Biodiversity & Conservation

, Volume 10, Issue 7, pp 1051–1058

The value of information in reserve site selection

  • Stephen Polasky
  • Andrew R. Solow
Article

Abstract

The reserve site selection problem is to select sites for the establishment of biological reserves with the goal to maximize the number of species contained in the reserves. When species distributions are known, this corresponds to the maximal coverage problem. In practice, knowledge of species distributions may be incomplete and only incidence probabilities are available. In this case, the goal is to maximize the expected number of species contained in the reserves. This is called the maximal expected coverage problem. This paper describes and illustrates a formal approach to assess the value of information, such as site surveys or species surveys, in this problem.

Bayesian decision theory maximal expected coverage problem optimization 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Berger JO (1985) Statistical Decision Theory and Bayesian Analysis. Springer-Verlag, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  2. Camm J,Norman S,Polasky S andSolow A (2000) Nature reserve site selection to maximize expected species covered. Operations Research (submitted)Google Scholar
  3. Camm J,Polasky S,Solow A andCsuti B (1996) A note on optimization models for reserve site selection. Biological Conservation 78: 353-355Google Scholar
  4. Church R,Stoms D andDavis F (1996) Reserve selection as a maximal coverage problem. Biological Conservation 76: 105-112Google Scholar
  5. Cocks KD andBaird IA (1989) Using mathematical programming to address the multiple reserve selection problem: an example for Eyre Peninsula, South Australia. Biological Conservation 49: 113-130Google Scholar
  6. Csuti B,Polasky S,Williams P,Pressey R,Camm J,Kershaw M,Kiester A,Downs B,Hamilton R,Huso M andSahr K (1997) A comparison of reserve selection algorithms using data on terrestrial vertebrates in Oregon. Biological Conservation 80: 83-97Google Scholar
  7. Margules C andAustin M (1994) Biological moels for monitoring species decline: the construction and use of databases. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B345: 69-75Google Scholar
  8. Margules C andStein J (1989) Patterns in the distribution of species and the selection of nature reserves: an example from eucalyptus forests in south-eastern New South Wales. Biological Conservation 50: 219-238Google Scholar
  9. Nicholls A (1989) How to make biological surveys go further with generalized linear models. Biological Conservation 50: 51-75Google Scholar
  10. Polasky S,Camm J,Solow A,Csuti B,White D andDing R (2000) Choosing reserve networks with incomplete species information. Biological Conservation 94 1-10Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Stephen Polasky
    • 1
  • Andrew R. Solow
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Applied EconomicsUniversity of MinnesotaSt. PaulUSA
  2. 2.Woods Hole Oceanographic InstitutionWoods HoleUSA

Personalised recommendations