Biodiversity & Conservation

, Volume 11, Issue 8, pp 1437–1450 | Cite as

Conservation of biodiversity in the Arabuko Sokoke Forest, Kenya

  • Samuel Muriithi
  • Wendy Kenyon

Abstract

Using an economic approach to provide a rationale for rainforestconservation has been a popular exercise in recent years. This paper uses suchan approach to assess the net value of the Arabuko Sokoke Forest in Kenya. Theeconomic benefits associated with the forest derived by local and globalpopulations are estimated by combining evidence from existing studies and theresults of a contingent valuation study carried out by the authors. Thesebenefits are set against the cost of preserving the forest to the Kenyan ForestDepartment. Even when the opportunity cost of the forest land is omitted fromthe costs of forest preservation, and when the revenues generated from theGlobal Environment Facility (GEF) funded project are included, the costs offorest conservation outweigh the benefits. It is only when non-use andexistencevalues are included (which are not realised by the Kenyan population) that theforest benefits exceed the costs. The paper concludes by arguing that, althoughsome projects within the Arabuko Sokoke Forest have been successful incapturingsome of the economic value associated with the forest, more needs to be done todesign additional capture mechanisms so that a greater proportion of the globalbenefit of the forest can be realised by local populations and localgovernments.

Biodiversity Contingent valuation Forests Global benefits 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abelson P. 1996. Project Appraisal and Valuation of the Environment. General Principles and Six Case-Studies in Developing Countries. Macmillan Press Ltd, Basingstoke, UK.Google Scholar
  2. Alfarez-Farizo B., Hanley N., Wright R.E. and Macmillan D.C. 1999. Estimating the benefits of agri-environment policy — econometric issues in open-ended contingent valuation studies. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 42: 23–43.Google Scholar
  3. Arabuko Sokoke Forest Annual Report (1999) Kenyan Forest Department, Nairobi, Kenya.Google Scholar
  4. Arrow K., Solow R., Portney P.R., Leamer E.E., Radner R. and Schuman H. 1993. Report of the NOAA panel on contingent valuation. Federal Register 58: 4601–4614.Google Scholar
  5. AyiembaW.O. 1998. Biodiversity Utilisation by the Local Communities. Impact of Butterfly Farming on Wild Population of Butterfly to Forest Conservation. National Museums of Kenya, Nairobi, Kenya.Google Scholar
  6. Bann C. 2000. A Contingent Valuation of the Mangroves of Benut. Paper presented at the European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists Conference, Crete. Johor State, Malaysia (unpublished).Google Scholar
  7. Boyle K.J., Johnson F.R., McCollum D.W., Desvouges W.H., Dunford R.W. and Hudson S.P. 1996. Valuing public goods: discrete versus continuous valuation responses. Land Economics 72: 381–396.Google Scholar
  8. Carson R. 1994. A Bibliography of Contingent Valuation Studies and Papers. University of California, San Diego, California, pp. 1–104.Google Scholar
  9. Dixon J.A. and Sherman P.B. 1991. Economics of Protected Areas. A New Look at Benefits and Costs. Earthscan Publications, London.Google Scholar
  10. Edwards-Jones G. and KenyonW. 1998. What level of information enables the public to act like experts when evaluating ecological goods. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 41: 463–475.Google Scholar
  11. Emerton L. 1994. Summary of the Current Value Use of Arabuko Sokoke. Forest Department, Nairobi, Kenya.Google Scholar
  12. Fitz-Gibbon C.D., Mogaka H. and Fanshawe J.H. 1995. Subsistence hunting in Arabuko Sokoke Forest and its effect on mammal population. Conservation Biology 9: 1116–1126.Google Scholar
  13. Hanley N. and Ruffell R.J. 1993. The contingent valuation of forest characteristics: two experiments. Journal of Agricultural Economics 44: 217–229.Google Scholar
  14. International Institute of Environment and Development 1997. Valuing the Hidden Harvest: Methodological Approaches for Local-level Economic Analysis of Wild Resources. IIED, London.Google Scholar
  15. Kamuaro O. 1998. State and community conflicts in natural resource management in Kenya. In: Veit P. (ed.), Africa's Valuable Assets. A Reader in Natural Resource Management. World Resources Institute, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  16. Kramer R.A. and Mercer D.E. 1997. Valuing a global environmental good: US residents' willingness to pay to protect tropical rain-forest. Land Economics 73: 196–210.Google Scholar
  17. Kingdon J. 1997. The Kingdon Field Guide to African Mammals. Academic Press, San Diego, California.Google Scholar
  18. KIFCON 1991. Arabuko Sokoke Forest Ornithological Survey. Forest Department, Nairobi, Kenya.Google Scholar
  19. KIFCON 1992. Arabuko Sokoke Forest Vegetation Survey. Forest Department, Nairobi, Kenya.Google Scholar
  20. KIFCON 1993. Arabuko Sokoke Forest Mammal Survey. Forest Department, Nairobi, Kenya.Google Scholar
  21. KIFCON 1995. Arabuko Sokoke Forest and Mida Creek, The Official Guide. Forest Department, Nairobi, Kenya.Google Scholar
  22. Mitchell R.C. and Carson R.T. 1989. Using Surveys to Value Public Goods: The Contingent Valuation Method. Resources for the Future, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  23. Negussie G. 1997. Use of traditional values in search for conservation goals: the Kaya forests of the Kenyan coast. In: Doolan S. (ed.), African Rainforest and the Conservation of Biodiversity. Proceedings of the Limbe Conference, 17–24 January 1997, Limbe Botanic Garden, Cameroon. Earthwatch Europe, Oxford.Google Scholar
  24. Norton-Griffith M. 1995. The opportunity cost of biodiversity conservation in Kenya. Ecological Economics 12: 125–139.Google Scholar
  25. Pearce D.W. 1991. An economic approach to saving the tropical forests. In: Helm D. (ed.), Economic Policy Towards the Environment. Blackwell, Oxford, pp. 239–262.Google Scholar
  26. Pearce D.W. and Moran D. 1994. The Economic Value of Biodiversity. Earthscan, London.Google Scholar
  27. Pearce D., Georgiou W.S. and Moran D. 1994. Economic Values and the Environment in Developing Countries. A Report to the United Nations Environmental Programme. UNEP, Nairobi, Kenya.Google Scholar
  28. Ready R., Buzby J.C. and Hu D. 1996. Difference between continuous and discrete contingent valuation estimates. Land Economics 72: 397–411.Google Scholar
  29. Republic of Kenya 1968. Sessional Paper No. 1 of 1968, A Forest Policy for Kenya. Government Printer, Nairobi, Kenya.Google Scholar
  30. Republic of Kenya 1997. National Development Plan 1997–2001. Government Printer, Nairobi, Kenya.Google Scholar
  31. Wass P. 1995. Kenya Indigenous Forests, Status, Management and Conservation. The World Conservation Union, Gland, Switzerland.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Samuel Muriithi
    • 1
  • Wendy Kenyon
    • 2
  1. 1.Forest DepartmentNairobiKenya
  2. 2.Scottish Agricultural CollegeEdinburghUK

Personalised recommendations