Journal of Chemical Ecology

, Volume 28, Issue 7, pp 1329–1347

Gut-Based Antioxidant Enzymes in a Polyphagous and a Graminivorous Grasshopper

  • Raymond V. Barbehenn


Graminivorous species of grasshoppers develop lethal lesions in their midgut epithelia when they ingest tannic acid, whereas polyphagous grass- hoppers are unaffected by ingested tannins. This study tests the hypothesis that polyphagous species are defended by higher activities of antioxidant enzymes (constitutive or inducible) in their guts than are graminivorous species. Comparisons were made between four antioxidant enzymes: superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase (CAT), ascorbate peroxidase (APOX), and glutathione transferase peroxidase (GSTPX). Enzyme activities were measured in the gut lumens and midgut tissues of Melanoplus sanguinipes (polyphagous) and Aulocara ellioti (graminivorous). The results of this study do not support the hypothesis that M. sanguinipes is better defended by antioxidant enzymes than is A. ellioti, nor are these enzymes more inducible in M. sanguinipes than in A. ellioti when insects consume food containing 15% dry weight tannic acid. Instead, tannic acid consumption reduced SOD, APOX, and GSTPX activities in both species. This study reports the first evidence that SOD is secreted into the midgut lumen in insects, with activities two- to fourfold higher than those found in midgut tissues. The spatial distribution of GSTPX and APOX activities observed in both species suggests that ingested plant antioxidant enzymes may function as acquired defenses in grasshoppers. In addition, the results of this study permit the first comparison between the antioxidant enzyme defenses of Orthoptera and Lepidoptera. Most notably, grasshoppers have higher SOD activities than caterpillars, but completely lack APOX in their midgut tissues.

