Hydrobiologia

, Volume 422, Issue 0, pp 319–330

Habitat condition and fish assemblage structure in a coastal mediterranean stream (Yarqon, Israel) receiving domestic effluent

  • Sarig Gafny
  • Menachem Goren
  • Avital Gasith
Article

Abstract

The Yarqon stream is the largest urban stream in Israel. In the past 40 y it was severely impacted by human action. Fish kills occur along the polluted sections of the stream almost regularly following winter floods and when poor-quality effluent is discharged into the stream. These events attest to the serious ecological state of the Yarqon stream. We studied the interaction between habitat conditions and fish assemblage structure for four consecutive years. Comparison of certain water quality variables among selected sites along the upper and central stream sections of the Yarqon indicated that the two stream sections differ significantly in electric conductivity and organic load (BOD) but not in temperature and dissolved oxygen. The average species richness and fish abundance in the upper, relatively undisturbed section is significantly higher than in the downstream, upper reach of the central section where domestic effluents enter the stream. In contrast, fish biomass is usually higher in the central stream section. Organic load was the only factor among the four water quality variables measured that significantly correlates with variables of the fish assemblage. A curve fit analysis between organic load and fish species richness and abundance suggests a threshold at ca. 10 mg l-1 BOD, above which most fish species totally avoid polluted habitats. Separate Multi Dimensional Scaling (MDS) analyses of water quality variables and fish assemblages clearly separated between the sites in the upper and the central stream sections. When the result of the fish MDS analysis was graphically superimposed on the result of the water quality MDS analysis, we found a close overlap between the two, suggesting a strong association between water quality and the fish assemblage structure in the Yarqon stream.

