New Forests

, Volume 16, Issue 1, pp 11–25 | Cite as

Phenological variation in height and diameter growth in provenances and families of loblolly pine

  • K.J.S. Jayawickrama
  • S.E. McKeand
  • J.B. Jett
Article

Abstract

The phenology of 5- and 6-year old loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.) trees was studied over two different growing seasons (1993 and 94) in southwest Georgia. These trees were from 7–9 open-pollinated families from each of four different provenances planted at two locations. The provenances were: Atlantic Coastal Plain (eastern SC), Gulf Hammock (north FL), Lower Gulf (south AL, MS) and Upper Gulf (north AL, MS). Provenances did not vary as to when height growth started in spring, but showed very significant differences for the date of growth cessation in fall. The Gulf Hammock source grew the most and also had the longest height growth period, while the Upper Gulf source was first to stop height growth and had the least annual height increment. Provenances were also significantly different for the date of cessation of diameter growth (a difference of 22 days between Gulf Hammock and Upper Gulf), and the order of cessation was the same as for height. Families within provenances were significantly different for date of cessation of height growth and diameter growth. When family means were considered across provenances, there was a correlation of 0.69 (p-value = 0.0001) between annual height increment and date of height growth cessation. There was a weaker association between faster growth and a longer growing season within provenances.

