, Volume 56, Issue 3, pp 319–328

The Supervenience Argument and the Generalization Problem

  • Jürgen Schröder


This paper tries to show that Kim’s strategy of preventing the problem of generalization of mental causation is not successful and that his original supervenience argument can be applied to cases of nonmental macrolevel causation, with the effect that nonmental macroproperties which only supervene on, but are not identical with, configurations of microproperties turn out to be epiphenomenal after all.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Armstrong, D.: 1978, A Theory of Universals, Vol. II, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  2. Baker, L. R.: 1993, ‘Metaphysics and Mental Causation’, in J. Heil and A. Mele (eds), Mental Causation, Clarendon Press, Oxford, pp. 75-95.Google Scholar
  3. Ehring, D.: 1996, ‘Mental Causation, Determinables and Property Instances’, Noûs 30, 461-480.Google Scholar
  4. Fodor, J.: 1989, ‘Making Mind Matter More’, Philosophical Topics 67, 59-79.Google Scholar
  5. Jackson, F.: 1996, ‘Mental Causation’, Mind 105, 377-413.Google Scholar
  6. Jackson, F. and P. Pettit: 1990, ‘Program Explanation: A General Perspective’, Analysis 50, 107-117.Google Scholar
  7. Jackson, F. and P. Pettit: 1996, ‘Causation in the Philosophy of Mind’, in A. Clark and P. Millican (eds), Connectionism, Concepts, and Folk Psychology, Clarendon Press, Oxford, pp. 75-99.Google Scholar
  8. Kim, J.: 1992, ‘Multiple Realization and the Metaphysics of Reduction’, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 52, 1-26.Google Scholar
  9. Kim, J.: 1993, ‘Mental Causation in a Physical World’, Philosophical Issues 3, 157-176.Google Scholar
  10. Kim, J.: 1995; ‘Mental Causation: What? Me Worry?’, Philosophical Issues 6, 123-151.Google Scholar
  11. Kim, J.: 1997, ‘Does the Problem of Mental Causation Generalize?’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 97, 281-297.Google Scholar
  12. Le Pore, E. and B. Loewer: 1987, ‘Mind Matters’, Journal of Philosophy 84, 630-642.Google Scholar
  13. Noordhof, P.: 1999, ‘Micro-based Properties and the Supervenience Argument: A Response to Kim’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 99, 109-114.Google Scholar
  14. Schröder, J.: forthcoming, ‘Mental Causation: The Supervenience Argument and the Proportionality Constraint’, in S. Maasen, W. Prinz and G. Roth (eds), Voluntary Action: An Issue at the Interface of Nature and Culture, Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  15. Segal, G. and E. Sober: 1991, ‘The Causal Efficacy of Content’, Philosophical Studies 63, 1-30.Google Scholar
  16. Van Gulick, R.: 1992, ‘Three Bad Arguments for Intentional Property Epiphenomenalism’, Erkenntnis 36, 311-331.Google Scholar
  17. Yablo, S.: 1992, ‘Mental Causation’, Philosophical Review 101, 245-280.Google Scholar
  18. Yablo, S.: 1997, ‘Wide Causation’, Philosophical Perspectives 11, 251-281.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jürgen Schröder
    • 1
  1. 1.HeidelbergGermany

Personalised recommendations