Human Relations

, Volume 51, Issue 3, pp 413–429

Social Defenses Against Organizational Learning

  • Alastair Bain
Article

Abstract

It is argued that for organizational learning to occur maladaptive social defenses within the organization have to be altered. The origins of the concept of social defenses are traced through the work of Jaques and Menzies. A new concept of “system domain,” and related concepts of “system domain fabric,” and “system domain defenses,” are proposed in order to account for the difficulties in sustaining organizational change in organizations that share a similar primary task. “Organizational learning” is defined as occurring when there is co-evolution of “organizational container” and “contained.” The article distills variables from three successful consultancy/action research projects which are characteristic of organizations that are learning, and it is hypothesized that the creation of “organizational awareness” is necessary for organizational learning to occur.

SOCIAL DEFENSES ORGANIZATIONAL LEARNING SYSTEM DOMAIN SYSTEM DOMAIN DEFENSES ORGANIZATIONAL AWARENESS ACTION RESEARCH 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. Bain, A. The Baric Experiment: The Design of Jobs and Organization for the Expression and Growth of Human Capacity. Tavistock Institute Occasional Paper. No. 4, 1982.Google Scholar
  2. Bain, A., & Barnett, L. The Design of a Day Care System in a Nursery Setting for Children Under Five. Tavistock Institute Occasional Paper, No. 8, 1986.Google Scholar
  3. Bain, A., Long, S., & Ross, S. Paper Houses: The Authority Vacuum in a Government School. Australian Institute of Social Analysis Report,Collins Dove, Melbourne, 1992, p. 6.Google Scholar
  4. Bion, W. R. Attention and interpretation. London: Tavistock Publications Ltd., 1970.Google Scholar
  5. Freud, S. Group psychology and the analysis of the ego. In J. Strachey, (Ed.), The standard edition of the works of Sigmund Freud Vol XVIII,London: The Hogarth Press, 1955.Google Scholar
  6. Gilmore, T., & Krantz, J. The splitting of leadership and management as a social defence. Human Relations,1990, 43(2).Google Scholar
  7. Jaques, E. Social systems as a defence against persecutory and depressive anxiety. In M. Klein, P. Heimann, and R. Money-Kyrle (Eds.), New directions in psycho-analysis. London: Tavistock Publications, 1955.Google Scholar
  8. Klein, M. The psychoan alysis of children.London, 1932.Google Scholar
  9. Klein, M. Contributions to psychoanalysis. London, 1948.Google Scholar
  10. Klein, M. Developments in psychoanalysis.London, 1952.Google Scholar
  11. Lawrence, W. G. Understanding organizational life. In G. P. Chattopadhyay, Z. H. Gangjee, M. L. Hunt, and W. G. Lawrence (Eds.), When the twain meet. Allahabad: A. H. Wheeler & Co., Private Limited, 1986, p. 59.Google Scholar
  12. Meznar, M. B., & Nicolini, D. The social construction of organizational learning: Conceptual and practical issues in the field. Human Relations, 1995, 48(7).Google Scholar
  13. Menzies, I. E. P. The functioning of social systems against anxiety: A report on a study of the nursing service of a general hospital. London: Tavistock Institute of Human Relations, 1970.Google Scholar
  14. Menzies Lyth, I. E. P. Containing anxiety in institutions.London: Free Association Books, 1988, p. 89.Google Scholar
  15. Senge, P. M. The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization.Sydney: Random House Australia Pty. Ltd., 1992.Google Scholar
  16. Trist, E. The Evolution of Socio-Technical Systems: A Conceptual Framework and an Action Research Program.Ontario Quality of Working Life Centre Occasional Paper, No. 2, Canada, 1981.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Tavistock Institute 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alastair Bain

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations