Journal of Family and Economic Issues

, Volume 22, Issue 2, pp 101–119 | Cite as

Unbinding Time: Alternate Work Schedules and Work-Life Balance

  • Mark Tausig
  • Rudy Fenwick

Abstract

We examine the possibility that alternate work schedules affect perceived work-life imbalance—the “time bind.” The results show that alternate schedules per se do not “unbind” time. However, perceived control of work schedules increases work-life balance net of family and work characteristics. The most consistent family characteristic predicting imbalance is being a parent. The most consistent work characteristic predicting imbalance is hours worked. Once we control for hours worked, women and part-timers are shown to perceive more imbalance. Younger and better educated persons also perceive more work-life imbalance. However, they also report higher levels of schedule control and since schedule control improves work-life balance, it may be more important for unbinding time than schedule alternatives.

work-life balance work schedules control 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Becker, P. E. & Moen, P. (1999). Scaling back: Dual-earner couples' work-family strategies. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 61, 995-1007.Google Scholar
  2. Cohen, J. & Cohen, P. (1983). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences, Second Edition. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  3. Coser, L. & Coser, R. (1974). Greedy institutions: Patterns of undivided commitment. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  4. Fast, J. E. & Frederick, J. A. (1996). Working arrangements and time stress. Canadian Social Trends (Winter), 14-19.Google Scholar
  5. Galinsky, E., Bond, J. T. & Friedman, D. E. (1993). The changing workforce: Highlights of the national study. New York: Families and Work Institute.Google Scholar
  6. Glass, J. & Camarigg, V. (1992). Gender, parenthood, and job-family compatibility. American Journal of Sociology, 98, 131-151.Google Scholar
  7. Gutek, B.A., Searle, S. & Klepa, L. (1991). Rational versus gender role explanations for work-family conflict. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 560-568.Google Scholar
  8. Hochschild, A. R. (1997). The time bind: When work becomes home and home becomes work. New York: Metropolitan Books.Google Scholar
  9. Hodson, R. D. (1978). Labor in monopoly, competitive, and state sectors of production. Politics and Society, 8, 429-80.Google Scholar
  10. Jacobs, J. A. & Gerson, K. (1998). Who are the overworked Americans? Review of Social Economy, 56, 442-459.Google Scholar
  11. Kingston, P. W. & Nock, S. L. (1985). Consequences of the family work day. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 47, 619-29.Google Scholar
  12. Kinnunen, U. & Mauno, S. (1998). Antecedents and outcomes of work-family conflict among employed women and men in Finland. Human Relations, 51, 157-77.Google Scholar
  13. Milkie, M. A. & Peltola, P. A. (1999). Playing all the roles: Gender and the work-family balancing act. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 61, 476-490.Google Scholar
  14. Mirowsky, J. & Ross, C. E. (1989). Social causes of psychological distress. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  15. Negrey, C. (1984). Gender, time, and reduced work. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  16. Presser, H. B. (1986). Shift work among American women and child care. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 48, 551-563.Google Scholar
  17. Presser, H. B. (1995). Job, family and gender: Determinants of nonstandard work schedules among employed Americans in 1991. Demography, 32, 577-95.Google Scholar
  18. Robinson, J. P. & Godbey, G. (1999). Time for life: The surprising ways Americans use their time, 2 ed. University Park: Penn State University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Ross, C. E. & Sastry, J. (1999). The sense of personal control. In C. S. Aneshensel & J. Phelan (Eds.), Handbook of the sociology of mental health. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.Google Scholar
  20. Staines G. L. & Pleck, J. H. (1983). The impact of work schedules on the family. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan, Institute for Social Research.Google Scholar
  21. Staines, G. L. & Pleck, J. H. (1986). Work schedule flexibility and family life. Journal of Occupational Behaviour, 7, 147-153.Google Scholar
  22. Tilly, C. (1996). Half a job: Bad and good part-time jobs in a changing labor market. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
  23. U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. (1998). Workers on flexible and shift work in 1997. U.S. Department of Labor Report 98-119. Washington D.C.: Bureau of Labor Statistics.Google Scholar
  24. Voydanoff, P. (1988). Work role characteristics, family structure demands, and work/family conflict. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 50, 749-761.Google Scholar
  25. White, L. & Keith, B. (1990). The effect of shift work on the quality and stability of marital relations. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 52, 453-462.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Human Sciences Press, Inc. 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mark Tausig
    • 1
  • Rudy Fenwick
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Sociology at the University of AkronAkron

Personalised recommendations