shoot phenology shoot growth diameter growth growth cessation Pinus taeda 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anonymous 1985. Climates of the States. 3rd ed. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Gale Research Company, Detroit, Michigan.Google Scholar
  2. Biging, G.S. and Dobbertin, M. 1992. A comparison of distance-dependent competition measures for height and basal area growth of individual conifer trees. For. Sci. 38: 695–720.Google Scholar
  3. Bridgwater, F.E. 1990. Shoot elongation patterns of loblolly pine families selected for contrasting growth potential. For. Sci. 36: 641–656.Google Scholar
  4. Campbell, R.K. 1986. Mapped genetic variation of Douglas-fir to guide seed transfer in southwest Oregon. Silvae Genet. 35: 85–96.Google Scholar
  5. Cannell, M.G.R. and Willet, S.C. 1976. Shoot growth phenology, dry matter distribution and root: Shoot ratios of provenances of Populus trichocarpa, Picea sitchensisgrowing in Scotland. Silvae Genet. 25: 49–59.Google Scholar
  6. Cannell, M.G.R., Thompson, S. and Lines, R. 1976. An analysis of inherent differences in shoot growth within some north temperate conifers, pp. 173–205. In: Cannell, M.G.R, and Last, F.T. (Eds) Tree Physiology and Yield Improvement. Academic Press, London.Google Scholar
  7. Emmingham, W.H. 1977. Comparison of selected Douglas-fir seed sources for cambial and leader growth patterns in four western Oregon environments. Can. J. For. Res. 7: 154–164.Google Scholar
  8. Foster, G.S. 1986. Trends in genetic parameters with stand development and their influence on early selection for volume growth in loblolly pine. For. Sci. 32: 944–959.Google Scholar
  9. Hamrick, J.L. and Libby, W.J. 1972. Variation and selection in western U.S. montane species. Silvae Genet. 21: 29–35.Google Scholar
  10. Hanover, J.W. 1963. Geographic variation in ponderosa pine leader growth. For. Sci. 9: 86–95.Google Scholar
  11. Irgens-Moller, H. 1967. Patterns of height growth initiation and cessation in Douglas-fir. Silvae Genet. 16: 56–58.Google Scholar
  12. Lambeth, C.C., Dougherty, P.M., Gladstone, W.T., McCullough, R.B. and Wells, O.O. 1984. Large-scale planting of North Carolina loblolly pine in Arkansas and Oklahoma: A case of gain versus risk. J. For. 82: 736–741.Google Scholar
  13. Li, P. and Adams, W.T. 1993. Genetic control of bud phenology in pole-size trees and seedlings of coastal Douglas-fir. Can. J. For. Res. 23: 1043–1051.Google Scholar
  14. Li, P. and Adams, W.T. 1994. Genetic variation in cambial phenology of coastal Douglas-fir. Can. J. For. Res. 24: 1864–1870.Google Scholar
  15. Li, P., Beaulieu, J., Corriveau, A. and Bousquet, J. 1993. Genetic variation in juvenile growth and phenology in a white spruce provenance-progeny test. Silvae Genet. 42: 52–60.Google Scholar
  16. Li, B., McKeand, S.E. and Weir, R.J. 1996. Genetic parameter estimates and selection efficiency for the loblolly pine breeding in the south-eastern U.S., pp. 164–168 In: Dieters, M.J., Matheson, A.C., Nikles, D.G., Harwood, C.E. and Walker, S.M. (Eds) Tree 25 Improvement for Sustainable Tropical Forestry. Proc. QFRI-IUFRO Conf., 27 October-1 November 1996, Caloundra, Queensland, Australia.Google Scholar
  17. Magnussen, S. and Yeatman, C.W. 1989. Height growth components in inter-and intra-provenance jack pine families. Can. J. For. Res. 19: 962–972.Google Scholar
  18. McKeand, S.E. and Bridgwater, F.E. 1993. Provenance and family variation for juvenile growth characteristics of Pinus taedaL. and the impact onearly selection for growth. Stud. For. Suec. 191: 5–10.Google Scholar
  19. McKeand, S.E. and Jett, J.B. 1993. Growth and stem sinuosity of diverse provenances of threeyear-old loblolly pine, pp. 208–213. In: Proc. 22nd Southern Forest Tree Improvement Conference, 14–17 June 1993, Atlanta, GA.Google Scholar
  20. McKeand, S.E., Weir, R.J. and Hatcher, A.V. 1989. Performance of diverse provenances of loblolly pine throughout the southeastern United States. South. J. Appl. For. 13: 46–51.Google Scholar
  21. Mergen, F., Burley, J. and Yeatman, C.W. 1964. Variation in growth characteristics and wood properties of Norway spruce. Tappi 47: 499–504.Google Scholar
  22. Neter, J., Wasserman, W. and Kutner, M.H. 1990. Applied Linear Statistical Models. 3rd ed. Richard D. Irwin, Inc. Homewood, IL, USA. 1181 p.Google Scholar
  23. Perry, T.O., Chi-Wu, W. and Schmitt, D. 1966. Height growth for loblolly pine provenances in relation to photoperiod and growing season. Silvae Genet. 15: 61–64.Google Scholar
  24. Sakai, K., Mukaide, H. and Tomita, K. 1968. Intraspecific competition in forest trees. Silvae Genet. 17:1–5.Google Scholar
  25. SAS Institute Inc. 1989. SAS/STAT User's Guide, Version 6, Fourth Edition. Cary, NC.Google Scholar
  26. Stonecypher, R.W., Piesch, R.F., Helland, G.G., Chapman, J.G. and Reno, H.J. 1996. Results from genetic tests of selected parents of Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii[Mirb.] Franco) in an applied tree improvement program. For. Sci. 42(2) (monograph 32), 35 p.Google Scholar
  27. Sweet, G.B. 1965. Provenance differences in Pacific Coast Douglas fir. Silvae Genet. 14: 46–56.Google Scholar
  28. Ununger, J., Ekberg, I. and Kang, H. 1988. Genetic control and age-related changes of juvenile growth characters in Picea abies. Scand. J. For. Res. 3: 55–66.Google Scholar
  29. Vargas-Hernandez, J. and Adams, W.T. 1994. Genetic relationships between wood density components and cambial growth rhythm in young coastal Douglas-fir. Can. J. For. Res. 24: 1871–1876.Google Scholar
  30. Wells, O.O. and Wakely, P.C. 1966. Geographic variation in survival, growth and fusiform-rust infection of planted loblolly pine. Forest Science Monograph No. 11.Google Scholar
  31. White, T.L., Ching, K.K. and Walters, J. 1979. Effect of provenance, years and planting location on bud burst of Douglas-fir. For. Sci. 25: 161–167.Google Scholar
  32. Worrall, J. 1970. Interrelationships among some phenological and wood property variables in Norway spruce. Tappi 53: 58–63.Google Scholar
  33. Worrall, J. 1975. Provenance and clonal variation in phenology and wood properties of Norway spruce. Silvae Genet. 24: 2–5.Google Scholar
  34. Zobel, B.J. and van Buijtenen, J.P. 1989. Wood Variation: Its Causes and Control. Springer-Verlag, New York, USA. 363 p.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • K.J.S. Jayawickrama
    • 1
  • S.E. McKeand
    • 1
  • J.B. Jett
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of ForestryNorth Carolina State UniversityRaleighUSA
  2. 2.College of Forest ResourcesNorth Carolina State UniversityRaleighUSA

Personalised recommendations