Grasshopper Orthoptera Acrididae graminivorous polyphagous herbivore Melanoplus Aulocara antioxidant enzyme superoxide dismutase catalase ascorbate peroxidase glutathione transferase peroxidase 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Aebi, H.1984. Catalase in vitro. Methods Enzymol. 105:121–126.Google Scholar
  2. Ahmad, S. and Pardini, R. S.1990. Antioxidant defense of the cabbage looper, Trichoplusia ni: Enzymatic responses to the superoxide-generating flavonoid, quercetin, and photodynamic furanocoumarin, xanthotoxin. Photochem. Photobiol. 51:305–311.Google Scholar
  3. Ahmad, S., Pritsos, C. A., Bowen, S. M., Kirkland, K. E., Blomquist, G. J., and Pardini, R. S.1987. Activities of enzymes that detoxify superoxide anion and related toxic oxyradicals in Trichoplusia ni. Arch. Insect Biochem. Physiol. 6:85–96.Google Scholar
  4. Appel, H. M. and Joern, A.1998. Gut physicochemistry of grassland grasshoppers. J. Insect Physiol. 44:693–700.Google Scholar
  5. Appel, H. M. and Martin, M. M.. 1990. Gut redox conditions in herbivorous lepidopteran larvae. J. Chem. Ecol.16:3277–3290.Google Scholar
  6. Asada, K.1984. Chloroplasts: Formation of active oxygen and its scavenging. Methods Enzymol.105:422–429.Google Scholar
  7. Aucoin, R. R., Philogene, B. J. R., and Arnason, J. T.1991. Antioxidant enzymes as biochemical defenses against phototoxin-induced oxidative stress in three species of herbivorous Lepidoptera. Arch. Insect. Biochem. Physiol.16:139–152.Google Scholar
  8. Barbehenn, R. V. and Martin, M. M.1994. Tannin sensitivity in Malacosoma disstria: Roles of the peritrophic envelope and midgut oxidation. J. Chem. Ecol. 20:1985–2001.Google Scholar
  9. Barbehenn, R. V., Martin, M. M., and Hagerman, A. E.1996. Reassessment of the roles of the peritrophic envelope and hydrolysis in protecting polyphagous grasshoppers from ingested hydrolyzable tannins. J. Chem. Ecol.22:1901–1919.Google Scholar
  10. Barbehenn, R. V., Bumgarner, S. L., Roosen, E. F., and Martin, M.M.2001. Antioxidant defenses in caterpillars: Role of the ascorbate-recycling system in the midgut lumen. J. Insect Physiol. 47:349–357.Google Scholar
  11. Berenbaum M.R.1991. Comparative processing of allelochemicals in the Papilionidae (Lepidoptera). Arch. Insect Biochem. Physiol.17:213–221.Google Scholar
  12. Bernays, E. A.1978. Tannins: An alternative viewpoint. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 24:244–253.Google Scholar
  13. Bernays, E. A. and Barbehenn, R. V.1987. Nutritional ecology of grass foliage-chewing insects, pp. 147–176, inF. Slansky, Jr., and J. G. Rodriguez (eds.). Nutritional Ecology of Insects, Mites, Spiders, and Related Invertebrates. Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
  14. Bernays, E. A. and Chamberlain, D. J.1980. A study of tolerance of ingested tannin in Schistocerca gregaria. J. Insect Physiol.26:415–420.Google Scholar
  15. Bernays, E. A., Chamberlain, D., and McCarthy, P.1980. The differential effects of ingested tannic acid on different species of Acridoidea. Entomol. Exp. Appl.28:158–166.Google Scholar
  16. Bi, J. L. and Felton G. W.1995. Foliar oxidative stress and insect herbivory: Primary compounds, secondary metabolites, and reactive oxygen species as components of induced resistance. J. Chem. Ecol. 21:1511–1530.Google Scholar
  17. Canada, A. T., Giannella, E., Nguyen, T. D., and Mason, R. P.1990. The production of reactive oxygen species by dietary flavonols. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 9:441–449.Google Scholar
  18. Chapman, R. F.1988. The relationship between diet and the size of the midgut caeca in grasshoppers (Insecta: Orthoptera: Acridoidea). Zool. J. Linn. Soc. 94:319–338.Google Scholar
  19. Dow, J. A. T.1984. Extremely high pH in biological systems: A model for carbonate transport. Am. J. Physiol. 246:R633–R635.Google Scholar
  20. Duffey, S. S. and Felton, G. W.1989. Plant enzymes in resistance to insects, pp. 289–313, inJ. R. Whitaker and P. E. Sonnet (eds.). Biocatalysis in Agricultural Biotechnology. ACS Symposium Series, Vol. 389. American Chemical Society, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  21. Evans, W. A. L. and Payne, D. W.1964. Carbohydrases of the alimentary tract of the desert locust, Schistocerca gregariaForsk. J. Insect Physiol.10:657–674.Google Scholar
  22. Felton, G. W. and Duffey, S. S.1991. Protective role of midgut catalases in lepidopteran larvae against oxidative plant defenses. J. Chem. Ecol. 17:1715–1732.Google Scholar
  23. Felton, G. W. and Duffey, S. S.1992. Ascorbate oxidation reduction in Helicoverpa zeaas a scavenging system against dietary oxidants. Arch. Insect Biochem. Physiol. 19:27–37.Google Scholar
  24. Felton, G. W. Donato, K., Del Veccio, R. J., and Duffey, S. S.1989. Activation of plant foliar oxidases by insect feeding reduces the nutritive quality of foliage for herbivores. J. Chem. Ecol. 15:2667–2694.Google Scholar
  25. Feng, R. and Isman, M. B.1994. Tissue distribution and developmental changes in detoxication enzyme activities in the migratiory grasshopper, Melanoplus sanguinipes(Acrididae). Pestic. Biochem. Physiol.48:48–55.Google Scholar
  26. Ferreira, C., Oliveira, M. C., and Terra, W. R.1990. Compartmentalization of the digestive process in Abracris flavolineatea(Orthoptera: Acrididae) adults. Insect Biochem. 20:267–274.Google Scholar
