Pharmaceutical Research

, Volume 1, Issue 4, pp 159–163 | Cite as

Stability of Liposomes on Storage: Freeze Dried, Frozen or as an Aqueous Dispersion

  • D. J. A. Crommelin
  • E. M. G. van Bommel


For various types of liposomes carboxyfluorescein (CF) latency and physical stability on storage were investigated. Three regimens were compared: storage at 4–6°C in an iso-osmotic aqueous buffer, freezing of the dispersions at −5 or −30°C, or freeze drying of the dispersions. Reverse phase evaporation vesicles (REV) were used with mean diameters between 0.2 and 0.3 µm. Liposomes consisted of egg phosphatidylcholine (PC) and phophatidylserine (PS) without or with cholesterol (chol) (9/1 and 10/1/4, respectively) or of distearoylphosphatidylcholine (DSPC) and dipalmitoylphosphatidylglycerol (DPPG) without or with chol (10/l/[5]). PC/PS liposome dispersions lost 25% of the entrapped CF within 10 days. The leakage rate decreased with the inclusion of cholesterol in the bilayer. Both after a freezing/thawing cycle and after freeze-drying no acceptable CF latency could be obtained. The cryoprotectants that were tested failed to raise CF latency significantly. However, the physical integrity of the liposomes could be maintained by proper choice of the cryoprotectant. When stored at 4–6°C, DSPC/DPPG/(chol) dispersions were stable for at least 6 months. Upon freezing/thawing less than 10 % CF was lost. Freeze drying without cryoprotectants reduced CF latency dramatically on rehydration. The physical structure was maintained and maximum latencies of 70 % could be obtained with the use of lactose as a cryoprotectant.


Cholesterol Evaporation Lactose Phosphatidylcholine Chol 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. (1).
    Frøkjaer, S., Hjorth, E. L., Worts, O. (1982) in: Optimization of drug delivery, Bundgaard, H., Bagger Hansen, A., Kofod, H. (ed.) Munkgaard, Copenhagen.Google Scholar
  2. (2).
    Weinstein, J. N., Yoshikami, S., Henkart, P., Blumenthal, R., Hagins, W. A. (1977) Science 195, 489–492.Google Scholar
  3. (3).
    Szoka, F., Papahadjopoulos, D. (1978) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 75, 4194–4198.Google Scholar
  4. (4).
    Ralston, E., Hjelmeland, L. M., Klausner, R. D., Weinstein, J. D., Blumenthal, R. (1981) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 649, 133–137.Google Scholar
  5. (5).
    Crommelin, D. J. A., Influence of lipid composition and ionic strength on the physical stability of liposomes. J. Pharm. Sci., accepted for publication.Google Scholar
  6. (6).
    Wilschut, J. (1982) in: Methodologie des liposomes, Leeserman, L. D. and Barbet J. (ed.) Editions INSERM, vol. 107, 9–24, Paris.Google Scholar
  7. (7).
    Papahadjopoulos, D., Jacobson, K., Nir, S., Isac, T. (1973) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 311, 330–348.Google Scholar
  8. (8).
    Yatvin, M. B., Weinstein, J. N., Dennis, W. H., Blumenthal, R. (1978) Science 202, 1290–1292.Google Scholar
  9. (9).
    Weinstein, J. N., Magin, R. L., Yatvin, M. B., Zaharko, D. S. (1979) Science 204, 188–191.Google Scholar
  10. (10).
    Morris, G. J. (1982) Cryobiology 19, 215–218.Google Scholar
  11. (11).
    Gabizon, A., Dagan, A., Goren, D., Bahrenholz, Y., Fuks, Z. (1982) Cancer Research 42, 4734–4739.Google Scholar
  12. (12).
    Forssen, E. A., Tökes, Z. A. (1981) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 78, 1873–1877.Google Scholar
  13. (13).
    Forssen, E. A., Tökes, Z. A. (1983) Cancer Research 43, 546–550.Google Scholar
  14. (14).
    Van Hoesel, Q. G. C. M., Steerenberg, P. A., Crommelin, D. J. A., Van Dijk, A., Van Oort, W., Klein, S., Douze, J. M. C., Hillen, F. C., Cancer Research, accepted for publication.Google Scholar
  15. (15).
    Franks, F. (1982) in: Water, vol. 7, Franks, F. (ed.), Plenum Press, N.Y.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1984

Authors and Affiliations

  • D. J. A. Crommelin
    • 1
  • E. M. G. van Bommel
  1. 1.Dept. of Pharmaceutics, Subfaculty of PharmacyUniversity of UtrechtUtrechtThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations