A. & Linsenmair, K. E. 1997. Diversity and recolonisation dynamics of selected arthropod groups on different tree species in a lowland rain forest in Sabah, Malaysia with special reference to Formicidae. Pp. 344–382. In: Stork, N. E., Adis, A. J. & Didham, R. K. (eds), Canopy arthropods. Chapman & Hall, London.Google Scholar
  11. Floren, A. & Linsenmair, K. E. 1998a. Non-equilibrium communities of Coleoptera in trees in a lowland rain forest of Borneo. Ecotropica 4: 55–67.Google Scholar
  12. Floren, A. & Linsenmair, K. E. 1998b. Diversity and recolonisation of arboreal Formicidae and Coleoptera in a lowland rain forest in Sabah, Malaysia. Selbyana 19 (2): 155–161.Google Scholar
  13. Floren, A. & Linsenmair, K. E. 2000. Do ant mosaics exist in pristine lowland rain forest? Oecologia, Oecologia 123: 129–137.Google Scholar
  14. Floren, A., Linsenmair, K. E. & Biun, A. 1998. A very mixed bag. Insect diversity in Sabah's lowland forest. Malayan Naturalist 52 (2): 26–29.Google Scholar
  15. Giller, P. S. 1984. Community structure and the niche. Chapman and Hall, London.Google Scholar
  16. Gotelli, N. J. & Graves, G. R. 1996. Null models in ecology. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, London.Google Scholar
  17. Götzke, A. & Linsenmair, K. E. 1996. Does beta-diversity allow reliable discrimination between deterministically and stochastically assembled communities? Ecotropica 2: 79–82.Google Scholar
  18. Grassle, J. F. & Smith, W. 1976. A similarity measure sensitive to the contribution of rare species and its use in investigation of variation in marine benthic communities. Oecologia 25: 13–22.Google Scholar
  19. Horstmann, K., Floren, A. & Linsenmair, K. E. 1999. High speciesrichness of Ichneumonidae from the canopy of a Malaysian rain forest. Ecotropica 5 (1): 1–12.Google Scholar
  20. Huston, M. A. 1994. Biological diversity. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  21. Hölldobler, B. & Wilson, E. O. 1990. The ants. The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
  22. Hölldobler, B. & Lumsden, C. J. 1980. Territorial strategies in ants. Science 210: 732–739.Google Scholar
  23. Holloway J. D. 1998. The impact of traditional and modern cultivation practices, including forestry, on Lepidoptera diversity in Malaysia and Indonesia. Pp. 567–598. In: Newbery, D.M., Prins, H. H. & Brown, N. D. (eds), Dynamics of tropical communities. Blackwell Science, Oxford.Google Scholar
  24. Jackson, D. A. 1984. Ant distribution patterns in a Cameronian cocoa plantation: investigation of the ant mosaic hypothesis. Oecologia 62: 318–324.Google Scholar
  25. Jullien, M. & Thiollay, J.-M. 1996. Effects of rain forest disturbance and fragmentation: comparative changes of the raptor commu-165 nity along natural and human-made gradients in French Guiana. J. Biogeogr. 23: 7–25.Google Scholar
  26. Lambert, F.R: 1992. The consequences of selective logging for Bornean lowland forest birds. Phil.Trans. R. Soc. London 335: 443–457.Google Scholar
  27. Laurance, W. F. 1994. Rainforest fragmentation and the structure of small mammal communities in tropical Queensland. Biol. Cons. 69: 23–32.Google Scholar
  28. Lawton, J. H., Bignell, D. E., Bolton, B., Bloemers, G. F., Eggelton, P., Hammond, P. M., Hodda, M., Holt, R. D., Larsen, T. B., Mawdsley, N. A., Stork, N. E., Srivastava, D. S. & Watt, A. D. 1998. Biodiversity inventories, indicator taxa and effects of habitat modification in tropical forest. Nature 391: 72–75.Google Scholar
  29. Lehmacher, W., Wassmer, G. & Reitmeir, P. 1991. Procedures for two-sample comparisons with multiple endpoints controlling the experimentwise error rate. Biometrics 47: 511–521.Google Scholar
  30. Leigh, E. G., Wright, S. J., Herre, E. A. & Putz, F. E. 1993. The decline of tree diversity on newly isolated tropical islands: a test of a null hypothesis and some implications. Evol. Ecol. 7: 76–102.Google Scholar
  31. Leston, D. 1973. Leston D (1973) The ant mosaic-tropical tree crops and the limiting of pests and diseases. PANS 19: 311–341.Google Scholar
  32. Magurran, A. E. 1988 Ecological diversity and its measurement. Chapman & Hall, London.Google Scholar
  33. Majer, J. D. 1993. Comparison of the arboreal ant mosaic in Gahna, Brazil, Papua New Guinea and Australia-its structure and influence on arthropod diversity. Pp. 115–141. In: Salle, J. L. & Gauld, J. D. (eds), Hymenoptera and biodiversity. CAB International, Bristol.Google Scholar
  34. Olson, D. M. & Andriamiadana, A. 1996. The effects of selective logging on the leaf litter invertebrate community of a tropical forest in western Madagascar. Primate Report 46: 175–187.Google Scholar
  35. Pahl-Wostl, C. 1997. The dynamic nature of ecosystems. JohnWiley & Sons, New York.Google Scholar
  36. Pimm, S. L. 1991. The balance of nature? The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
  37. Roth, D. S., Perfecto, I. & Rathcke, B. 1994. The effects of management systems on ground-foraging ant diversity in Costa Rica. Ecol. Appl. 4: 423–436.Google Scholar
  38. Schowalter, T. D. 1988. Canopy arthropod community structure and herbivory in old-growth and regenerating forests in western Oregon. Can. J. For. Res. 19: 318–322.Google Scholar
  39. Schowalter, T. D. 1995. Canopy invertebrate community response to disturbance and consequences of herbivory in temperate and tropical forests. Selbyana 16: 41–48.Google Scholar
  40. Schowalter, T. D. & Ganio, L.M. 1999. Invertebrate communities in a tropical rain forest canopy in Puerto Rico following Hurricane Hugo. Ecol. Entomol. 24: 191–201.Google Scholar
  41. Shinozaki, K. 1963. Note on the species-area curve. Proceedings of the 1th Ann. Meet. Ecol. Soc. Japan, Tokyo.Google Scholar
  42. Stork, N. E., Adis, J. & Didham, R. K. (eds) 1997. Canopy arthropods. Chapman & Hall, London.Google Scholar
  43. Tobin, J. E. 1994. Ants as primary consumers: diet and abundance in the Formicidae. Pp. 279–303. In: Hunt, J. H. & Nalepa, C. A. (eds), Nourishment and evolution in insect societies. Westview Press, Oxford.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Andreas Floren
    • 1
  • K. Eduard Linsenmair
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Animal Ecology and Tropical BiologyBiozentrum, Am HublandWuerzburgGermany

Personalised recommendations