Journal of Science Education and Technology

, Volume 11, Issue 3, pp 237–253 | Cite as

Robotic Design Studio: Exploring the Big Ideas of Engineering in a Liberal Arts Environment

Article

Abstract

In this paper we argue that it is important to introduce liberal arts students to the essence of engineering. Toward this end we have developed Robotic Design Studio, a course where students learn how to design, assemble, and program robots made out of LEGO® parts, sensors, motors, and small embedded computers. The course has no prerequisites and has attracted students from a wide range of backgrounds. The course culminates in an exhibition where students show off the robots that they have designed and built. These creative projects tie together aspects of a surprisingly wide range of disciplines. Robotic Design Studio represents an alternative vision of how robot design can be used to teach engineering in a way that is more inclusive and provides more room for artistic expression than contest-centered formats. A web site with detailed descriptions of student projects and all other course materials can be found at http://cs.wellesley.edu/rds.

robots design engineering liberal arts undergraduate education 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. Abelson, H. Sussman, G. J., and Sussman, J. (1996). Structure and Interpretation of Computer Programs, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  2. Beer, R. D., Chiel, H. J., and Drushel, R. F. (1999). Using autonomous robotics to teach science and engineering. Communications of the ACM 42: 85-92.Google Scholar
  3. Braitenberg, V. (1984). Vehicles: Experiments in Synthetic Psychology, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  4. Cheng, M., Openshaw, A., andWang, S. (2000). Star dragon (website for Robotic Design Studio final project). Retrieved from http://nike.wellesley.edu/rds/rds00/star dragon/Google Scholar
  5. Druin, A., and Hendler, J. (Eds.) (2000). Robots for Kids: Exploring New Technologies for Learning Experiences, Morgan Kaufman/Academic Press, San Francisco.Google Scholar
  6. Farrington, B. (1949). Greek Science, Penguin, Harmondsworth.Google Scholar
  7. Goldberg, S. (Ed.). (1990).The New Liberal Arts Program: A 1990 Report, Alfred P. Sloan Foundation, New York.Google Scholar
  8. Henderson, J. M., Desrochers, D. A., McDonald, K. A., and Bland, M. M. (1994). Building the confidence of women engineering students with a new course to increase understanding of physical devices. Journal of Engineering Education 83: 337-342.Google Scholar
  9. Jones, J., Flynn, A., and Seiger, B. (1999). Mobile Robots: Inspiration to Implementation, 2nd ed., A. K. Peters, Wellesley, MA.Google Scholar
  10. Koerner, J. D. (Ed.) (1981). The New Liberal Arts: An Exchange of Views, Alfred P. Sloan Foundation, New York.Google Scholar
  11. Kolodner, J. L., Crismond, D., Gray, J., Holbrook, J., and Puntambekar, S. (1998). Learning by design from theory to practice. In Proceedings of the International Conference of the Learning Sciences 1998, The EduTech Institute, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, pp. 16-22.Google Scholar
  12. Macaulay, D. (1988). The Way Things Work, Houghlin Mifflin, Boston.Google Scholar
  13. Martin, F. (1992). The 6.270 robot builder's guide for the 1992 LEGO robot design competition, epistemology and learning group, MIT Media Laboratory. (Retrieved from ftp://cherupakha.media.mit.edu/pub/el-publications/Manuals/robot-builders-guide/. See http://web.mit.edu/6.270/www/ for more information on 6.270)Google Scholar
  14. Martin, F. (1994). Circuits to Control: Learning Engineering by Designing LEGO Robots, Ph.D. Dissertation, MIT Media Laboratory, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  15. Martin, F. (1995). The art of LEGO design. The Robotics Practitioner: The Journal for Robot Builders 1. (Retrieved from ftp://cherupakha.media.mit.edu/pub/people/fredm/artoflego. pdf)Google Scholar
  16. Martin, F. (2000). Robotic Explorations: A Hands-On Introduction to Engineering, Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ. (For more information on the Handy Boards used in this book, see http://www.handyboard.com/)Google Scholar
  17. Martin, F., Mikhak, B., Resnick, M., Silverman, B., and Berg, R. (2000). To mindstorms and beyond: Evolution of a construction kit for magical machines. In Druin, A., and Hendler, J. (Eds.). (Retrieved from http://llk.media.mit.edu/projects/ cricket/)Google Scholar
  18. McCartney, R. (1996). Introduction to robotics in computer science and engineering education. Computer Science Education 7: 135-137.Google Scholar
  19. Norman, D. A. (1990). The Design of Everyday Things, Doubleday, New York.Google Scholar
  20. Papert, S. (1980). Mindstorms: Children, Computers and Powerful Ideas, Basic Books, New York.Google Scholar
  21. Papert, S. (1994). The Children's Machine, Basic Books, New York.Google Scholar
  22. Resnick, M., Berg, R., and Eisenberg, M. (2000). Beyond black boxes: Bringing transparency and aesthetics back to scientific investigation. The Journal of the Learning Sciences 9: 17-35.Google Scholar
  23. Resnick, M., Martin, F., Sargent, R., and Silverman, B. (1996). Programmable bricks: Toys to think with. IBM Systems Journal 35: 443-452.Google Scholar
  24. Resnick, M., and Ocko, S. (1991). LEGO/Logo: Learning through and about design. In Harel, I., and Papert, S. (Eds.), Constructionism, Ablex, Norwood, NJ.Google Scholar
  25. Reuben, J. (1996). The Making of the Modern University: Intellectual Transformation, and the Marginalization of Morality, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
  26. Saddler, P., Coyle, H., and Schwartz, M.(2000). Engineering competitions in the middle school classroom: Key elements in developing effective design challenges. The Journal of The Learning Sciences 9: 299-327.Google Scholar
  27. Sippel, J. (1999). Taking on engineering's gender gap. News-Smith 13. (Smith College, Northhampton, MA.Retrieved from http://www.smith.edu/newssmith/NSSpring99/cover.html. See http://www.science.smith.edu/departments/Engin/ for more information on Smith's engineering program)Google Scholar
  28. Stein, L. A. (1998). What we've swept under the rug: Radically rethinking CS1. Computer Science Education 8: 118-129.Google Scholar
  29. Stein, L. A. (Ed.) (in preparation). Proceedings of the 2001 AAAI Spring Symposium on Robotics in Education, March 26-28, 2001, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Computer Science DepartmentWellesley CollegeWellesley
  2. 2.Physics DepartmentWellesley CollegeWellesley

Personalised recommendations