Evolutionary Ecology

, Volume 16, Issue 1, pp 27–47

Phenotypic plasticity to light intensity in Arabidopsis thaliana: invariance of reaction norms and phenotypic integration

Article

Abstract

Phenotypic plasticity (the pattern of response of organisms to changes in environmental conditions) and phenotypic integration (the pattern of character correlations) are important components of our understanding of the evolution of complex phenotypes. Most studies published so far in this area have been conducted within populations with the express aim of predicting future response to evolutionary forces. However, among-population differentiation for plasticity and trait correlations are important indicators of recent past events that have shaped the currently observable phenotypes. We investigated variation in the reaction norms of several traits in a large number of accessions of Arabidopsis thaliana exposed to different levels of light quantity as well as the environmental lability of the corresponding across-population character variance–covariance matrix. Our results show that there is an astounding degree of inter-population variation for character means and very little variation for plasticity, in agreement with the idea that A. thaliana is a light-specialist often occurring in open, disturbed habitats. However, this plant also shows patterns of plasticity that are predicted to be adaptive based on functional ecological considerations, such as an increase in either specific leaf area or leaf number (but not both) under low light. We also demonstrate that the set of character correlations in A. thaliana is extremely stable to changes in light availability, contrary to previous findings in the same species when different environmental factors were considered. Several processes that might have been responsible for the observed patterns are discussed as a prelude to follow-up research on these problems.

