Population Research and Policy Review

, Volume 21, Issue 1–2, pp 109–128 | Cite as

The Hispanic population: 1990–2000 growth and change

  • Betsy Guzmán
  • Eileen Diaz McConnell


Data sources indicate that there were significant changes in the Hispanic populationbetween 1990 and 2000. Using short-form data from the 1990 and 2000 censuses,we explore changes in the size and distribution of the Latino population. The mostimportant shifts in the Hispanic population are the continued increase of the Latinopopulation in the United States, the significant growth of Hispanic population whoidentify as `other' Latino, and the growing importance of the Midwest and South aspopular receiving areas for Latinos. Additionally, our comparison of householdcomposition over the ten-year period shows little change. We offer potentialexplanations, both substantive and methodological, for these important transitionsin the Latino population over the decade.

Census Hispanic Latino 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Alarcón, Rafael (2000), Migrants of the information age: Indian and Mexican engineers and regional development in Silicon Valley, The Center for Comparative Immigration Studies Working Paper No. 16, University of California-San Diego. May.Google Scholar
  2. Aponte, Robert and Siles, Marcelo E. (1994), Latinos in the heartland: The Browning of the Midwest. JSRI Research Report #5, The Julian Samora Research Institute, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan.Google Scholar
  3. Bachu, Amara (1995), Fertility of American Women: June 1994. Current Population Reports, P20-482. U.S. Census Bureau. Government Printing Office. Washington, D.C. <>Google Scholar
  4. Bachu, Amara and O'Connell, Martin (2000), Fertility of American Women: June 1998. Current Population Reports. P20-526. U.S. Census Bureau. Washington, D.C. <>Google Scholar
  5. Bean, Frank D., Passel, Jeffrey, and Edmonston, Barry (1990), Undocumented Migration to the United States: IRCA and the Experience of the 1980's. Washington D.C.: The Urban Institute Press.Google Scholar
  6. Binational Study: Migration Between Mexico and the United States (1997), A Report of the Binational Study on Migration. Commission on Immigration Reform.Google Scholar
  7. Braddock, Douglas (1999), Occupational employment projections to 2008, Monthly Labor Review 122(11): 51-77. Scholar
  8. Broadway, Michael J. (1995), Fromcity to countryside: recent changes in the structure and location of the meat-and fish-processing industries, pp. 17-40 in D.D. Stull, M.J. Broadway, and D. Griffith (eds.), Any Way You Cut It: Meat Processing and Small-Town America Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.Google Scholar
  9. Brownrigg, Leslie A. and Martin, Elizabeth A. (1989), Proposed study plan for ethnographic evaluation of the behavioral causes of undercount. Paper prepared for the Census Advisory Committee of the American Statistical Association and the Census Advisory Committee on Population Statistics at the Joint Advisory Committee meeting, April 13-14, Alexandria, Virginia.Google Scholar
  10. Bureau of Labor Statistics (2001), National Current Employment Statistics. <>Google Scholar
  11. Bustamante, Jorge A., Guillermina Jasso, Edward J. Taylor, and Paz Trigueros (1997), Characteristics of Migrants. Binational Study: Migration Between Mexico and The United States. A Report of the Binational Study on Migration. Commission on Immigration Reform.Google Scholar
  12. Camarota, Steven A. (2001), Immigrants in the United States-2000: A snapshot of America's foreign-born population. Backgrounder. Center for Immigration Studies, Washington D.C. (January). <>Google Scholar
  13. Census 2000 Operational Plan (December 2000), United States Census 2000. <>Google Scholar
  14. Chapa, Jorge (2000), Hispanic/Latino ethnicity and identifiers in Margo J. Anderson (ed.), Encyclopedia of the U.S. Census. Congressional Quarterly Press, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  15. Charvat-Burke, Sandra and Goudy, Willis J. (1999), Immigration and community in Iowa: How many have come and what is the impact? Annual Meetings of the American Sociological Association, Chicago, IL.Google Scholar
  16. Chavez, Leo R. (1992), Shadowed Lives: Undocumented Immigrants in American Society. Orlando, FL: Harcourt Brace College Publishers.Google Scholar
  17. Cornelius, Wayne A. and Marcelli, Enrico A. (2001), The changing profile of Mexican migrants to the United States: New evidence from California and Mexico. Discussion paper no. 220 December 2000, L</del>atin American Research Review 36(3): Forthcoming.Google Scholar