  27. Gant, T. W., Ramakrishna, R., Mason, R. P., and Cohen, G. M.1988. Redox cycling and sulphydryl arylation; their relative importance in the mechanism of quinone cytotoxicity to isolated hepatocytes. Chem.-Biol. Interactions65:157–173.Google Scholar
  28. Grisham, M.B.1992. Reactive Metabolites of Oxygen and Nitrogen in Biology and Medicine. Landes, Austin, Texas.Google Scholar
  29. Hanham, A. F., Dunn, B. P., and Stich, H. F.1983. Clastogenic activity of caffeic acid and its relationship to hydrogen peroxide generated during autoxidation. Mutat. Res.116:333–339.Google Scholar
  30. Halliwell, B. and Gutteridge, J. M. C.1999. Free Radicals in Biology and Medicine. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  31. Imlay, J. A., Chin, S. M., and Linn, S.1988. Toxic DNA damage by hydrogen peroxide through the Fenton reaction in vivo and in vitro. Science240:640–642.Google Scholar
  32. Isely, F. B.1944. Correlation between mandibular morphology and food specificity in grasshoppers. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 37:47–67.Google Scholar
  33. Isman, M. B., Feng, R., and Johnson, D. L.1996. Detoxicative enzyme activities in five species of field-collected melanopline grasshoppers (Orthoptera: Acrididae). Can. Entomol. 128:353–354.Google Scholar
  34. Lee, K.1991. Glutathione S-transferase activities in phytophagous insects: Induction and inhibition by plant phototoxins and phenols. Insect Biochem.21:353–361.Google Scholar
  35. Lee K. and Berenbaum M.R.1989. Action of antioxidant enzymes and cytochrome P-450 monooxygenases in the cabbage looper in response to plant phototoxins. Arch. Insect Biochem. Physiol.10:151–162.Google Scholar
  36. Lee, K. and Berenbaum, M. R.1990. Defense of parsnip webworm against phototoxic furanocoumarins: Role of antioxidant enzymes. J. Chem. Ecol. 16:2451–2460.Google Scholar
  37. Lindroth, R. L. and Peterson, S. S.1988. Effects of plant phenols on performance of southern armyworm larvae. Oecologia75:185–189.Google Scholar
  38. Maddrell, S. H. P. and Gardiner, B. O. C.1980. The permeability of the cuticular lining of the insect alimentary canal. J. Exp. Biol. 85:227–237.Google Scholar
  39. Martin, M. M.1987. Invertebrate-Microbial Interactions: Ingested Fungal Enzymes in Arthropod Biology. Comstock Publishing Associates, Ithaca, New York.Google Scholar
  40. Mathews, M. C., Summers, C. B., and Felton, G.W.1997. Ascorbate peroxidase:Anovel antioxidant enzyme in insects. Arch. Insect Biochem. Physiol. 34:57–68.Google Scholar
  41. Misra, H. P. and Fridovich, I.1972. The role of superoxide anion in the autoxidation of epinephrine and a simple assay for superoxide dismutase. J. Biol. Chem. 247: 3170–3175.Google Scholar
  42. Munkres, K. D.1990. Purification of exocellular superoxide dismutases. Methods Enzymol. 186:249–259.Google Scholar
  43. Peric-Mataruga, V., Blagojevic, D., Spasic, M. B., Ivanovic, J., and Jankovic-Hladni, M.1997. Effect of the host plant on the antioxidative defence in the midgut of Lymantria disparL. caterpillars of different population origins. J. Insect Physiol. 43:101–106.Google Scholar
  44. Pritsos, C. A., Ahmad, S., Bowen, S. M., Elliot, A. J., Blomquist, G. J., and Pardini, R. S.1988.Antioxidant enzymes of the black swallowtail butterfly, Papilio polyxenes, and their response to the prooxidant allelochemical, quercetin. Arch. Insect Biochem. Physiol. 8:101–112.Google Scholar
  45. Rosen, G. M., Britigan, B. E., Halpern, H. J., and Pou, S.1999. Free Radicals: Biology and Detection by Spin Trapping. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  46. SAS Institute. 2000. The SAS System for Windows, Version 8e. SAS Institute, Cary, North Carolina.Google Scholar
  47. Schultz, J. C. and Lechowicz, M. J.1986. Hostplant, larval age, and feeding behavior influence midgut pH in the gypsy moth (Lymantria dispar). Oecologia71:133–137.Google Scholar
  48. Steinly, B. A. and Berenbaum, M.1985. Histopathological effects of tannins on the midgut epithelium of Papilio polyxenesand Papilio glaucus. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 39:3–9.Google Scholar
  49. Stoscheck, C. M.1990. Increased uniformity in the response of the Coomassie blue G protein assay to different proteins. Anal. Biochem. 184:111–116.Google Scholar
  50. Summers, C. B. and Felton, G.W.1994. Prooxidant effects of phenolic acids on the generalist herbivore Helicoverpa zea(Lepidoptera: Noctuidae): Potential mode of action for phenolic compounds in plant anti-herbivore chemistry. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol.24:943–953.Google Scholar
  51. Thiboldeaux, R. L., Lindroth, R. L., and Tracy, J. W.1998. Effects of juglone (5-hydroxy-1,4-naphthoquinone) on midgut morphology and glutathione status in Saturniid moth larvae. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. 120:481–487.Google Scholar
  52. Weinhold, L. C., Ahmad, S., and Pardini, R. S.1990. Insect glutathione S-transferase: A predictor of allelochemical and oxidative stress. Comp. Biochem. Physiol.95B:355–363.Google Scholar
  53. Zheng, J., Cho, M., Jones, A. D., and Hammock, B. D.1997. Evidence of quinone metabolites of naphthalene covalently bound to sulfur nucleophiles of proteins of murine clara cells after exposure to napthalene. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 10:1008–1014.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Raymond V. Barbehenn
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Department of Molecular, Cellular and Developmental BiologyUniversity of MichiganAnn Arbor

Personalised recommendations