Advertisement

Human Relations

, Volume 52, Issue 2, pp 179–203 | Cite as

Beyond Happy Families: A Critical Reevaluation of the Control-Resistance-Identity Triangle

  • Yiannis Gabriel
Article

Abstract

In this article, the author explores the natureof contemporary organizational controls, the extent towhich they can be said to colonize employeesubjectivity, and the types of resistance which theygenerate. Labor process, psychoanalytic, critical theory,and Foucauldian perspectives are juxtaposed and a numberof similarities and divergences are noted. It is arguedthat many of these perspectives prematurely lament the end of employee recalcitrance andexaggerate the magnitude and totality of organizationalcontrols, generating over-managed and overcontrolledimages of individuals, organizations, and societies. It is proposed that a rapprochement ofpsychoanalytic and labor theory approaches can lead toan appreciation of unmanaged and unmanageable terrainsin organizations, in which human agency may berediscovered, neither as a class-conscious proletariat nor asa transcendental subject, but as a struggling, feeling,thinking, suffering subject, one capable of obeying anddisobeying, controlling and being controlled, losing control and escaping control, definingand redefining control for itself and forothers.

CONTROL RESISTANCE IDENTITY SUBJECTIVITY FAMILY METAPHORS STORIES UNMANAGED ORGANIZATION PSYCHOANALYSIS LABOR PROCESS 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. AUSTRIN, T., Positioning resistance and resisting position: Human resource management and the politics of appraisal and grievance hearings. In J. M. Jermier, W. R. Nord, and D. Knights (Eds.), Resistance and power in organizations. London: Routledge, 1994, pp. 25-68.Google Scholar
  2. BARKER, J. R. Tightening the iron cage: Concertive control in self-managing teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1993, 38, 408-437.Google Scholar
  3. BAUM, H. S. The invisible bureaucracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1987.Google Scholar
  4. BEECH, N. Rhetoric and discourse in HRM. Management Learning, 1998, 29(1), 110-114.Google Scholar
  5. BERGQUIST, W. The postmodern organization: Mastering the art of irreversible change. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1993.Google Scholar
  6. BLACKWELL, T., & SEABROOK, J. A world still to win. London: Faber, 1985.Google Scholar
  7. BRAVERMAN, H. Labor and monopoly capital. New York: Monthly Review Press, 1974.Google Scholar
  8. BURAWOY, M. Manufacturing consent. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1979.Google Scholar
  9. BURAWOY, M. Between the labor process and the state: The changing face of factory regimes under advanced capitalism. American Sociological Review, 1983, 48, 587-605.Google Scholar
  10. BURAWOY, M. The politics of production. London: Verso, 1985.Google Scholar
  11. CARR, A. Putative problematic agency in a postmodern world. Administrative Theory and Praxis, 1996, 18(1), 79-86.Google Scholar
  12. CARR, A. Identity, compliance and dissent in organizations: A psychoanalytic perspective. Organization, 1998, 5(1), 81-99.Google Scholar
  13. CARR, A. Responding to paradigm proliferation: Public administration as a moral art? Leading and Managing, 1997, 3(1), 9-25.Google Scholar
  14. CASEY, C. Corporate transformations: Designer culture, designer employees and “post-occupational” Solidarity. Organization, 1996, 3(3), 317-339.Google Scholar
  15. CASEY, C. “Come, join our family”: Discipline and integration in corporate organizational culture. Human Relations, 1999, 52(2), 155-178.Google Scholar
  16. CLEGG, S. Modern organizations: Organization studies in the postmodern world, London: Sage, 1990.Google Scholar
  17. CLEGG, S., & JEFFCUTT, P. Modern organizations-organization studies in the postmodern world. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1993, 37, 686-688.Google Scholar
  18. COLLINSON, D. L. Strategies of resistance: Power, knowledge and subjectivity in the workplace. In J. Jermier, W. Nord, and D. Knights (Eds), Resistance and power in organizations. London: Routledge, 1994, pp. 25-68.Google Scholar
  19. DEETZ, S. Disciplinary power in the modern corporation. In M. Alvesson and H. Willmott (Eds.), Critical management studies. London: Sage, 1992.Google Scholar
  20. DIAMOND, M. A. The unconscio us life of organizations: Interpreting organizational identity. London: Quorum Books, 1993.Google Scholar
  21. DU GAY, P. Consumption and identity at work. London: Sage, 1996.Google Scholar
