Advertisement

Journal of Chemical Ecology

, Volume 28, Issue 6, pp 1269–1285 | Cite as

Variation in a Female Sexual Attractiveness Pheromone Controls Male Mate Choice in Garter Snakes

  • Michael P. LeMaster
  • Robert T. Mason
Article

Abstract

Male red-sided garter snakes (Thamnophis sirtalis parietalis) display a courtship preference for larger females during the breeding season. Utilizing behavioral experiments and chemical analyses, we tested the hypothesis that males can discriminate among females of varying size solely by means of the sexual attractiveness pheromone, a previously characterized sex pheromone composed of a homologous series of long-chain saturated and ω-9 cis-unsaturated methyl ketones contained in the skin lipids of females. When presented with skin lipid extracts from large and small females, a greater proportion of males displayed courtship behaviors to large female extracts. This demonstrates that there is an intrinsic property of the female skin lipids that allows males to differentiate among large and small females. Analysis of the sexual attractiveness pheromone revealed that the necessary variation exists for this pheromone to function as a reliable indicator to males of female body size. Specifically, we observed a strong correlation between female snout–vent length and the relative concentration of saturated and ω-9 cis-unsaturated methyl ketones composing the pheromone; smaller females expressed pheromone profiles higher in saturated methyl ketones, while larger females expressed pheromone profiles dominated by unsaturated methyl ketones. The results of this study suggest that male red-sided garter snakes utilize compositional variation in the female sexual attractiveness pheromone to differentiate among potential mates of varying size.

