An alternative way for testing a student's understanding of theory in a tertiary mathematics course is presented. Two sample questions are provided and advantages and disadvantages of the method are discussed. We argue that the method is an acceptable and flexible means of testing students, and can be adapted to be used in other contexts as well.
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Bowie, L. and Conradie, J.: 1998, 'The three R's: reading, writing and calculus reform', In Proceedings of the International Conference on the Teaching of Mathematics 1998, J Wiley, pp. 56-58.Google Scholar
- Berry, J. and Houston, K.: 1995 Mathematical Modelling, Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
- Cnop, I. and Gransard, F.: 1994, 'An open book exam for non-mathematics majors', International Journal of Mathematics Education in Science and Technology 25 (1), 125-130.Google Scholar
- Haeck, W.: 1994 'Mathematics comprehension: Could you test this?' Conference proceedings, South African Association for Research in Mathematics and Science Education. Google Scholar
- Houston, S.K.: 1989 'The Northern Ireland Further Mathematics Project,' Teaching Mathematics and its Applications 8, 115-121.Google Scholar
- Housston, S.K.: 1993a 'Comprehension Tests in Mathematics,' Teaching Mathematics and its Applications 12, 60-73.Google Scholar
- Houston, S.K.: 1993b 'Comprehension Tests in Mathematics: II,' Teaching Mathematics and its Applications 12, 113-120.Google Scholar