urban stream Multi Dimensional Scaling stream pollution BOD 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Adams, M. S., W. D. Crumby, M. S. Greeley Jr., L. R. Shugart & C. F. Saylor, 1992. Response of fish populations and communities to pulp mill effluents: a holistic assessment. Ecotox. Envir. Safety 24: 347–360.Google Scholar
  2. Allen, D. J., 1995. Stream ecology: structure and function of running waters. Chapman & Hall, London: 388 pp.Google Scholar
  3. Angermeier, P. L. & J. R. Karr, 1994. Biological integrity versus biological diversity as policy directives: protecting biotic resources. BioScience 44: 690–697.Google Scholar
  4. APHA, 1995. Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. American Public Health Association: 1268 pp.Google Scholar
  5. Ben-Zvi, A., L. Gvasknecht & B. Azmon, 1995. The hydrology of the Yarqon. In Pargament, D. (ed.), The Yarqon. The Yarqon Stream Authority, Ramat-Gan, Israel: 38–44.Google Scholar
  6. Bernstein, I. H., C. P. Garbin & G. K. Teng, 1988. Applied multivariate analysis. Springer-Verlag, New York: 508 pp.Google Scholar
  7. Diggle, P. J., 1990. Time Series: a Biostatistical Introduction. Clarendon Press, Oxford: 257 pp.Google Scholar
  8. Edds, D. R., 1993. Fish assemblage structure and environmental correlates in Nepal's Gandaki river. Copeia 1993: 48–60.Google Scholar
  9. Gafny, S., M. Goren & A. Gasith, 1997. Effect of habitat conditions on fish biological response in the Yarqon stream. Final project report 123–6. submitted to the Israeli Ministry of the Environment. 68 pp. (In Hebrew).Google Scholar
  10. Gasith, A., 1992. Conservation and management of the coastal streams of Israel: An assessment of stream status and prospect for rehabilitation. In Boon, P. J., P. Calow & G. E. Petts (eds), River Conservation and Management. John Wiley & Sons Ltd., New York: 51–64.Google Scholar
  11. Gasith A. & V. H. Resh, 1999. Streams in mediterranan climates: abiotic and biotic responses to predictable seasonal events. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 30: 51–81.Google Scholar
  12. Gasith, A., M. Bing, Y. Raz & M. Goren, 1998. Fish community parameters as indicators of habitat conditions: The case of the Yarqon, a lowland, polluted stream in a semi-arid region (Israel). Verh. Int. Ver. Limnol. 26: 1023–1026.Google Scholar
  13. Gerritsen, J., 1995. Additive biological indices for resource management. J. n. am. Benthol. Soc. 14: 451–457.Google Scholar
  14. Gore, J. A., 1985. The restoration of rivers and streams, theories and experience. Butterworth Pub., Boston, MA: 280 pp.Google Scholar
  15. Goren, M., 1974. The freshwater fishes of Israel. Israel. J. Zool. 23: 67–118.Google Scholar
  16. Haslam, S. M., 1990. River Pollution: an Ecological Perspective. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, GB: 253 pp.Google Scholar
  17. Herricks, E. E. & L. L. Osborne, 1985. Water quality restoration and protection in streams and rivers. In Gore, J. A. (ed.), The Restoration of Rivers and Streams, Theories and Experience. Butterworth Pub., Boston, MA: 1–20.Google Scholar
  18. Karr, J. R., 1981. Assessment of biotic integrity using fish communities. Fisheries 6: 21–27.Google Scholar
  19. Karr, J. R., L. A. Toth & D. R. Dudley, 1985. Fish communities of midwestern rivers: a history of degradation. BioScience 35: 90–95.Google Scholar
  20. Kauffman, J. B., R. L. Beschta, N. Otting & D. Lytjen, 1997. An ecological perspective of riparian and stream restoration in the western United States. Fisheries 22: 12–24.Google Scholar
  21. Lyons, J., S. Navarro-Perez, P. A. Cochran, A. C. Santana & M. Gusman-Arroyo, 1995. Index of biotic integrity based on fish assemblages for the conservation of streams and rivers in West-Central Mexico. Conservation Biology 9: 569–584.Google Scholar
  22. Matthews, W. J., D. J. Hough & H. W. Robison, 1992. Similarities in fish distribution and water quality patterns in streams of Arkansas: congruence of multivariate analyses. Copeia 1992: 296–305.Google Scholar
  23. Miller, K. L. & 13 co-authors, 1988. Regional application of an index of biotic integrity for use in water resource management. Fisheries 13: 12–38.Google Scholar
  24. Munkittrick, K. R., C. B. Port, G. J. Van Der Kraak, I. R. Smith & D. A. Rokosh, 1991. Impact of bleached kraft mill effluent on population characteristics, liver MFD activity and serum steroid levels of a Lake Superior white sucker (Catostomus ommersoni) population. Can J. Fish. aquat. Sci. 48: 1371–1380.Google Scholar
  25. Naiman, R. J. & Bilby, 1998. River Ecology and Management: Lessons from the Pacific Coastal Ecoregion. Springer-Verlag, New York: 705 pp.Google Scholar
  26. Paller, M. H., M. J. M. Reichert & J. M. Dean, 1996. Use of fish communities to assess environmental impacts in South Carolina coastal plain streams. Trans. am. Fish. Soc. 125: 633–644.Google Scholar
  27. Rosenberg, D. M. & V. H. Resh, 1993. Freshwater Biomonitoring and Benthic Macroinvertebrates. Chapman and Hall, New York: 488 pp.Google Scholar
  28. Scott, M. C. & L. W. Hall, 1997. Fish assemblages as indicators for environmental degradation inMaryland coastal plain streams. Trans. am. Fish. Soc. 126: 349–360.Google Scholar
  29. Servos, M. R., S. Huestis, D. W. Whittle, G. J. Van Der Kraak & K. R. Munkittrick, 1994. Survey of receiving water environmental impacts associated with discharge from pulp mills. III. Polychlorinated dioxins and furans in muscle an liver of white sucker (Catostomus ommersoni), Envir. Toxicol. Chem. 13: 1103–1115.Google Scholar
  30. Sparks, R. E., 1995. Need for ecosystem management of large rivers and their floodplains. BioScience 45: 168–178.Google Scholar
  31. Statsoft, Inc., 1995. Statistics for Windows 5.0. Tulsa, OK.Google Scholar
  32. SYSTAT (for Windows), 1992. Statistics version, 5th edn. Systat Inc., Evanston, IL: 750 pp.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sarig Gafny
    • 1
  • Menachem Goren
    • 2
  • Avital Gasith
    • 3
  1. 1.Institute for Nature Conservation ResearchIsrael
  2. 2.Department of Zoology; George S. Wise Faculty of Life SciencesTel-Aviv UniversityRamat-AvivIsrael
  3. 3.Institute for Nature Conservation ResearchIsrael

Personalised recommendations