, 102:241 | Cite as

How should we explain variation in the genetic variance of traits?

  • David Houle


Recent work has called attention to large differences among traits in the amount of standardized genetic variance they possess. There are four general factors which could play a role in causing this variation: mutation, elimination of deleterious variation, selection of favorable alleles, and balancing selection. Three factors could directly influence the mutational variability of traits: canalization, the mutational target size, and the timing of trait expression. Here I carry out simple tests of the importance of some of these factors using data from Drosophila melanogaster. I compiled information from the literature on the mutational and standing genetic variances in outbred populations, inferred the relative mutational target size of each trait, its a timing of expression, and used models of life history to calculate fitness sensitivities for each trait. Mutation variation seems to play an important role, as it is highly correlated with standing variance. The target size hypothesis was supported by a significant correlation between mutational variance and inferred target size. There was also a significant relationship between the timing of trait expression and mutational variance. These hypotheses are confounded by a correlation between timing and target size. The elimination and canalization hypotheses were not supported by these data, suggesting that they play a quantitatively less important role in determining overall variances. Additional information concerning the pleiotropic consequences of mutations would help to validate the fitness sensitivities used to test the elimination and canalization hypotheses.

genetic variance mutation selection canalization 


  1. Bürger, R., 1993. Predictions of the dynamics of a polygenic character under directional selection. J. Theor. Biol. 162: 487-513.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Crow, J.F., 1979. Minor viability mutants in Drosophila. Genetics 92: s165-s172.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Eanes, W.., C. Wesley, J. Hey, D. Houle & J.W. Ajioka, 1988. The fitness consequences of P element insertion in Drosophila melanogaster. Genet. Res. 52: 17-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Falconer, D.S., 1981. Introduction toQuantitative Genetics, 2nd edn. Longman, London.Google Scholar
  5. García-Dorado, A. & J.A. González, 1996. Stabilizing selection detected for bristle number in Drosophila melanogaster. Evolution 50: 1573-1578.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Houle, D., 1991. Genetic covariance of fitness correlates: what genetic correlations are made of and why it matters. Evolution 45: 630-648.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Houle, D., 1992. Comparing evolvability and variability of quantitative traits. Genetics 130: 195-204.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Houle, D., D.K. Hoffmaster, S. Assimacopoulos & B. Charlesworth, 1992. The genomic mutation rate for fitness in Drosophila. Nature 359: 58-60.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Houle, D., K.A. Hughes, D.K. Hoffmaster, J. Ihara, S. Assimacopoulos, D. Canada & B. Charlesworth, 1994. The effects of spontaneous mutation on quantitative traits. I. Variance and covariance of life history traits. Genetics 138: 773-785.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Houle, D., B. Morikawa & M. Lynch, 1996. Comparing mutational variabilities. Genetics 143: 1467-1483.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Judd, B.H., M.W. Shen & T.C. Kaufman, 1972. The anatomy and function of a segment of the X chromosome of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 71: 139-156.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Kimura, M. & T. Ohta, 1971. Theoretical aspects of population genetics. Princeton University Press, Princeton.Google Scholar
  13. Lai, C., R.F. Lyman, A.F. Long, C.H. Langley & T.F.C. Mackay, 1994. Naturally occurring variation in bristle number and DNA polymorphisms at the scabrous locus of Drosophila melanogaster. Science 266: 1697-1702.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Lande, R., 1977. On comparing coefficients of variation. Syst. Zool. 26: 214-217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lande, R., 1980. Genetic variation and phenotypic evolution during allopatric speciation. Amer. Natur. 116: 463-479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Long, A.D., S.L. Mullaney, L.A. Reid, J.D. Fry, C.H. Langley & T.F.C. Mackay, 1995. High resolution mapping of genetic factors affecting abdominal bristle number in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 139: 1273-1291.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Lyman, R.F., F. Lawrence, S.V. Nuzhdin & T.F.C. Mackay, 1996. Effects of single P-element insertions on bristle number and viability in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 143: 277-292.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Lynch, M., 1985. Spontaneous mutations for life-history characters in an obligate parthenogen. Evolution 39: 804-818.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Mackay, T.F.C., R.F. Lyman & M.S. Jackson, 1992. Effects of P element insertions on quantitative traits in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 130: 315-332.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Mackay, T.F.C., R.F. Lyman & W.G. Hill, 1995. Polygenic mutation in Drosophila melanogaster: nonlinear divergence among unselected strains. Genetics 139: 849-859.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. MacMillan, M.F., F. Fitz-Earle & D.S. Robson, 1970. Quantitative genetics of fertility. I. Lifetime egg production of D. melanogaster theoretical. Genetics 65: 349-353.Google Scholar
  22. Mousseau, T.A. & D.A. Roff, 1987. Natural selection and the heritability of fitness components. Heredity 59: 181-197.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Mukai, T. & T. Yamazaki, 1971. The genetic structure of natural populations of Drosophila melanogaster. X. Developmental time and viability. Genetics 69: 385-398.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Nuzhdin, S.V., J.D. Fry & T.F.C. Mackay, 1995. Polygenic mutation in Drosophila melanogaster: the causal relationship of bristle number to fitness. Genetics 139: 861-872.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Riska, B., W.R. Atchley & J.J. Rutledge, 1984. A genetic analysis of targeted growth in mice. Genetics 107: 79-101.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Roff, D., 1981. On being the right size. Amer. Natur. 118: 405-422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Roff, D.A. & T.A. Mousseau, 1987. Quantitative genetics and fitness: lessons from Drosophila. Heredity 58: 103-118.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Rose, M., 1982. Antagonistic pleiotropy, dominance, and genetic variation. Heredity 48: 63-78.Google Scholar
  29. Rowe, L. & D. Houle, 1996. The lek paradox and the capture of genetic variance by condition dependent traits. Proc. Roy. Soc. London, Ser. B 263: 1415-1421.Google Scholar
  30. SAS Institute, I., 1990. SAS/STAT User's Guide, Version 6, 4th edn. SAS Institute, Cary, NC.Google Scholar
  31. Stearns, S.C., 1992. The Evolution ofLife Histories. Oxford, Oxford.Google Scholar
  32. Stearns, S.C. & T.J. Kawecki, 1994. Fitness sensitivity and the canalization of life-history traits. Evolution 48: 1438-1450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Stearns, S.C., M. Kaiser & T.J. Kawecki, 1995. The differential genetic and environmental canalization of fitness components in Drosophila melanogaster. J. Evol. Biol. 8: 539-557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Sved, J.A. & F.J. Ayala, 1970. A population cage test for heterosis in Drosophila pseudoobscura. Genetics 66: 97-113.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Waddington, C.H., 1957. The Strategy of the Genes. MacMillan Co., New York.Google Scholar
  36. Wagner, G., G. Booth & H. Bagheri-Chaichian, 1997. A population genetic theory of canalization. Evolution 51: 329-347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Yoshimaru, H. & T. Mukai, 1985. Relationships between the polygenes affecting the rate of development and viability in Drosophila melanogaster. Jap. J. Genet. 60: 307-334.Google Scholar
  38. Zwaan, B., R. Bijlsma & R.F. Hoekstra, 1995. Artificial selection for developmental time Drosophila melanogaster in relation to the evolution of aging: direct and correlated responses. Evolution 49: 635-648.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • David Houle
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of ZoologyUniversity of TorontoOntarioCanada M5S 3G5 (Phone

Personalised recommendations