Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 39, Issue 3, pp 275–296 | Cite as

Mining, Corporate Social Responsibility and the "Community": The Case of Rio Tinto, Richards Bay Minerals and the Mbonambi

  • Paul Kapelus
Article

Abstract

Mining companies have long had a questionable reputation for social responsibility, especially in developing countries. In recent years, mining companies operating in developing countries have come under increased pressure as opponents have placed them under greater public scrutiny. Mining companies have responded by developing global corporate social responsibility strategies as part of their larger global business strategies. In these strategies, a prominent place is given to their relationship with local communities. For business ethics, one basic issue is whether such an approach to corporate responsibility is likely to effectively address the development concerns of local communities in developing countries. This paper addresses this question by investigating how the corporate social responsibility agenda of a major minor company has been implemented by one of its subsidiaries in South Africa.

corporate social responsibility mining ethics Rio Tinto 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Appadurai, A.: 1986, ‘Introduction: Commodities and the Politics of Value', in A. Appadurai (ed.), The Social Life of Things: Commodities in Cultural Perspective (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge).Google Scholar
  2. Asia-Pacific Human Rights Network: 2001, 'Associating with the Wrong Company: Rio Tinto's Record and the Global Compact', July 16, http://www.corpwatch.org/un/updates/2001/ riotintob.html.Google Scholar
  3. Billiton: 1998, Annual Report (Billiton, London).Google Scholar
  4. Botha, D.: 1994, ‘The Changing Business of Business in South Africa: Some Comments on Developments in the Scope and Control of the Social Responsibility in South Africa', SA Merc.I.J.(6), 90–96.Google Scholar
  5. Broad, A.: 1997, ‘Mining Versus the Environment', MBM (June), 30–33.Google Scholar
  6. Burger, J.: 1987, Report from the Frontier.The State of the World's Indigenous Peoples (Zed Books, London).Google Scholar
  7. Carter, A. S.: 1997, Community Participation as an Indicator of Social Performance at International Mining Projects (Mining and Environment Research Network, Bath).Google Scholar
  8. Cochrane, G.: 1999, Interview with Author. London. 25 May 1999.Google Scholar
  9. Cohen, A. P.: 1986, ‘Symbolism and Social Change: Matters of Life and Death in Whalsay, Shetland', MAN 20(2), 307–324.Google Scholar
  10. Cragg, W., D. Pearson and J. Cooney: 1995, ‘Ethics, Surface Mining and the Environment', Resources Policy 21(4), 229–235.Google Scholar
  11. Crewe, E. and E. Harrison: 1998, Whose Development? An Ethnography of Aid (Zed Books, London and New York).Google Scholar
  12. Crooke, R. and J. Manor: 1998, Democracy and Decentralisation in South Asia and West Africa: Participation, Accountability and Performance (Cambridge University Press Cambridge).Google Scholar
  13. Crowson, P.: 1998, ‘Environment and Community Issues and the Mining Industry', Natural Resources Forum 22(2), 127–130.Google Scholar
  14. Drillbits and Tailings: 2000, 'Rio Tinto Kelian Mine Shut Down by Community Blockade', 5(8), May 16, accessed at: http://www.moles.org/Project-Underground/drillbits/5_08/1.html.Google Scholar
  15. Eriksen, T. H.: 1993, Ethnicity and Nationalism: Anthropological Perspectives (Pluto Press, London).Google Scholar
  16. Fabig, H. and R. Boele: 1999, ‘The Changing Nature of NGO Activity in a Globalising World: Pushing the Corporate Responsibility Movement', in Globalisation and the Governance of the Environment, International Development Studies Bulletin 30(3), 58–59.Google Scholar
  17. Fabig, H. and P. Kapelus: 2000, 'Corporate Responsibility: A Control and Survival Discourse?', paper presented at a conference: Reconstructing Human Rights-A Critical Project for the 21st Century?, University of Sussex, Brighton.Google Scholar
  18. Ferguson, J.: 1998, ‘Transnational Topographies of Power: Beyond "the State" and "Civil Society" in the Study of African Politics', in H. S. Manussen and S. Arnfred (eds.), Concepts and Metaphors: Ideologies, Narratives and Myths in Development Discourse (International Development Studies, Roskilde University), Occasional Paper no. 19.Google Scholar
  19. Gonsalves, M.: 1999, Interview with Author. London. 26 May 1999.Google Scholar
  20. Godsell, B.: 1994, ‘The RDP: A View from Business', South African Labour Bulletin 18(1), 7–9.Google Scholar
  21. Grillo, R. D.: 1997, ‘Discourses of Development: The View from Anthropology', in R. D. Grillo and R. L. Stirrat (eds.), Discourses of Development.Anthropological Perspectives (Berg, Oxford).Google Scholar
  22. Hannerz, U.: 1996, Transnational Connections.Culture, People, Places (Routledge, London).Google Scholar