Arabidopsis character covariances light quantity phenotypic plasticity 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aastveit, A.H. and Aastveit, K. (1993) Effects of genotype-environment interactions on genetic correlations. Theor. Appl. Genet. 86, 1007–1013.Google Scholar
  2. Ackerly, D.D. and Donoghue, M.J. (1998) Leaf size, sapling allometry, and Corner's rules: phylogeny and correlated evolution in maples (Acer). The Am. Nat. 152, 767–791.Google Scholar
  3. Alonso-Blanco, C., El-Assal, S.E.-D., Coupland, G. and Koornneef, M. (1998) Analysis of natural allelic variation at flowering time loci in the Landsberg erecta and Cape Verde Islands ecotypes of Arabidopsis thaliana. Genetics 149, 749–764.Google Scholar
  4. Anderson, M. and Roberts, J.A. (1998) Arabidopsis. Sheffield Academic Press, Sheffield, England.Google Scholar
  5. Andersson, S. and Shaw, R.G. (1994) Phenotypic plasticity in Crepis tectorum (Asteraceae): genetic correlations across light regimens. Heredity 72, 113–125.Google Scholar
  6. Armbruster, W.S. and Schwaegerle, K.E. (1996) Causes of covariation of phenotypic traits among populations. J. Evol. Biol. 9, 261–277.Google Scholar
  7. Ballare, C.L. (1999) Keeping up with the neighbours: phytochrome sensing and other signalling mechanisms. Trends Plant Sci. 4, 97–102.Google Scholar
  8. Barton, N. and Partridge, L. (2000) Limits to natural selection. BioEssays 22, 1075–1084.Google Scholar
  9. Bell, G. (1992) The ecology and genetics of fitness in Clamydomonas. V. The relationship between genetic correlation and environmental variance. Evolution 46, 561–565.Google Scholar
  10. Bell, G. and Reboud, X. (1997) Experimental evolution in Chlamydomonas II. Genetic variation in strongly contrasted environments. Heredity 78, 498–506.Google Scholar
  11. Bradshaw, A.D. (1972) Some of the evolutionary consequences of being a plant. Evol. Biol. 6, 25–47.Google Scholar
  12. Byers, D.L. and Quinn, J.A. (1998) Demographic variation in Alliaria petiolata (Brassicaceae) in four contrasting habitats. J. Torrey Bot. Soc. 125, 138–149.Google Scholar
  13. Callahan, H. and Pigliucci, M. (in press) Shade-induced plasticity and its ecological significance in wild populations of Arabidopsis thaliana. Ecology.Google Scholar
  14. Callahan, H.S., Wells, C.L. and Pigliucci, M. (1999) Light-sensitive plasticity genes in Arabidopsis thaliana: mutant analysis and ecological genetics. Evol. Ecol. Res. 1, 731–751.Google Scholar
  15. Camara, M. and Pigliucci, M. (1999) Mutational contributions to genetic variance/covariance matrices: an experimental approach using induced mutations in Arabidopsis thaliana. Evolution 53, 1692–1703.Google Scholar
  16. Camara, M.D., Ancell, C.A. and Pigliucci, M. (2000) Induced mutations: a novel tool to study phenotypic integration and evolutionary constraints in Arabidopsis thaliana. Evolutionary Ecol. Res. 2, 1009–1029.Google Scholar
  17. Cheverud, J.M. (1984) Quantitative genetics and developmental constraints on evolution by selection. J. Theor. Biol. 110, 155–171.Google Scholar
  18. Dorn, L.A., Pyle, E.H. and Schmitt, J. (2000) Plasticity to light cues and resources in Arabidopsis thaliana: testing for adaptive value and costs. Evolution 54, 1982–1994.Google Scholar
  19. Dudley, S.A. and Schmitt, J. (1996) Testing the adaptive plasticity hypothesis: density-dependent selection on manipulated stem length in Impatiens capensis. The Am. Nat. 147, 445–465.Google Scholar
  20. Eisen, E.J. and Saxton, A.M. (1983) Genotype by environment interactions and genetic correlations involving two environmental factors. Theor. Appl. Genet. 67, 75–86.Google Scholar
  21. Galen, C. (2000) High and dry: drought stress, sex-allocation trade-offs, and selection on flower size in the alpine wildflower Polemonium viscosum (Polemoniaceae). The Am. Nat. 156, 72–83.Google Scholar
  22. Gould, S.J. (1966) Allometry and size in ontogeny and phylogeny. Biol. Rev. 41, 587–640.Google Scholar
  23. Hansen, T.F. and Martins, E.P. (1996) Translating between microevolutionary process and macroevolutionary patterns: the correlation structure of interspecific data. Evolution 50, 1404–1417.Google Scholar
  24. Klingenberg, C.P., Badyaev, A.V., Sowry, S.M. and Beckwith, N.J. (2001) Inferring developmental modularity from morphological integration: analysis of individual variation and asymmetry in bumblebee wings. The Am. Nat. 157, 11–23.Google Scholar
  25. Klingenberg, C.P. and Zimmermann, M. (1992) Static, ontogenetic, and evolutionary allometry: a multivariate comparison in nine species of water striders. The Am. Nat. 140, 601–620.Google Scholar
  26. Kunkel, B.N. (1996) A useful weed put to work: genetic analysis of disease resistance in Arabidopsis thaliana. Trends Genet 12, 63–69.Google Scholar
  27. Lande, R. (1979) Quantitative genetic analysis of multivariate evolution, applied to brain:body size allometry. Evolution 33, 402–416.Google Scholar
  28. Lande, R. and Arnold, S.J. (1983) The measurement of selection on correlated characters. Evolution 37, 1210–1226.Google Scholar
  29. Lasceve, G., Leymarie, J., Olney, M.A., Liscum, E., Christie, J.M., Vavasseur, A. and Briggs, W.R. (1999) Arabidopsis contains at least four independent blue-light-activated signal transduction pathways. Plant Physiol. 120, 605–614.Google Scholar