  22. DU GAY, P., & SALAMAN, G. The cult(ure) of the customer. Journal of Management Studies, 1992, 29(5), 615-633.Google Scholar
  23. EDWARDS, R. Contested terrain: The transformation of the workplace in the twentieth century. London: Heinemann, 1979.Google Scholar
  24. FINEMAN, S. Organizations as emotional arenas. In S. Fineman (Ed.), Emotion in organizations. London: Sage, 1993, pp. 9-35.Google Scholar
  25. FINEMAN, S. Emotion and organizing. In S. Clegg, C. Hardy, and W. R. Nord (Eds.), Handbook of organization studies. London: Sage, 1996.Google Scholar
  26. FINEMAN, S., & YIANNIS, G. Experiencing organizations. London: Sage, 1996.Google Scholar
  27. FINEMAN, S., & ANDREW, S. “Struggles” for the Control of Affect. Paper presented at the 16th International Labour Process Conference, Edinburgh, 1997.Google Scholar
  28. FIRAT, A. F. Fragmentations in the postmodern. Advances in Consumer Research, 1992, 19, 203-206.Google Scholar
  29. FOUCAULT, M. Discipline and punish. London: Allen Unwin, 1977.Google Scholar
  30. FOUCAULT, M. Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings 1972-1977. Brighton: Harvester Books, 1980.Google Scholar
  31. FREUD, S. Inhibitions, symptoms and anxiety (standard ed.). London: Hogarth Press, 1926.Google Scholar
  32. GABRIEL, Y. Turning facts into stories and stories into facts: A hermeneutic exploration of organizational folklore. Human Relations, 1991, 44(8), 857-875. (a)Google Scholar
  33. GABRIEL, Y. On organizational stories and myths. International Sociology, 1991, 6(4), 427-442. (b)Google Scholar
  34. GABRIEL, Y. Organizational nostalgia: Reflections on “The Golden Age.” In S. Fineman (Ed.), Emotion in organizations. London: Sage, 1993, pp. 118-141.Google Scholar
  35. GABRIEL, Y. The unmanaged organization: Stories, fantasies, subjectivity. Organization Studies, 1995, 16(3), 477-501.Google Scholar
  36. GABRIEL, Y. Meeting God: When organizational members come face to face with the organization's supreme leader. Human Relations, 1997, 50(4), 315-342, 1997.Google Scholar
  37. GABRIEL, Y. The use of stories. In G. Symon and C. Cassell (Eds.), Qualitative research methods and analysis in organizational research. London: Sage, 1998, pp. 135-160. (a)Google Scholar
  38. GABRIEL, Y. An introduction to the sociology of insults in organizations. Human Relations, 51(11), 1329-1354. (b)Google Scholar
  39. GABRIEL, Y. The hubris of management. Administrative Theory and Praxis, 1998, 20(3), 257-273. (c)Google Scholar
  40. GABRIEL, Y., & LANG, T. The unmanageable consumer: Contemporary consumption and its fragmentation. London: Sage, 1995.Google Scholar
  41. GORZ, A. Farewell to the working class, London: Pluto Press, 1982.Google Scholar
  42. GOULDNER, A. W. Metaphysical pathos and the theory of bureaucracy. American Political Review, 1995, 49, 469-505.Google Scholar
  43. GREY, C. Career as a project of the self and labour process discipline. Sociology, 1994, 28(2), 479-497. (a)Google Scholar
  44. GREY, C. Organizational Calvinism: Insecurity and labour power in a professional labour process. Paper from the 13th International Labour Process Conference, Aston, 1994. (b)Google Scholar
  45. GREY, C. Towards a critique of managerialism: The contribution of Simone Weil. Journal of Management Studies, 1996, 33(5), 592-611.Google Scholar
  46. HASSARD, J., & PARKER, M. (Eds.). Postmodernism and organizations. London: Sage, 1993.Google Scholar
  47. HIRSCHHORN, L. The workplace within. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1988.Google Scholar
  48. HIRSCHHORN, L. Professionals, authority, and group life: A case study of a law firm. Human Resource Management, 1989, 28(2), 235-252.Google Scholar
  49. HOCHSCHILD, A. R. The time bind: when work becomes home and home becomes work. New York: Henry Holt, 1997.Google Scholar
  50. HOPFL, H. The making of the corporate acolyte. Journal of Management Studies, 1992, 29(1), 23-34.Google Scholar
  51. JERMIER, J. M., KNIGHTS, D., & NORD, W. R. (Eds.). Resistance and power in organizations. London: Routledge, 1994.Google Scholar
  52. KETS DE VRIES, M. F. R. Prisoners of leadership. Human Relations, 1988, 41, 261-280.Google Scholar
  53. KNIGHTS, D. Subjectivity, power and the labour process. In D. Knights and H. Willmott (Eds.), Labour process theory. Macmillan, Basingstoke, 1990, pp. 297-235.Google Scholar
  54. KNIGHTS, D. Changing spaces: The disruptive impact of a new epistemological location for the study of management. Academ y of Management Review, 1992, 17(3), 518-545.Google Scholar
