Pharmaceutical Research

, Volume 13, Issue 3, pp 376–380 | Cite as

Structure and Behavior in Hydrophilic Matrix Sustained Release Dosage Forms: 4. Studies of Water Mobility and Diffusion Coefficients in the Gel Layer of HPMC Tablets Using NMR Imaging

  • Ali R. Rajabi-Siahboomi
  • Richard W. Bowtell
  • Peter Mansfield
  • Martyn C. Davies
  • Colin D. Melia

Abstract

Purpose. The purpose of this study was to characterise the water mobility in the gel layer of hydrating HPMC tablets. Water mobility in the gel layer of different HPMCs was studied.

Methods. NMR imaging, a non-invasive technique, has been used to measure the spatial distribution of self-diffusion coefficient (SDC) and T2 relaxation times across the gel layer.

Results. It has been shown that there is a water mobility gradient across the gel layer of HPMC tablets. Although SDC and T2 relaxation times in the outer parts of the gel layer approached that of free water, in the inner parts they decreased progressively. Water mobility and SDC in the gel layer of different HPMCs appeared to vary with degree of substitution of the polymer and the lowest values were obtained across the gel layer of K4M tablets.

Conclusions. Water mobility varies across the gel layer of hydrating HPMC tablets and it is dependent on the degree of substitution of the polymer.

hydrophilic matrix self-diffusion coefficient water mobility T2 relaxation NMR-imaging NMR-microscopy hydroxypropylmethylcellulose (HPMC) 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.
    C. D. Melia, Hydrophilic matrix sustained release systems based on polysaccharides carriers. Crit. Rev. Ther. Drug Carrier Systems 8:395–421 (1991).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    C. D. Melia, A. C. Hodsdon, M. C. Davies, J. R. Mitchell, Polymer concentration profiles of the surface gel layer of xanthan, alginate and HPMC matrix systems. Proceed. Intern. Symp. Control. Rel. Bioact. Mater. 21:724–725 (1994).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    C. D. Melia, J. S. Binns, M. C. Davies, Polymer hydration and drug distribution within the gel layer of hydrophilic matrix devices during drug release. J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 42:125P (1990).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    A. C. Hodsdon, J. R. Mitchell, M. C. Davies, C. D. Melia, Structure and behaviour in hydrophilic matrix sustained release dosage forms: 3. The influence of pH on the sustained-release performance and internal gel structure of sodium alginate matrices. J. Controlled Release 33:143–152 (1995).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    C. D. Melia, A. R. Rajabi-Siahboomi, A. C. Hodsdon, J. Adler and J. R. Mitchell, Structure and behaviour in hydrophilic matrix sustained release dosage forms: 1. The origin and mechanism of formation of gas bubbles in the hydrated surface layer. Int. J. Pharm. 100:263–269 (1994).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    R. W. Korsmeyer, E. D. Von Meerwall and N. A. Peppas, Diffusion in swellable drug delivery systems. Proceed. Intern. Symp. Control. Rel. Bioact. Mater. 12:81–82 (1985).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    A. R. Rajabi-Siahboomi, R. W. Bowtell, P. Mansfield, A. Henderson, M. C. Davies and C. D. Melia, Structure and behaviour in hydrophilic matrix sustained release dosage forms: 2. NMR-imaging studies of dimensional changes in the gel layer and core of HPMC matrices undergoing hydration. J. Controlled Release 31:121–128 (1994).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    R. W. Bowtell, J. C. Sharp, A. Peters, P. Mansfield, A. R. Rajabi-Siahboomi, M. C. Davies and C. D. Melia, NMR Microscopy of hydrating hydrophilic matrix pharmaceutical tablets. Mag. Res., Imaging 12:361–364 (1994).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    R. A. Meyer and T. R. Brown, Diffusion measurements by microscopic NMR imaging. J. Mag. Res. 76:393–399 (1988).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    L. A. Weisenberger and J. L Koenig, NMR imaging of diffusion processes in polymers: Measurement of spatial dependence of solvent mobility in partially swollen PMMA rods. Macromolecules 23:2445–2453 (1990).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    D. Hariharan, N. A. Peppas, Modelling of water transport and solute release in physiologically sensitive gels. J. Controlled Release 23:123–136 (1993).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    A. R. Rajabi-Siahboomi, M. C. Davies and C. D. Melia, Probing the hydration of the surface gel layer in HPMC hydrophilic matrices. In “Proceedings 1st UKaps Conf.” 1992 Eds Hadgraft J., Kellaway I. W., Parr G. D. STS Publishing, Cardiff, UK pp 34.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    D. A. Alderman, A review of cellulose ethers in hydrophilic matrices for oral controlled release dosage forms. Int. J. Pharm. Tech. Prod. Mft. 5:1–9 (1984).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    P. Colombo, P. L Catellani, N. A. Peppas, L. Maggi and U. Conte, Swelling characteristics of hydrophilic matrices for controlled release: New dimensionless number to describe the swelling and release behaviour. Int. J. Pharm. 88:99–109 (1992).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    K. Mitchell, J. Ford, C. Rostron, D. Armstrong, P. Elliott and J. Hogan, Swelling behaviour of cellulose ether matrix tablets. J. Pharm. Pharmacol. Suppl. 43:77P (1991).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ali R. Rajabi-Siahboomi
    • 1
  • Richard W. Bowtell
    • 1
  • Peter Mansfield
    • 1
  • Martyn C. Davies
    • 1
  • Colin D. Melia
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Physics and Department of Pharmaceutical SciencesNottingham UniversityNottinghamUnited Kingdom
  2. 2.School of PharmacyLiverpool John Moores UniversityLiverpoolUnited Kingdom

Personalised recommendations