Advertisement

Computers and the Humanities

, Volume 36, Issue 3, pp 283–293 | Cite as

Computer-mediated Texts and Textuality: Theory and Practice

  • Susan Schreibman
Article

Abstract

The majority of humanities computingprojects within the discipline of literaturehave been conceived more as digital librariesthan monographs which utilise the medium as asite of interpretation. The impetus to conceiveelectronic research in this way comes from theunderlying philosophy of texts and textualityimplicit in SGML and its instantiation for thehumanities, the TEI, which was conceived as ``amarkup system intended for representing alreadyexisting literary texts''. This article exploresthe most common theories used to conceiveelectronic research in literature, such ashypertext theory, OCHO (Ordered Hierarchy ofContent Objects), and Jerome J. McGann's``noninformational'' forms of textuality. It alsoargues that as our understanding of electronictexts and textuality deepens, and as advancesin technology progresses, other theories, suchas Reception Theory and Versioning, may well beadapted to serve as a theoretical basis forconceiving research more akin to an electronicmonograph than a digital library.

electronic texts literary criticism reception theory versioning 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. DeRose S., Durand D., Mylonas E. (1990) What is Text, Really? Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 1/2 (Winter).Google Scholar
  2. DeRose S.J., Durand D., Mylonas E., Renear A. (1997) Author's Response to Three Comments on 'What is Text, Really?' Journal of Computer Documentation.Google Scholar
  3. Guidelines for Electronic Text Encoding and Interchange (TEIP3) (1997) In Sperberg-McQueen C.M., Burnard L. (eds.). Text Encoding Initiative, Chicago.Google Scholar
  4. Hockey S., Renear A., McGann J.J. What is Text? A Debate on the Philosophical and Epistemological Nature of Text in the Light of Humanities Computing Research. [http://www.humanities. ualberta.ca/Susan_Hockey/achallc99.htm]Google Scholar
  5. Holub R. (1995) Reception Theory: School of Constance. In Selden R. (ed.), The Cambridge History of Literary Criticism: From Formalism to Poststructuralism. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 319–346.Google Scholar
  6. Horton W. (1994) Designing and Writing Online Documentation, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
  7. Landow G.P. (1997) Hypertext 2.0: The Convergence of Contemporary Critical Theory and Technology. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.Google Scholar
  8. Machan T.W. (1995) Chaucer's Poetry, Versioning and Hypertext. Philological Quarterly, 1/73, pp. 299–316.Google Scholar
  9. McGann J. Rethinking Textuality. [http://jefferson.village.virginia.edu/jjm2f/jj2000aweb.html]Google Scholar
  10. Renear A., Mylonas E., Durand D. (1993) Refining Our Notion of What Text Really Is: The Problem of Overlapping Hierarchies. [http://www.stg.brown.edu/resources/stg/monographs/ohco.html]Google Scholar
  11. Renear A. (1997) Theory and Meta-Theory in the Development of Text Encoding. Target paper for The Monist, in circulation in 1996 in the Interactive Monist Seminar. Summary published in The Monist, 80: 3 July. [http://hhobel.phl.univie.ac.at/mii/pesp.html]Google Scholar
  12. Renear A. (1997) Out of Praxis: Three (Meta)Theories of Textuality. In Sutherland K. (ed.), Electronic Textuality: Investigations in Method and Theory, Oxford University Press, pp. 109–126.Google Scholar
  13. Reiman D.H. (1987) Romantic Texts and Contexts. University of Missouri Press, Columbia.Google Scholar
  14. Robinson P.M.W. (1996) Is There a Text in These Variants? The Literary Text in the Digital Age. In Richard R.J. (ed.), The University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
  15. Shillingsburg P. (1996) Scholarly Editing in the Computer Age: Theory and Practice, 3rd edn. The University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
  16. Sutherland K. (1997) Introduction. In Sutherland K. (ed.), Electronic Textuality: Investigations in Method and Theory, Oxford University Press, pp. 1–18.Google Scholar
  17. Zeller H. (1975) A New Approach to the Critical Constitution of Literary Texts. Studies in Bibliography, 28, pp. 231–264.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Susan Schreibman
    • 1
  1. 1.University of Maryland, MITH, Mckeldin LibraryCollege ParkUSA

Personalised recommendations