  23. ICEM: 1998a, Rio Tinto Tainted Titan-The Stakeholders Report 1997 (ICEM, Belgium).Google Scholar
  24. ICEM: 1998b, Rio Tinto Behind the Facade-The Stakeholders Report 1998 (ICEM, Belgium).Google Scholar
  25. ICFTU: 1998. ICFTU comments on Rio Tinto's 'the way we work; our statement on business practice', accessed at: http://www.icftu.org/displaydocument. asp?Index=990917144&Language=EN.Google Scholar
  26. IIED: 2000, 'Mining Minerals and Sustainable Development', accessed at: http://www.iied.org/ mmsd/.Google Scholar
  27. Innes, D.: 1992, ‘Business and Social Change', in D. Innes, M. Kentridge and H. Perold (eds.), Power and Profit: Politics, Labour and Business in South Africa (Oxford University Press, Cape Town).Google Scholar
  28. Keeton, M.: 1997, ‘The Anglo American and De Beers Chairman's Fund at Work', Optima (July), 13–22.Google Scholar
  29. Keeton, M.: 1999, Interview with Author. Johannesburg. 17 June, 1999.Google Scholar
  30. Kennedy, D.: 2001, 'Rio Tinto: Global Compact Violator-PT Kelian: A Case Study of Global Operations' (Corporate Watch), July 13, 2001, accessed at: http://www.corpwatch.org/un/ updates/2001/riotinto.htmlGoogle Scholar
  31. Khubeka, J.: 1999, Interview with Author. Richards Bay. 23 June, 1999.Google Scholar
  32. Marais, E.: 1999, Interview with Author, 21 June 1999, Richards Bay.Google Scholar
  33. McMahon, G.: 1998, ‘Mining and the Community-A Synthesis', in G. McMahon (ed.), Mining and the Community: Results of the Quito Conference (World Bank, Washington), EMT Occasional Paper no. 11, 1–10.Google Scholar
  34. Nelson, J.: 1996, Business as Partners in Development (The Prince of Wales Business Leaders Forum, London).Google Scholar
  35. Nelson, J.: 1998, Building Competitiveness and Communities.How World Class Companies are Creating Shareholder Value and Societal Value (The Prince of Wales Business Leaders Forum and The United Nations Development Programme, London).Google Scholar
  36. O'Brien, R. M. J.: 1998, Business-Education Partnerships with Specific Reference to the Educational Involvement of Richards Bay Minerals (RBM) as a Case Study of Partnership in KwaZulu-Natal (University of Natal, Durban).Google Scholar
  37. O'Dowd, M.: 1997, ‘On Backing Initiative', Optima (July), 5–7.Google Scholar
  38. O'Fairclough, C.: 1999, ‘Indigenous People and Mineral Taxation Regimes', Resources Policy 24(4), 187–198.Google Scholar
  39. Pettifer, J.: 1998, ‘The Age of Post-paternalism', Review 47, 3–6.Google Scholar
  40. Richards Bay Minerals (RBM): 1998, Community Development, http://www.rbm.co.za.Google Scholar
  41. Rio Tinto: 2001, Human Rights Guidance: Guidance for Managers on Implementing the Human Rights Policy in 'The Way We Work’ (Rio Tinto, London).Google Scholar
  42. Rio Tinto.: 1999, ‘Forward Look', Review 40, 16–17.Google Scholar
  43. Rio Tinto.: 1998, The Way We Work (Rio Tinto, London).Google Scholar
  44. Rio Tinto.: 1997, Communities Policy Guidelines (Rio Tinto, London).Google Scholar
  45. Roussouw, D.: 1994, Business Ethics (Halfway House, Southern Book Publishers).Google Scholar
  46. Ruffini, A.: 1998, ‘Bafokeng Succeeds at Upliftment Through Wise Utilisation of Mineral Resources', African Mining 3(6), 85–87.Google Scholar
  47. Sepei, S.: 1999, Interview with Author. Johannesburg. 17 June, 1999.Google Scholar
  48. Shore, C. and S. Wright (eds): 1997, Anthropology of Policy.Critical Perspectives on Governance and Power (Routledge, London).Google Scholar
  49. Solomon, M.: 1997, ‘Ready for the Fall? Downscaling in the Minerals Industry', Indicator South Africa 14(2), 34–40.Google Scholar
  50. Stirrat, J. and H. Henkel.: 1997, ‘The Development Gift: The Problem of Reciprocity in the NGO World', Annals of American Academy of Political and Social Science 554, 66–80.Google Scholar
  51. Strathern, M.: 1992, ‘Parts and Wholes: Refiguring Relationships in a Post-plural World', in A. Kuper (ed.), Conceptualizing Society (Routledge, London).Google Scholar
  52. Thomson, I.: 1997, 'Mineral Exploration and the Challenge of Community Relations', paper presented at conference 'Mining and the Community', Quito Ecuador, 6–8 May.Google Scholar
  53. Uthungulu Regional Council: 1998, Uthungulu Regional Development Plan, 1998–2002 (Richards Bay, South Africa).Google Scholar
  54. Uthungulu Regional Council: 1998, Land Development Objectives (Richards Bay, South Africa).Google Scholar
  55. Wackernagel, M. and W. E. Rees: 1996. Our Ecological Footprint: Reducing Human Impact on the Earth (New Society Publishers, Gabriola Island, BC and Philadelphia, PA).Google Scholar
  56. Wilson, J.: 1998, 'New Frontiers for Placer Dome and the mining industry', CIM Bulletin, 45–46.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Paul Kapelus
    • 1
  1. 1.African Institute of Corporate CitizenshipGautengSouth Africa

Personalised recommendations