  55. KNIGHTS, D., & MORGAN, G. Selling oneself: Subjectivity and the labour process in selling life assurance. In C. Smith, D. Knights, and H. Willmott (Eds.), White-collar work. London: Macmillan, 1991, pp. 217-240.Google Scholar
  56. KNIGHTS, D., & MORGAN, G. Organization theory and consumption in a post-modern era. Organization Studies, 1993, 14(2), 211-234.Google Scholar
  57. KNIGHTS, D., & VURDUBAKIS, T. Foucault, power, resistance and all that. In J. M. Jermier, W. R. Nord, and D. Knights (Eds.), Resistan ce and power in organizations, London: Routledge, 1994, pp. 167-198.Google Scholar
  58. KRANTZ, J. Lessons from the field: An essay on the crisis of leadership in contemporary organizations. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 1990, 26(1), 49-64.Google Scholar
  59. KRANTZ, J. The managerial couple: Superior-subordinate relationships as a unit of analysis. Human Resource Management, 1989, 28(2), pp. 161-176.Google Scholar
  60. KUNDA, G. Engineering culture control and commitment in a high-tech corporation, Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 1992.Google Scholar
  61. LANUEZ, D., & JERMIER, J. M. Sabotage by managers and technocrats: neglected patterns of resistance at work. In J. M. Jermier, W. R. Nord, and D. Knights (Eds.), Resistance and power in organizations, London: Routledge, 1994, pp. 219-251.Google Scholar
  62. LASCH, C. The culture of narcissism. London: Abacus, 1980.Google Scholar
  63. LEGGE, K. Human resource management rhetoric and realities, Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1995.Google Scholar
  64. LINDHOLM, C. Lovers and leaders: A comparison of social and psychological models of romance and charisma. Social Science Information, 1988, 27(1), 3-45.Google Scholar
  65. MARCUSE, H. One dimensional man, Boston: Beacon Press, 1964.Google Scholar
  66. MARSDEN, R. The politics of organizational analysis. Organization Studies, 1993, 14, 93-124.Google Scholar
  67. MASON, E. S., & ADRIAN, C. Beyond the Detached and Textual View of Power: The Importance of the “Construction” of Identity. Paper from the 11th Conference of the British Academy of Management, London, 1997.Google Scholar
  68. MUMBY, D. K., & PUTNAM, L. L. The politics of emotion. Academy of Management Review, 1992, 17, 465-486.Google Scholar
  69. OGBONNA, E., & WILKINSON, B. Corporate strategy and corporate culture: The view from the checkout. Personnel Review, 1990, 19(4), 9:15.Google Scholar
  70. OGLENSKY, B. D. Socio-psychoanalytic perspectives on the subordinate. Human Relations, 1995, 48(9), 1029-1054.Google Scholar
  71. PARKER, M. Critique in the name of what? Postmodernism and critical approaches to organization. Organization Studies, 1995, 16(4), 553-564. (a)Google Scholar
  72. PARKER, M. Working together, working apart: management culture in a manufacturing firm. Sociological Review, 1995, 43(3), 518-547. (b)Google Scholar
  73. PARKER, M., & SLAUGHTER, J. Should the labour movement buy TQM? Journal of Organizational Change Management, 1993, 6(4), 43-56.Google Scholar
  74. PARKER, M. Post-modern organizations or postmodern theory? Organization Studies, 1992, 13(1), 1-17.Google Scholar
  75. PETERS, T. S., & WATERMAN, R. H. In search of excellence, New York: Harper and Row, 1982.Google Scholar
  76. PURCELL, J. The end of institutional industrial relations. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 1993, 31, 6-23.Google Scholar
  77. PUTNAM, L. L., & MUMBY, D. K. Organizations, emotion and the myth of rationality. In S. Fineman (Ed.), Emotion in organizations, London: Sage, 1993, pp. 36-57.Google Scholar
  78. RAY, C. A. Corporate culture: The last frontier of control. Journal of Management Studies, 1985, 23, 287-297.Google Scholar
  79. ROSENTHAL, P., HILL, S., & PECCEI, R. Checking out service: Evaluating excellence, HRM and TQM in retailing. Work, Employment and Society, 1997, 11, 481-504.Google Scholar
  80. ROTHSCHILD, J., & MIETHE, T. D. Whistleblowing as resistance in modern work organizations: The politics of revealing organizational deception and abuse. In J. Jermier, W. Nord, and D. Knights (Eds.), Resistance and power in organizations, London: Routledge, 1994, pp. 252-273.Google Scholar
  81. ROY, D. Quota restriction and goldbricking in a machine shop. American Journal of Sociology, 1952, 57, 427-442.Google Scholar
  82. ROY, D. Efficiency and the “Fix”: Informal inter-group relations in piecework machine shops. American Journal of Sociology, 1954, 60, 255-266.Google Scholar