  18. Cuello, Jos (1998), Latinos and Hispanics: A Primer on Terminology. Detroit, MI: Wayne State, unpublished manuscript. Last revised 9/17/98.Google Scholar
  19. de la Garza, Rodolfo, Desipio, Louis, Garcia, F., Garcia, J., and Falcon, A. (1992), Latino Voices: Mexican, Puerto Rican and Cuban Perspectives on American Politics. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  20. de la Puente, Manuel (no date), Using ethnography to explain why people are missed or erroneously included by the census: Evidence from small area ethnographic studies, Center for Survey Methods Research, U.S. Census Bureau.Google Scholar
  21. bulletin/bu52-3/fertility.htm}Google Scholar
  22. Donato, Katharine M., Durand, Jorge, and Massey, Douglas S. (1992), Stemming the tide? Assessing the deterrent effects of the immigration reform and control Act, Demography 29(2): 3-42.Google Scholar
  23. Durand, Jorge, Massey, Douglas S., and Parrado, Emilio A. (1999), The new era of Mexican migration to the United States, Journal of American History 86(2): 518-536.Google Scholar
  24. Duany, Jorge (n.d.). The census undercount, the underground economy and undocumented migration: The case of Dominicans in Santurce, Puerto Rico. Working Paper. <>Google Scholar
  25. Espiritu, Yen Lee (1992), Asian American Panethnicity: Bridging Institutions and Identities. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Ethnic and Hispanic Statistics Branch. Population Division, U.S. Bureau of the Census Current Population Survey (March 1995), Internet Release date: September 12, 2000. <>Google Scholar
  27. Executive Steering Committee for A.C.E. Policy (2001). Report of the executive Steering committee for accuracy and coverage evaluation policy. March. <>Google Scholar
  28. Fernandez, EdwardW. (1995), Using analytic techniques to evaluate the 1990 census coverage of young Hispanics. Population Division, U.S. Bureau of the Census. Technical Working Paper No. 11 (May). Scholar
  29. doc/library/ferrari2/ferrari2.htmGoogle Scholar
  30. Fisher, Sylvia, Dixon, John, and Fricker, Scott (2000), Results of field interviewer debriefings about the Summer 2000 administration of the CPS race and ethnicity supplement. Office of Survey Methods Research, Bureau of Labor Statistics. September 13, 2000.Google Scholar
  31. Flores-Hughes, Grace (1996), Why the term 'Hispanic'? Hispanic 64.Google Scholar
  32. Gouveia, Lordes and Saenz, Rogelio (1999), Latino/a immigrants and new social formations in the Great Plains: An assessment of population growth and multiple impacts. Paper presented at the 1999 AnnualMeeting of the American Sociological Association. Chicago, IL. August.Google Scholar
  33. Gouveia, Lourdes and Stull, Donald D. (1995), Dances with cows: Beefpacking's impact on Garden City, Kansas and Lexington, Nebraska, in D.D. Stull, M.J. Broadway and D. Griffith (eds.), Any Way You Cut It: Meat Processing and Small-Town America. Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas.Google Scholar
  34. Granados, Christine (2000), 'Hispanic' vs 'Latino', Hispanic Magazine. December. Scholar
  35. Guzmán, Betsy (2001), The Hispanic population: Census 2000 Brief. United States Census Bureau. May. Scholar
  36. Hainer, Peter, Hines, Catherine, Martin, Elizabeth, and Shapiro, Gary (1990), Research on improving coverage in household surveys. Proceedings of the 4th Annual Research Conference. Washington, DC: U.S. Bureau of the Census, pp. 513-539.Google Scholar
  37. Hogan, Howard (1990), The post enumeration survey: An overview. Paper Presented at the Population of Association of America meeting. Toronto, CA, May 1990.Google Scholar
  38. Immigration and Naturalization Service (2000), Statistical Yearbook of the Immigration and Naturalization Service. Scholar
  39. Immigration and Naturalization Service, (2001), Enforcement. 1999 Statistical Yearbook of the Immigration and Naturalization Service. <> Google Scholar
  40. the_workforce.htmlGoogle Scholar
  41. Lollock, Lisa (2001), The foreign born population in the United States: March 2000. Current Population Survey Reports. P20-534. U.S. Census Bureau, Washington, D.C. Scholar
  42. Martin, Philip (1995), Proposition 187 in California, International Migration Review 29 (1).Google Scholar
  43. Martin, Philip (1997), Immigration and the changing face of rural America, Paper Presented at the 1997 National Public Policy Education Conference. Available at: Scholar
