Journal of Science Education and Technology

, Volume 10, Issue 3, pp 273–281 | Cite as

Factors in Decisions of Underrepresented Minorities to Forego Science and Engineering Doctoral Study: A Pilot Study

  • Marian E. Brazziel
  • William F. Brazziel
Article

Abstract

The research described here comprised a pilot study that attempted to identify the factors in decisions of highly capable students from underrepresented minority groups to forego study for science or engineering doctorates. Underrepresented students are defined as Blacks, Hispanics, and Indians. While these groups will soon comprise 30% or more of the population, they receive only 5% of the S & E (Science and Engineering) doctorates. The research was completed under NSF (National Science Foundation) grant no. REC 9908861. The research built on a previous NSF study (RED-9355867) that identified the most effective colleges and universities in the country in the preparation of Black, Hispanic, and Indian science and engineering students for study toward the PhD degree. One of the major concerns raised during the site visits to the top 10 institutions serving these groups was the loss of capable students to other careers. The study obtained information from minority graduates about factors impacting persistence to graduate studies in science and engineering and solicited suggestions for attracting more people like themselves to S & E doctoral study. Twelve underrepresented minority S & E graduates who decided to forego doctoral study in favor of other pursuits. Themes emerging from these conversations regarding reluctance to pursue advanced study included the following: concern for ability to finance such study; weaknesses in advisement practices and systems; lack of full knowledge, early on, about the rewards of doctoral employment; and concern about opportunities for employment after graduation. Suggestions proffered for attracting more underrepresented minorities to S & E doctoral study included the following: early socialization of youngsters into the world of science and its practice; expanded funding for scholarships and fellowships; expanded outreach by colleges and universities; expanded efforts by churches and community groups and deeper commitments by colleges and universities.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. Allison, G. T. (1971). Essence of Decision, Little, Brown and Company, Boston.Google Scholar
  2. Blau, P. M., Gustad, J. W., Jesser, R., Parnes, H. S., and Jesser, R. Elements of decision theory. Industrial Relations Review 9: 531–543.Google Scholar
  3. Bazerman, M. H. (1990). Judgement, in Managerial Decision Making, Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
  4. Brazziel, W. F., and Brazziel, M. E. (1992). Science and Engineering Doctorate Production Among Minorities with Non-Traditional Backgrounds, Report of Research Grant No. SED-9107756, National Science Foundation.Google Scholar
  5. Brazziel, W. F., and Brazziel, M. E. (1995). Distinctiues of High Producers of Minoritu Science and Engineering Doctoral Starts, Report of Research Grant No. RED-9355867, National Science Foundation.Google Scholar
  6. Brazziel, W. F. (1964). Workers' Decisions to Retrain, Research Monograph No. 200, U.S. Department of Labor.Google Scholar
  7. Cirasa-Parish, A. M. (1991). Planning Considerations Accorded Corporate Courses Designed for College Credit, Doctoral Dissertation, University of Connecticut.Google Scholar
  8. Cook, R.W., and Zalloco, R. L. (1983). Predicting university preference and attendance. Research in Higher Education 19: 197–211.Google Scholar
  9. Davis, D. (1997). The directive of race of interview effects among African Americans. American Journal of Political Science 41: 309–322.Google Scholar
  10. Demis, R. (1996). Creating conversation: Reflections on cultural sensitivity in family interviewing. Journal of Applied Psychology 81: 178–186.Google Scholar
  11. Drucker, P. (1974). Management: Tasks, Practices, Responsibilities, Harper & Row, New York.Google Scholar
  12. Glazer, B., and Strauss, A. (1969). The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research, Aldine, Chicago.Google Scholar
  13. Hamilton, D. A. (1995). Interviewing procedures for validating science assessments. Measurement in Education 10: 181–200.Google Scholar
  14. Hardi, B. (1999). Graduate Enrollment in Science and Engineering Continued to Decline in 1998, National Science Foundation Data Brief No. 00-307.Google Scholar
  15. Hodgkinson, H. F. (1994). How We Are Changing, Center for Demographic Policy, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  16. Holstein, *7. (1995). The Active Interview, Sage, New York.Google Scholar
  17. Hossler, D., and Gallagher, K. (1987). Studying college choice. College and University 62: 207–221.Google Scholar
  18. Hudson Institute. (1987). Workforce 2000, Indianapolis, IN.Google Scholar
  19. Kador, J. (1997). Ask the right questions. Datamation 43: 59–62.Google Scholar
  20. Kerlinger, F. N. (1973). Foundations of Behavioral Research, Holt, Rhinehart and Winston, New York.Google Scholar
  21. Kuh, G. (1998). Involving Colleges, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.Google Scholar
  22. Levine, A. (1976). Educational and occupational choice: A synthesis of literature from Sociology and Psychology. Journal of Consumer Research 2: 276–289.Google Scholar
  23. McDonough, P. (1997). Choosing Colleges, State University of New York Press, New York.Google Scholar
  24. McGarry, M. (1992). Decision Factors Related to Dual Accreditation of Nursing Programs, Doctoral Dissertation, University of Connecticut.Google Scholar
  25. Mencucci, J. (1996). Mentoring of Women Science and Engineering Doctoral Students, Doctoral Dissertation, University of Connecticut.Google Scholar
  26. Milam, J. F. (1990). Overcoming barriers to college attendance. UCLA Journal of Education 29: 39–53.Google Scholar
  27. National Science Foundation. (1999). Doctorate Recipients From United States Universities: Summary Report 1998.Google Scholar
  28. Petersen, P., and Ivey, A. (1993). Culture Centered Counseling and Interviewing Skills, Praeger Press, Westport, CT.Google Scholar
  29. Prewitt, L. (1996). Effects of race on interview ratings. Journal of Applied Psychology 81: 178–186.Google Scholar
  30. Sheppard, S. L., and Carrger, E. (1995). Commentary on student interviews. Innovation in Higher Education 20: 271–276.Google Scholar
  31. Steinbrunner, W. (1974). The Cybernetic Theory of Decision, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
  32. Sivula, M. (1991). Factors in Doctorate Recipients Decisions to Forego Careers in College Teaching, Doctoral Dissertation, University of Connecticut.Google Scholar
  33. Tsapogos, J. (1996). Incidence of and Factors Related to Progression to Graduate School Among Recent Science and Engineering Baccalaureate Recipients, Paper Presented at the 1996 Association for Institutional Research Conference.Google Scholar
  34. Weiss, R. (1994). Learning From Strangers, Free Press, New York.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marian E. Brazziel
    • 1
  • William F. Brazziel
    • 2
  1. 1.Marian Brazziel AssociatesMansfield CenterConnecticut
  2. 2.University of ConnecticutConnecticut

Personalised recommendations