Educational Studies in Mathematics

, Volume 48, Issue 2–3, pp 239–257

Young Peoples' Ideas of Infinity

  • John Monaghan


This paper considers views of infinity of young people prior to instruction in the methods mathematicians use in dealing with infinity. To avoid overlap with other papers in this special issue on infinity, reference to limit notions and Cantorian views of infinity are kept to the minimum. A partially historical account of studies examining young peoples' ideas of infinity is presented. Methodological problems in accessing such ideas is a sub-theme of this paper. The four main sections deal with: potential pitfalls for research in this area and the work of Piaget; issues concerning the contradictory nature of infinity and infinity as a process and as a object; infinite numbers; contexts and tasks.

infinity pre-university research methods 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Cornu, B.: 1983, L'apprentissage de la Notion de Limites: Conceptions et Obstacles, Unpublished PhD thesis, L'Universite Scientifique et Medicale de Grenoble.Google Scholar
  2. Cornu, B.: 1991, ‘Limits’, in D. Tall (ed.), Advanced Mathematical Thinking, Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, pp. 153–166.Google Scholar
  3. Darke, I.: 1982, ‘A review of research related to the topological primacy thesis’, Educational Studies in Mathematics 13, 119–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Dubinsky, E.: 1991, ‘Reflective abstraction in advanced mathematical thinking, in D. Tall (ed.), Advanced Mathematical Thinking, Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp. 95–123.Google Scholar
  5. Fischbein, E., Tirosh, D. and Hess, P.: 1979, ‘The intuition of infinity’, Educational Studies in Mathematics 10, 3–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Fischbein, E., Jehiam, R. and Cohen, D.: 1995, ‘The concept of rational numbers in high school students and prospective teachers’, Educational Studies in Mathematics 29, 29–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Falk, R.: 1992, Infinity: A Cognitive Challenge, Preprint available from the author, Department of Psychology, The Hebrew University, Jerusalem.Google Scholar
  8. Falk, R., Gassner, D., Ben Zoor, F. and Ben Simon, K.: 1986, ‘How do children cope with the infinity of numbers?’, in Proceedings of the 10th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, London, pp. 13–18.Google Scholar
  9. Gray, E. and Tall, D.: 1994, ‘Duality, ambiguity, and flexibility: A “proceptual” view of simple arithmetic’, Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 25(2), 116–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gilhooly, K. and Green, C.: 1986, ‘Protocol analysis: theoretical background, in J. Richardson (ed.), Handbook of Qualitative Research for Psychological and Social Sciences, British Psychological Society, pp. 43–54.Google Scholar
  11. Henle, J. and Kleinberg, M.: 1979, Infinitesimal Calculus, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
  12. Lakatos, I.: 1978, ‘Cauchy and the continuum: The significance of non-standard analysis for the history and philosophy of mathematics’, Mathematical Intelligencer 1(3), 151–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Lave, J.: 1988, Cognition in Practice, CUP: Cambridge.Google Scholar
  14. Monaghan, J.: 1986, Adolescents’ Understanding of Limits and Infinity, Unpublished PhD thesis, Mathematics Education Research Centre, University of Warwick, UK.Google Scholar
  15. Moreno, L. and Waldegg, G.: 1991, ‘The conceptual evolution of actual mathematical infinity’, Educational Studies in Mathematics 22, 211–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Nú ñ ez, R.: 1994, ‘Subdivision and small infinities: Zeno, paradoxes and cognition’, in Vol. 3 of the Proceedings of the 18th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, Lisbon, pp. 368–375.Google Scholar
  17. Piaget, J.: 1952, The Child's Conception of Number, Norton, New York, (originally published in 1941).Google Scholar
  18. Piaget, J. and Inhelder, B.: 1956, The Child's Conception of Space, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London (originally published in 1948).Google Scholar
  19. Piaget, J. and Inhelder, B.: 1969, The Psychology of the Child, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London, (originally published in 1966).Google Scholar
  20. Robinson, A.: 1966, Non-standard Analysis, North Holland, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  21. Sacristán Rock, A.: 1997, Windows on the Infinite: Constructing Meanings in a Logo-based Microworld, Unpublished PhD thesis, Institute of Education, University of London, UK.Google Scholar
  22. Sacristán Rock, A.: 2001, ‘Students shifting conceptions of the infinite through computer explorations of fractals and other visual models’, in Vol. 4 of the Proceedings of the 25th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, The Freudenthal Institute, Utrecht, pp. 129–136.Google Scholar
  23. Sfard, A.: 1991, ‘On the dual nature of mathematical conceptions: Reflections on processes and objects as different sides of the same coin’, Educational Studies in Mathematics 22, 1–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Skemp, R.: 1979, The Psychology of Learning Mathematics, Penguin Books, Harmondsworth.Google Scholar
  25. Taback, S.: 1975, ‘The child's concept of limit’, in M. Rosskopf (ed.), Children's Mathematical Concepts, Teachers College Press, New York, pp. 111–144.Google Scholar
  26. Tall, D.: 1980, ‘The notion of infinite measuring number and its relevance in the intuition of infinity’, Educational Studies in Mathematics 11, 271–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Vinner, S. and Kidron, I.: 1985, ‘The concept of repeating and non-repeating decimals at the senior high level’, in the Proceedings of the 9th International Conference for the Psychology of Mathematics Education. Noordwijkerhout, The Netherlands, pp. 357–361.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • John Monaghan
    • 1
  1. 1.University of Leeds, Centre for Studies in Science and Mathematics EducationUniversity of LeedsLeedsUK

Personalised recommendations