  44. Martin, Phillip, Taylor, J. Edward, and Fix, Michael (1996), Immigration and the changing face of rural America: Focus on the Midwestern States, JSRI Occasional Paper #21, The Julian Samora Research Institute, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan.Google Scholar
  45. Massey, Douglas S. (1998), March of folly: U.S. immigration policy after NAFTA, The American Prospect. 37 (March-April): 22-33.Google Scholar
  46. Office of Management and Budget (1997), Revisions to the standards for the classification of federal data on race and ethnicity, Federal Register 62, no. 210 (October 30, 1997): 58782-58790. Scholar
  47. Passel, Jeffrey S. and Fix, Michael (2001), U.S. Immigration at the Beginning of the 21st Century Testimony before the Subcommittee on Immigration and Claims Hearing on 'The U.S. Population and Immigration' Committee on the Judiciary U.S. House of Representatives.Google Scholar
  48. Passel, Jeffrey S. and Zimmerman, Wendy (2000), Are immigrants leaving California? Paper presented at the Annual Meetings of the Population Association of America. Los Angeles, CA.Google Scholar
  49. Rodriguez, Clara (2000), Changing Race: Latinos, the Census, and the History of Ethnicity in the United States. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  50. Rodriguez, Nestor P. and Hagan, Jacqueline (1991), Investigating census coverage and content among the undocumented: An ethnographic study of Latin tenants in Houston, Texas, Ethnographic Evaluation of the 1990 Decennial Census Report #3.Google Scholar
  51. Romero, Mary (1992), Ethnic evaluation of behavioral causes of census undercount of undocumented immigrants and Salvadorans in the Mission District of San Francisco, California, Ethnographic Evaluation of the 1990 Decennial Census Report #18.Google Scholar
  52. Rural Migration News (2000), Vanguard and meat packing. October. 6 (4). http://www.migration/ Scholar
  53. Salo, Matt T. (1996), Summary report of four focus groups on migrant worker enumeration conducted in Bradenton, FL and Cornelius, OR, Ethnographic Exploratory Research Report Series #23. Statistical Research Division, U.S. Census Bureau.Google Scholar
  54. Schmidley, A. Diane and Robinson, J. Gregory (1998), How well does the current population survey measure the foreign born population in the United States? Population Division Working Paper No. 22, U.S. Bureau of the Census.Google Scholar
  55. Stull, Donald D., Broadway, Michael J., and Griffith, David (eds.). (1995), Any Way You Cut It: Meat Processing and Small-Town America. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.Google Scholar
  56. Symens Smith, Amy (December 1998), The American community survey and intercensal population estimates: Where are the crossroads? Population Division Technical Working Paper No. 31. Scholar
  57. Treat, James B. and Stackhouse, Herbert F. (2001), Demographic comparison between selfresponse and personal visit interview in census 2000. Paper presented at the Annual Meetings of the Southern Demographic Association. Miami, FL.Google Scholar
  58. U.S. Census Bureau. (n.d.) 2000 Ad Campaign: Advertising and Promotion. (n.d.). Scholar
  59. U.S. Census Bureau (1998), Rust belt rebounds. Census Brief. CENBR/98-7, December.Google Scholar
  60. U.S. Census Bureau (February 14, 2001), Preliminary estimated coverage of census 2000 based on the accuracy and coverage evaluation (A.C.E.) survey. Scholar
  61. U.S. Commission on Agricultural Workers (1992), Report of the Commission on Agricultural Workers. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  62. U.S. Department of Commerce (October 1993), 1990 Census of population and housing: Programs to improve coverage in the 1990 census. Evaluation and Research Reports. Scholar
  63. U.S. Department of Commerce (October 1995), 1990 Census of population and housing. History, Part C (1990 CPH-R-2C.)Google Scholar
  64. U.S. Department of Commerce (January 1996), 1992 Census of manufactures: Iowa. Geographic Area Series. MC92-A-16. U.S. Department of Commerce (August 1997), Report to Congress-The Plan for Census 2000. Scholar
  65. U.S. Department of Commerce (September 2000). News: Well Done, America! Released September 19, 2000. Scholar
  66. U.S. Department of Commerce (June 2001), 1997 Economic census. Manufacturing. Scholar
  67. U.S. Department of Labor (2001), Monthly Labor Review. Manufacturing employment most prevalent in Midwest. July 25, 2001. Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Betsy Guzmán
    • 1
  • Eileen Diaz McConnell
    • 2
  1. 1.Indiana UniversityBloomingtonUSA
  2. 2.Indiana UniversityBloomingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations