Advertisement

Constitutional Political Economy

, Volume 12, Issue 1, pp 13–29 | Cite as

An Evolutionary Theory of Collective Action: Schumpeterian Entrepreneurship for the Common Good

  • Stephan Kuhnert
Article

Abstract

This paper presents the foundations of a dynamictheory of collective action. Firstly, the role of public entrepreneursin processes of institutional development is characterized. Secondly,the protagonists of social change are analyzed in regard to theirmotivation, strategic options, levels of action, and specificcapabilities. A new perspective on successful collective actionis opened up.

entrepreneurship collective action innovation evolution institutions 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Baumol, W. (1968) “Entrepreneurship in Economic Theory.” American Economic Review (Papers and Proceedings) 58: 64–71.Google Scholar
  2. Blomquist, W. (1992) Dividing the Waters: Governing Groundwater in Southern California. San Francisco: ICS Press.Google Scholar
  3. Buchanan, J. M., and Vanberg, V. (1991) “The Market as a Creative Process.” Economics and Philosophy 7: 167–186.Google Scholar
  4. Downs, A. (1957) An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  5. Frohlich, N., and Oppenheimer, J. A. (1978) Modern Political Economy. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  6. Frohlich, N., Oppenheimer, J. A., and Young, O. R. (1971) Political Leadership and Collective Goods. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Hayek, F. A. von. (1969) Freiburger Studien. Tübingen: Mohr.Google Scholar
  8. Hobbes, T. (1960 [1651]) Leviathan. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
  9. Kaletsch, S. (1998) Menschenbild, Moral und wirtschaftliche Entwicklung. Münster: LIT.Google Scholar
  10. Khalil, E. L. (1997) “Buridan's Ass, Risk, Uncertainty, and Self-Competition: A Theory of Entrepreneurship.” Kyklos50: 147–163.Google Scholar
  11. Kirzner, I. M. (1973) Competition and Entrepreneurship. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  12. Kiser, L., and Ostrom, E. (1982) “The Three Worlds of Action: A Metaphorical Synthesis of Institutional Approaches.” In: Ostrom, E. (ed.) Strategies of Political Inquiry, pp. 179-222, Beverly Hills: Sage. A Metaphorical Synthesis of Institutional Approaches.” In: Ostrom, E. (ed.) Strategies of Political Inquiry, pp. 179-222. Beverly Hills: Sage.Google Scholar
  13. Knight, F. (1921) Risk, Uncertainty and Profit. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
  14. Krüsselberg, H.-G. (1969) Marktwirtschaft und ¨okonomische Theorie. Freiburg: Rombach.Google Scholar
  15. Kuhnert, S. (2000) Gesellschaftliche Innovation als unternehmerischer Prozeß. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot.Google Scholar
  16. Mintrom, M. (2000) Policy Entrepreneurs and School Choice, Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University PressGoogle Scholar
  17. Mitchell, W. C. (1984) “Schumpeter and Public Choice, Part I: Precursor to public choice?” Public Choice 42: 73–88.Google Scholar
  18. Olson, M. (1971 [1965]) The Logic of Collective Action. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Olson, M. (1982) The Rise and Decline of Nations. New Haven-London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Olson, M. (1987) “Collective Action.” In: Eatwell, J., Milgate, M., and Newman, P. (eds.) The New Palgrave: A Dictionary of Economics, vol. 1, pp. 474–477. London-Basingstoke: Macmillan Press.Google Scholar
  21. Ostrom, E. (1965) Public Entrepreneurship: A Case Study in Ground Water Basin Management. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of California-Los Angeles.Google Scholar
  22. Ostrom, E. (1990) Governing the Commons. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Ostrom, E. (1998) “A Behavioral Approach to the Rational Choice Theory of Collective Action, ” American Political Science Review 92: 1–22.Google Scholar
  24. Ostrom, V. (1989) Executive Leadership, Authority Relationships, and Public Entrepreneurship, Working Paper, Workshop in Political Science and Policy Analysis, Indiana University, Bloomington, January 19.Google Scholar
  25. Ostrom, V. (1997) The Meaning of Democracy and the Vulnerability of Democracies. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  26. Salisbury, R. H. (1969) “An Exchange Theory of Interest Groups.” Midwest Journal of Political Science 1: 1–32.Google Scholar
  27. Schumpeter, J. A. (1993 [1911]) Theorie der wirtschaftlichen Entwicklung, 8th ed. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot.Google Scholar
  28. Schumpeter, J. A. (1961 [1911]) A Theory of Economic Development. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Schumpeter, J. A. (1928) “Unternehmer.” In: Handwörterbuch der Staatswissenschaften 8: 476–487Google Scholar
  30. Schumpeter, J. A. (1939) Business Cycles: A Theoretical, Historical and Statistical Analysis of the Capitalist Process, 2 Vols. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  31. Schumpeter, J. A. (1976 [1942]) Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy, 5th ed. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  32. Schumpeter, J. A. (1952 [1932]) “Das Woher und Wohin unserer Wissenschaft.” Farewell Lecture, University of Bonn, June 20, 1932. In: Schumpeter, J. A. (1952) Aufsätze zur ökonomischen Theorie, pp. 598–608. Tübingen: Mohr.Google Scholar
  33. Schumpeter, J. A. (1954) History of Economic Analysis. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Shackle, G. L. S. (1961) Decision, Order and Time in Human Affairs. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Shackle, G. L. S. (1964) “Review of R.A.D. Egerton: Investment Decisions under Uncertainty, Liverpool: Liverpool University Press, 1960.” The Economic Journal 293: 172–174.Google Scholar
  36. Shackle, G. L. S. (1988) Business, Time and Thought. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Smith, A. (1981 [1776]) An Inquiry Into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations. Indianapolis: Liberty Classics.Google Scholar
  38. Wagner, R. E. (1966) “Pressure Groups and Political Entrepreneurs: A Review Article.” Papers on Non-Market Decision Making 1: 161–170.Google Scholar
  39. Weber, M. (1988) “Politik als Beruf.” In: Weber, M. (ed.) Gesammelte Politische Schriften, pp. 505–560, Tübingen: Mohr.Google Scholar
  40. Weber, M. (1996) Die protestantische Ethik und der Geist des Kapitalismus, 2nd ed. Weinheim: Beltz.Google Scholar
  41. White, L. H. (1990 [1976]) “Entrepreneurship, Imagination, and the Question of Equilibration.” In: Littlechild, S. (ed.) Austrian Economics, vol. III, pp. 87–104. Aldershot: Elgar.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Stephan Kuhnert
    • 1
  1. 1.Workshop in Political Theory and Policy AnalysisIndiana UniversityBloomingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations