Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing

, Volume 17, Issue 2, pp 93–96 | Cite as

Enamel Nail Polish Does Not Interfere With Pulse Oximetry Among Normoxic Volunteers

  • Thomas M. Brand
  • Mary E. Brand
  • Gregory D. Jay
Article

Abstract

Objective.To determine if enamel nail polish interferes withpulse oximetry. Design. Laboratory investigation.Participants. 12 healthy nonsmoking volunteers. Methods.Spectrophotometry was performed on polystyrene cuvettes painted with 3uniform layers of nail polish enamel in triplicate. Absorbances werecompared at 660 and 940 nm for 10 colors across the visible spectrum anddocumented by the Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers colorcode against Pantone matches on a color scanner.Colors were then selected that had the greatestA660–A940 difference and pulse oximetry(Nellcor N-209A. Pleasanton , CA) was performed on nails painted withthese colors on 12 subjects using an unpainted digit as a control.Results. When tested by the oximeter, there were noSpO2 differences detected between nail polish colors, norwere there any differences between the painted and the unpainted controldigits across subjects (F = 0.51, ANOVA; p= 0.67). Blue (B),green (G), and lime green (G’) possessed the largestA660–A940 difference and potentially couldinterfere with pulse oximetry but did not do so in the clinical model.Conclusion. Enamel finger nail polish pigments do not interferewith pulse oximetry as previously reported, theA660–A940 difference must be greater than1.88 ± 0.23 SD AU in order to affect pulse oximetry.

Pulse oximetry nail polish hypoxia circulation non-invasive monitoring 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.
    Eisenkraft JB. Pulse oximeter desaturation due to methemoglobinemia. Anesthesiology 1988; 68: 279–282Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Barker SJ, Tremper KK, Hyatt JH. Effects of methemoglobinemia on pulse oximetry and mixed venous oximetry. Anesthesiology 1989; 70: 112–117Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Barker SJ, Tremper KK, Hyatt JH. The effect of carbon monoxide inhalation on pulse oximetry and transcutaneous PO2. Anesthesiology 1987; 66: 677–679Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Schnapp LM, Cohen NH. Pulse oximetry uses and abuses. Chest 1990; 98 (5): 1244–1250Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    New W. Pulse Oximetry. J Clin Monit 1985; 1: 126–131Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Jay GD, Hughes L, Renzi FP. Pulse oximetry is accurate in acute anemia from hemorrhage. Ann Emer Med 1994; 24 (1): 32–35Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hanowell L. Ambient light affects pulse oximeters. Anesthesiology 1987; 67: 864–65Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Cote CJ, Goldstein EA, Fuchsman NH, Hoaglin DC. The effects of nail polish on pulse oximetry. Anesth Anal 1988; 67: 683–686Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kataria BK, Lampkins R. Nail polish does not effect pulse oximeter saturation. Anesth Anal 1986; 65: 824Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    White PF, Boyle AW. Nail polish and oximetry. Anesth Anal 1989; 68: 545–547Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Peters SM. The effect of acrylic nails on the measurement of oxygen saturation as determined by pulse oximetry. AANA J 1997; 65 (4): 361–363Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Thomas M. Brand
    • 1
  • Mary E. Brand
    • 1
  • Gregory D. Jay
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Medicine, Section of Emergency MedicineBrown University School of MedicineProvidence

Personalised recommendations