Mate choice sexual attractiveness pheromone qualitative variation methyl ketones red-sided garter snake Thamnophis sirtalis parietalis 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. Albone, E. S. 1984. Mammalian Semiochemistry. John Wiley & Sons, New York.Google Scholar
  2. Andersson, M. 1994. Sexual Selection. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey.Google Scholar
  3. Bell, W. J. and Cardé, R. T. 1984. Chemical Ecology of Insects. Chapman and Hall, New York.Google Scholar
  4. Brown, W. S., and Maclean, F. M. 1983. Conspecific scent-trailing by newborn timber rattlesnakes, Crotalus horridus. Herpetologica 39:430–436.Google Scholar
  5. Cooper, W. E. and Vitt, L. J. 1997. Maximizing male reproductive success in the broad-headed skink (Eumeces laticeps): Preliminary evidence for mate guarding, size-assortative pairing, and opportunistic extra-pair mating. Amphibia-Reptilia 18:59–73.Google Scholar
  6. Crews, D. 1976.Hormonal control of male courtship behavior and female attractivity in the garter snake (Thamnophis sirtalis parietalis). Horm. Behav. 7:451–460.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Crews, D., Camazine, B., Diamond, M., Mason, R., Tokarz, R., and Garstka, W. 1984. Hormonal independence of courtship behavior in the male garter snake. Horm. Behav. 18:629–41.Google Scholar
  8. Dussourd, D. E., Harvis, C. A., Meinwald, J., and Eisner, T. 1991. Pheromonal advertisement of a nuptial gift by a male moth (Utetheisa ornatrix). Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 88:9224–9227.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Garstka, W. R., Camazine, B., and Crews, D. 1982. Interactions of behavior and physiology during the annual reproductive cycle of the red-sided garter snake (Thamnophis sirtalis parietalis). Herpetologica 38:104–123.Google Scholar
  10. Gregory, P. T. 1974. Patterns of spring emergence of the red-sided garter snake, Thamnophis sirtalis parietalis in the Interlake region of Manitoba. Can. J. Zool. 52:1063–1069.Google Scholar
  11. Gregory, P. T. 1977. Life-history of the red-sided garter snake (Thamnophis sirtalis parietalis) in an extreme environment, the Interlake region of Manitoba. Publications in Zoology, No. 13. National Museum of Canada, Ottawa, Canada.Google Scholar
  12. Gregory, P. T. 1984. Communal denning in snakes, pp. 57–75, in R. L. Seigel, L. Heunt, J. Knight, L. Malaret, and N. Zuschlag (eds.). Vertebrate Ecology and Systematics—A Tribute to Henry S. Fitch. University of Kansas Press, Lawrence, Kansas.Google Scholar
  13. Hawley, A. W. L. and Aleksiuk, M. 1976. Sexual receptivity in the female red-sided garter snake (Thamnophis sirtalis parietalis). Copeia 1976:401–404.Google Scholar
  14. Hill, G. E. 1990. Female house finches prefer colourful males: Sexual selection for a conditiondependent trait. Anim. Behav. 40:563–572.Google Scholar
  15. Holtzman, D. A. 2001. Thamnophis sirtalis sirtalis courtship behavior. Herpetol. Rev. 32:110.Google Scholar
  16. Huck, W. and Banks, E. M. 1982. Male dominance status, female choice and mating success in the brown lemming, Lemmus trimucronatus. Anim. Behav. 30:665–675.Google Scholar
  17. Joy, J. E. and Crews, D. 1988.Male mating success in red-sided garter snakes: Size is not important. Anim. Behav. 36:1839–1841.Google Scholar
  18. Karlson, P. and LÜscher, M. 1959. “Pheromone”: A new term for a class of biologically active substances. Nature 183:55–56.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. LÖfstedt, D., Vickers, N. J., Roelofs, W. L., and Baker, T. C. 1989. Diet related courtship success in the Oriental fruit moth, Grapholita molesta (Tortricidae). Oikos 55:402–408.Google Scholar
  20. Luiselli, L. 1996. Individual success in mating balls of the grass snake, Natrix natrix: Size is important. J. Zool. London 239:731–740.Google Scholar
  21. Marco, A., Chivers, D. P., Kiesecker, J. M., and Blaustein, A. R. 1998. Mate choice by chemical cues in western redback (Plethodon vehiculum) and Dunn's (P. dunni) salamanders. Ethology 104:781–788.Google Scholar
  22. MartÌn, J. and LÓpez, P. 2000. Chemoreception, symmetry and mate choice in lizards. Proc. R. Soc. London (Ser. B) 267:1265–1269.Google Scholar
  23. Mason, R. T. 1992. Reptilian pheromones, pp. 115–216, in C. Gans and D. Crews (eds.). Biology of the Reptilia, Vol. 18. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Illinois.Google Scholar
  24. Mason, R. T. 1993. Chemical ecology of the red-sided garter snake, Thamnophis sirtalis parietalis. Brain Behav. Evol. 41:261–268.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Mason, R. T. and Crews, D. 1985. Female mimicry in garter snakes. Nature 316:59–60.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Mason, R. T., Fales, H. M., Jones, T. H., Pannell, L. K., Chinn J. W., and Crews, D. 1989. Sex pheromones in snakes. Science 245:290–293.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Mason, R. T., Jones, T. H., Fales, H. M., Pannell, L. K., and Crews, D. 1990. Characterization, synthesis, and behavioral responses to the sex attractiveness pheromone of the red-sided garter snake (Thamnophis sirtalis parietalis). J. Chem. Ecol. 16:2353–2369.Google Scholar
  28. Mason, R. T., Chivers, D. P., Mathis, A., and Blaustein, A. R. 1998. Bioassay methods for amphibians and reptiles, pp. 271–325, in K. F. Haynes and J. G. Millar (eds.). Methods in Chemical Ecology, Vol. 2. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norvell, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
  29. MØller, A. P. 1988. Female choice selects for male sexual tail ornaments in the monogamous swallow. Nature 332:640–642.Google Scholar
  30. Moore, I. T., Lemaster, M. P., and Mason, R. T. 2000. Behavioural and hormonal responses to capture stress in the male red-sided garter snake, Thamnophis sirtalis parietalis. Anim. Behav. 59:529–534.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Noble, G. K. 1937. The sense organs involved in the courtship of Storeria, Thamnophis, and other snakes. Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist. 73:673–725.Google Scholar
  32. Olsson, M. 1993. Male preference for large females and assortative mating for body size in the sand lizard. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 32:337–341.Google Scholar
  33. Reece-Engel, C. 1988. Female choice of resident male rabbits Oryctolagus cuniculus. Anim. Behav. 36:1241–1242.Google Scholar
  34. Ryan, M. J. 1980. Female mate choice in a neotropical frog. Science 209:523–525.Google Scholar
  35. Shine, R., Olsson, M., Moore, I. T., LeMaster, M. P., Greene, M., and Mason, R. T. 1999. Body size enhances mating success in male garter snakes. Anim. Behav. 59:F4–F11.Google Scholar
  36. Shine, R., Olsson, M. M., and Mason, R. T. 2000. Chastity belts in garter snakes: The functional significance of mating plugs. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 70:377–390.Google Scholar
  37. Shine, R., O'Connor, D., Lemaster, M. P., and Mason, R. T. 2001. Pick on someone your own size: Ontogenetic shifts in mate choice by male garter snakes result in size-assortative mating. Anim. Behav. 61:1133–1141.Google Scholar
  38. Sokal, R. R. and Rohlf, F. J. 1995. Biometry. W. H. Freeman, New York.Google Scholar
  39. Sullivan, B. K. 1983. Sexual selection in Woodhouse's toad (Bufo woodhousei). Anim. Behav. 31:1011–1017.Google Scholar
  40. Verrell, P. 1985. Male mate choice for large, fecund females in the red-spotted newt, Notophthalmus viridescens: How is size assessed? Herpetologica 41:382–385.Google Scholar
  41. Whiting, M. J. and Bateman, P.W. 1999. Male preference for large females in the lizard Platysaurus broadleyi. J. Herpetol. 33:309–312.Google Scholar
  42. Zar, J. H. 1984. Biostatistical Analysis, 2nd ed. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of ZoologyOregon State UniversityCorvallis

Personalised recommendations