  83. SAKOLSKY, R. Disciplinary power and the labour process. In A. J. Sturdy, D. Knights, and H. Willmott (Eds.), Skill and consent: Contemporary studies in the labour process. London: Routledge, 1992.Google Scholar
  84. SCHWARTZ, H. S. Review of Boje D. M. and R. F. Dennehy (1993). Managing in the Postmodern World: America's Revolution Against Exploitation. Academy of Management Review, 1995, 20(1), 215-221.Google Scholar
  85. SCHWARTZ, H. S. The usefulness of myth and the myth of usefulness: A dilemma for the applied organizational scientist. Journal of Management, 1985, 11(1), 31-42.Google Scholar
  86. SCHWARTZ, H. S. Anti-social actions of committed organizational participants: An existential psychoanalytic perspective. Organization Studies, 1987, 8(4), 327-340. (a)Google Scholar
  87. SCHWARTZ, H. S. On the psychodynamics of organizational totalitarianism. Journal of Management, 1987, 13(1), 45-54. (b)Google Scholar
  88. SCHWARTZ, H. S. Narcissistic process and corporate decay, New York: New York University Press, 1990.Google Scholar
  89. SCHWARTZ, H. S. Narcissistic process and corporate decay, New York: New York University Press, 1990.Google Scholar
  90. SEWELL, G., & WILKINSON, B. Someone to watch over me: Surveillance, discipline and the just-in-time labour process. Sociology, 1992, 26(2), 271-289. (a)Google Scholar
  91. SEWELL, G., & WILKINSON, B. Empowerment or emasculation: Shopfloor surveillance in a total quality organization. In R. Blyton and P. Turnbull (Eds.), Reassessing human resource management, London: Sage, 1992. (b)Google Scholar
  92. SIEVERS, B. Work, death, and life itself. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 1994.Google Scholar
  93. SMIRCICH, L. Concepts of culture and organizational analysis. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1983, 28, 339-358.Google Scholar
  94. STURDY, A. Clerical consent: “Shifting” work in the insurance office. In A. J. Sturdy, D. Knights, and H. Willmott (Eds.), Skill and consent: Contemporary studies in the labour process. London: Routledge, 1992, pp. 115-149.Google Scholar
  95. STURDY, A. The consultancy process-An insecure business. Journal of Management Studies, 1997, 34(3), 389-413.Google Scholar
  96. STURDY, A. Customer care in a consumer society: Smiling and some times meaning it? Organization, 1998, 5(1), 27-53, 1998.Google Scholar
  97. SUERDEM, A., & SINAN, M. What are you doing after the orgy? Or does the consumer really behave (well)? Advances in Consumer Research, 1992, 19, 207-212.Google Scholar
  98. THOMPSON, P. Crawling from the wreckage: The labour process and the politics of production. In D. Knights, and H. Willmott (Eds.), Labou r process theory. London: Macmillan, 1990.Google Scholar
  99. THOMPSON, P. Postmodernism: Fatal distraction. In J. Hassard and M. Parker (Eds.), Postmodernism and organizations, London: Sage, 1993, pp. 183-203.Google Scholar
  100. THOMPSON, P., & ACKROYD, S. All quiet on the workplace front? A critique of recent trends in british industrial sociology. Sociology, 1995, 29(4), 615-633.Google Scholar
  101. TOWNLEY, B. Foucault, power/knowledge and its relevance for human resource management”. Aacademy of Management Review, 1993, 18(3), 518-545.Google Scholar
  102. VENKATESH, A. Postmodernism, consumer culture and the society of the spectacle. Advances in Consumer Research, 1992, 19, 199-202.Google Scholar
  103. WATSON, T. J. In search of management: Culture, chaos and control in managerial work. London: Routledge, 1994.Google Scholar
  104. WILLMOTT, H. Studying managerial work: A critique and a proposal. Journal of Management Science, 1987, 24(3), 249-270.Google Scholar
  105. WILLMOTT H. Subjectivity and the dialectics of praxis: Opening up the core of labour process analysis. In D. Knights and H. Willmott (Eds.), Labour process theory, Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1990, pp. 336-378.Google Scholar
  106. WILLMOTT, H. Strength is ignorance, slavery is freedom: Managing culture in modern organizations. Journal of Management Studies, 1993, 30, 515-552.Google Scholar
  107. ZALEZNIK, A. The dynamics of subordinacy. Harvard Business Review. May/June 1965, 119-131.Google Scholar
  108. ZUBOFF, S. In the age of the smart machine. Oxford: Heinemann, 1988.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Tavistock Institute 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yiannis Gabriel
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Work and Employment Research Centre, School of ManagementUniversity of BathBathUK
  2. 2.Work and Employment Research Centre, School of ManagementUniversity of BathUK

Personalised recommendations