Advertisement

Journal of Community Health

, Volume 27, Issue 4, pp 277–290 | Cite as

Effectiveness of an Intervention to Increase Pap Test Screening Among Chinese Women in Taiwan

  • Su-I HouEmail author
  • Maria E. Fernandez
  • Elizabeth Baumler
  • Guy S. Parcel
Article

Abstract

This study assessed the effectiveness of a theory-based direct mail campaign in encouraging non-compliant women, aged 30 and older or younger if married, to obtain a Pap test. Participants were female family members of inpatients admitted to one of the major teaching hospitals in Taiwan during August–September 1999. A total of 424 women were recruited in the randomized intervention trial. Three months following implementation of the intervention, women in the intervention group reported a higher rate of Pap test screening than women in the comparison group (50% versus 32%) (p = 0.002). Women in the intervention group also showed higher perceived pros of a Pap test at follow-up (p = 0.031). Although women in both groups showed an increased knowledge and intention to obtain a Pap, only the intervention group had significantly higher follow-up scores on perceived pros and susceptibility. The results shows that the intervention was effective in increasing Pap test screening among Chinese women within three months. The results also support the use of Intervention Mapping, a systematic program development framework for planning effective interventions.

Pap test screening intervention mapping program evaluation Chinese women 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.
    Herrero R. Epidemiology of cervical cancer [Review]. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 1996;21:1–6.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Liu MC, Hai A, Huang AT. Cancer epidemiology in the Far-East--contrast with the United States. Oncology 1993;7:99–110.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Lai MY, Zhou BS. Effectiveness of screening for cervicalcancer: a case-controlStudy (thesis). Taipei, Taiwan: National Yang-Ming Medical College. 1990.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Panel. National Institutes of Health consensus development conference statement: Cervical cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 1996;21: vii–xix.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The nationalbreast and cervicalcancer early detection program; At-A-Glance, 1998. US Dept HHS 1998;1–6.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Yi JK. Factors associated with cervicalcancer screening behavior among Vietnamese women. J Community Health 1994;19:189–200.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Pham CT, McPhee SJ. Knowledge, attitudes, and practices of breast and cervical cancer screening among Vietnamese women. J Cancer Educ 1992;7:305–310.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Chou P, Chen L. Mass screening for cervicalcancer in Taiwan from 1974–1984. Cancer 1984;64: 962–968.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lee TF, Kuo HS, Chen HC, Chen TS, Chou BS. Factors of Pap screening behavior among women in KinMen, Taiwan. PublicHealth of Republicof China 1997; 16:198–209.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hou S, Fernandez M, Baumler E, Guy S. Parcel. Cervical cancer screening among women in Taiwan--pilot study. Health Care for Women International (under revisions).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Wang PD, Lin RS. Sociodemographic factors of pap smear screening in Taiwan. PublicHealth 1996;110:123–127.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kelly AW, Fores CM, Wollan PC, et al. A program to increase breast and cervical cancer screening for Cambodian women in a mid-western community. Mayo Clin Proc 1996;71:437–44.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Seow A, Wong ML, Smith WCS, Lee HP. Beliefs and attitudes as determinants of cervical cancer screening: A community-based study in Singapore. Prev Med 1995;24:134–141.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Yi JK. Acculturation and Pap screening practices among college-aged Vietnamese women in the United States. Cancer Nurs 1998;21:335–341.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Byles JE, Redman S, Sanson-Fisher RW, Boyle C. Effectiveness of two direct-mail strategies to encourage women to have cervical(Pap) smears. Health Promotion 1995; 10:5–16.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Bowman J, Sanson-Fisher RW, Boyle C, Pope S. A randomized controlled trial of strategies to prompt attendance for a Pap smear.J Med Screen 1995; 2:211–218.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Buehler SK, Parsons WL. Effectiveness of a call/recall system in improving compliance with cervical cancer screening: a randomized controlled trial. Can Med Assoc J 1997; 157: 521–526.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lantz PM, Stencil D, Lippert MT, Beversdorf S, Jaros L, Remington PL. Breast and cervical cancer screening in a low-income managed care sample: The efficacy of physician letters and phone calls. Am J PublicHealth 1995;85:834–836.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Marcus AC, Crane LA. A review of cervicalcancer screening intervention research: implications for public health programs and future research. Prev Med 1998;27:13–31.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ruggiero Laurie. Transtheoretical Model: Applications in the prevention and treatment of cancer. Med Pediatr Oncol Suppl 1998;1:69–74.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Prochaska JO. Strong and weak principles for progressing from pre-contemplation to action based on twelve problem behaviors. Health Psychol 1994;13:47–51.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Suarez L; Goldman DA, and Weiss NS. Validity of Pap smear and mammogram self-reports in a low-income Hispanic population. Am J Prev Med 1995; 11:94–98.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Walter SD; Clarke EA; Hatcher J, and Stitt LW. A comparison of physician and patient reports of Pap smear histories. J Clin Epidemiol 1988; 41:401–410.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Human Sciences Press, Inc. 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Su-I Hou
    • 1
    Email author
  • Maria E. Fernandez
    • 2
  • Elizabeth Baumler
    • 2
  • Guy S. Parcel
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Health Promotion and Behavior, School of Health and Human Performance, College of EducationThe University of GeorgiaAthens
  2. 2.Center for Health Promotion and Prevention Research (CHPPR), School of Public HealthThe University of Texas--Houston Health Science CenterUSA
  3. 3.School of Public HealthThe University of Texas--Houston Health Science CenterUSA

Personalised recommendations