Advertisement

Annals of Software Engineering

, Volume 13, Issue 1–4, pp 309–327 | Cite as

An Architecture for Supporting Multi-Device, Client-Adaptive Services

  • Guido Menkhaus
Article

Abstract

The original idea of the World Wide Web was to create a universe of network-accessible information. Since its inception, the World Wide Web has evolved from a means to help people access and use information into an interactive medium. This has caused a dramatic increase in the development effort for interactive services, which now have to support multiple clients with widely varying computing and user interface capabilities. Personalization features tend to render this task even more complex. The paper presents the MUSA (Multiple User Interfaces, Single Application) system, which addresses both issues with the introduction of an event graph that abstracts user interface and personalization issues from the implementation of the service on different client-devices.

Keywords

Operating System User Interface Personalization Feature World Wide Development Effort 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abowd, G. (1999), “Software Engineering Issues for Ubiquitous Computing, ” In Proceedings of the 1999 International Conference on Software Engineering, pp. 75- 84.Google Scholar
  2. Ball, T., P. Danielson, L. Jagadeesan, R. Jagadeesan, K. Laeufer, P. Mataga, and K. Rehor (2000), “Sisl: Several Interfaces, Single Logic, ” Internatinal Journal of Speech Technology 3, 93–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bass, L., P. Clemens, and R. Kazman (1998), Sofware Architecture in Practice, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.Google Scholar
  4. Britton, K., R. Case, A. Citron, R. Floyed, Y. Li, C. Seekamp, B. Topol, and K. Tracey (2001), “Transcoding. Extending E-Business to New Environments, ” IBM Systems Journal 40, 1, 153–178.Google Scholar
  5. Compaq (2001), “Project Mercury: Exploring the Future of Handheld Devices, ” http://www.crl.research.digital.com/projacts/mercury/Google Scholar
  6. Fontoura, M., W. Pree, and B. Rumpe (2001), The UML Profile for Framework Architectures, chapter “Hints and Guidelines for the Framework Development and Adaptation Process, ” Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.Google Scholar
  7. Gamma, E., R. Helm, R. Johnson, and J. Vlissides (1995), Design Patterns: Elements of Reusable Object-Oriented Software, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.Google Scholar
  8. Garlan, D. (2000), “Software Architecture: A Roadmap, ” In Conference on the Future of Software Engineering, Ireland, pp. 91- 101.Google Scholar
  9. Garzotto, F., P. Paolini, and D. Schwabe (1993), “HDM - A Model-Based Approach to Hypertext Application Design, ” ACM Transactions on Information Systems 11, 1, 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. IBM (2001), “IBM Websphere Transcoding Publisher, Version 3.5, ” http://www-4.ibm.com/software/webservers/transcoding/Google Scholar
  11. Kaasinen, E., M. Aaltonen, J. Kolari, S. Melakoski, and T. Laakko (2000), “Two Approaches to Bringing Internet Services to WAP Devices, ” http://www.www9.org/w9cdrom/228/228.htmlGoogle Scholar
  12. McCann, P.J. and G.-C. Roman (1998), “Compositional Programming Abstractions for Mobile Computing, ” Software Engineering 24, 2, 97–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Oracle (2001), “Oracle Mobile Online Studio, Developer's Guide, ” http://studio.oraclemobile.com/omp/site/Documentation/developers guide.htmGoogle Scholar
  14. Palm (2000), “Wireless Handhelds, ” http://www.palm.com/products/palmviixGoogle Scholar
  15. Pree, W. and K. Koskimies (1999), Building Application Frameworks, Object Oriented Foundations of Framework Design, chapter “Framelets - Small is Beautiful, ” M. Fayad, D. Schmidt, and R. Johnson, Eds., Wiley Computer Publishing, pp. 411- 414.Google Scholar
  16. Roman, G., G. Picco, and A. Murphy (2000), “Software Engineering for Mobility: A Roadmap. ”Google Scholar
  17. Rossi, G., D. Schwabe, and A. Garrido (1999), “Designing Computational Hypermedia Applications, ” Journal of Digital Information (JODI) 4, 1.Google Scholar
  18. Szyperski, C. (1998), Component Software - Beyond Object-Oriented Programming, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.Google Scholar
  19. Taylor, R., K.A. Nies, G.A. Bolcer, C.A. Macfarlane, and K.M. Anderson (1995), “Chiron-1: A Software Architecture for User Interface Development, Maintenance, and Run-Time Support, ” ACM Transactions on Computer- Human Interaction 2, 2, 105–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Ubinet (1999), “The Ubiquitous Internet Will be Wireless, ” Computer 128, 10, 126–127.Google Scholar
  21. Wang, K. (1998), “An Event Driven Model for Dialogue Systems, ” Proceedings of the International Conference of Spoken Language Processing 2, 393–396.Google Scholar
  22. Weiser, M. (1991), “The Computer of the 21st Century, ” Scientific American 265, 3, 94–104.Google Scholar
  23. Weiser, M. (1993), “Some Computer Science Issues in Ubiquitous Computing, ” Communications of the ACM 36, 7, 75–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Winjstra, J.G. (2000), “Supporting Diversity with Component Frameworks as Architectural Elements, ” In Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference of Software Engineering, pp. 51- 60.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Guido Menkhaus
    • 1
  1. 1.Software Research LabConstance UniversityConstanceGermany

Personalised recommendations