  30. Merila, J. and Bjorklund, M. (1999) Population divergence and morphometric integration in the Greenfinch (Carduelis chloris) - evolution against the trajectory of least resistance? J. Evol. Biol. 12, 103–112.Google Scholar
  31. Mezey, J.G., Cheverud, J.M. and Wagner, G.P. (2000) Is the genotype-phenotype map modular? A statistical approach using mouse Quantitative Trait Loci data. Genetics 156, 305–311.Google Scholar
  32. Mitchell-Olds, T. (1996a) Genetic constraints on life-history evolution: quantitative-trait loci influencing growth and flowering in Arabidopsis thaliana. Evolution 50, 140–145.Google Scholar
  33. Mitchell-Olds, T. (1996b) Pleiotropy causes long-term genetic constraints on life-history evolution in Brassica rapa. Evolution 50, 1849–1858.Google Scholar
  34. Newman, R.A. (1994) Genetic variation for phenotypic plasticity in the larval life history of spadefoot toads (Scaphiopus couchii). Evolution 48, 1773–1785.Google Scholar
  35. Nooden, L.D., Hillsberg, J.W. and Schneider, M.J. (1996) Induction of leaf senescence in Arabidopsis thaliana by long days through a light-dosage effect. Physiol. Plantarum 96, 491–495.Google Scholar
  36. Nunez-Olivera, E., Martinez-Abaigar, J. and Escudero, J.C. (1996) Adaptability of leaves of Cistus ladanifer to widely varying environmental conditions. Funct. Ecol. 10, 636–646.Google Scholar
  37. Petrov, A.P. and Petrosov, V.A. (1981) Variability in some lines of Arabidopsis thaliana (L.) Heynh. under different lighting conditions. Genetika 16, 1596–1602.Google Scholar
  38. Phillips, P.C. and Arnold, S.J. (1999) Hierarchical comparison of genetic variance-covariance matrices. I. Using the Flury hierarchy. Evolution 53, 1506–1515.Google Scholar
  39. Pigliucci, M. (1998) Ecological and evolutionary genetics of Arabidopsis. Trends Plant Sci. 3, 485–489.Google Scholar
  40. Pigliucci, M. (in press) Touchy and bushy: phenotypic plasticity and integration in response to wind stimulation in Arabidopsis thaliana. Int. J. Plant Sci. Google Scholar
  41. Pigliucci, M. and Kaplan, J. (2000) The fall and rise of Dr Pangloss: adaptationism and the Spandrels paper 20 years later. Trends Ecol. Evol. 15, 66–70.Google Scholar
  42. Pigliucci, M. and Schlichting, C.D. (1995) Reaction norms of Arabidopsis (Brassicaceae). III. Response to nutrients in 26 populations from a worldwide collection. Am. J. Bot. 82, 1117–1125.Google Scholar
  43. Pigliucci, M. and Schlichting, C.D. (1996) Reaction norms of Arabidopsis. IV. Relationships between plasticity and fitness. Heredity 76, 427–436.Google Scholar
  44. Pigliucci, M. and Schlichting, C.D. (1998) Reaction norms of Arabidopsis. V. Flowering time controls phenotypic architecture in response to nutrient stress. J. Evol. Biol. 11, 285–301.Google Scholar
  45. Pigliucci, M., Schlichting, C.D., Jones, C.S. and Schwenk, K. (1996) Developmental reaction norms: the interactions among allometry, ontogeny and plasticity. Plant Species Biol. 11, 69–85.Google Scholar
  46. Pigliucci, M., Whitton, J. and Schlichting, C.D. (1995) Reaction norms of Arabidopsis. I. Plasticity of characters and correlations across water, nutrient and light gradients. J. Evol. Biol. 8, 421–438.Google Scholar
  47. Rice, W.R. (1989) Analyzing tables of statistical tests. Evolution 43, 223–225.Google Scholar
  48. Riska, B. (1991) Regression models in evolutionary allometry. The Am. Nat. 138, 283–299.Google Scholar
  49. Roff, D. (2000) The evolution of the G matrix: selection or drift? Heredity 84, 135–142.Google Scholar
  50. Scheiner, S.M. (1993) Genetics and evolution of phenotypic plasticity. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Systematics 24, 35–68.Google Scholar
  51. Schlichting, C.D. (1989) Phenotypic integration and environmental change. BioScience 39, 460–464.Google Scholar
  52. Schlichting, C.D. and Levin, D.A. (1986) Phenotypic plasticity: an evolving plant character. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 29, 37–47.Google Scholar
  53. Schlichting, C.D. and Pigliucci, M. (1993) Evolution of phenotypic plasticity via regulatory genes. The Am. Nat. 142, 366–370.Google Scholar
  54. Schlichting, C.D. and Pigliucci, M. (1998) Phenotypic Evolution, a Reaction Norm Perspective. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA.Google Scholar
  55. Schmalhausen, I.I. (1949) Factors of Evolution. The Theory of Stabilizing Selection. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
  56. Schmitt, J., Dudley, S. and Pigliucci, M. (1999) Manipulative approaches to testing adaptive plasticity: phytochrome-mediated shade avoidance responses in plants. The Am. Nat. 154, S43–S54.Google Scholar
  57. Service, P.M. and Rose, M.R. (1985) Genetic covariation among life-history components: the effect of novel environments. Evolution 39, 943–945.Google Scholar
  58. Shaw, F.H., Shaw, R.G., Wilkinson, G.S. and Turelli, M. (1995) Changes in genetic variances and covariances: G whiz! Evolution 49, 1260–1267.Google Scholar
  59. Shirley, M.D.F. and Sibly, R.M. (1999) Genetic basis of a between-environment trade-off involving resistance to cadmium in Drosophila melanogaster. Evolution 53, 826–836.Google Scholar
  60. Sills, G.R. and Nienhuis, J. (1995) Maternal phenotypic effects due to soil nutrient levels and sink removal in Arabidopsis thaliana (Brassicaceae). Am. J. Bot. 82, 491–495.Google Scholar
  61. Simons, A.M. and Roff, D.A. (1996) The effect of a variable environment on the genetic correlation structure in a field cricket. Evolution 50, 267–275.Google Scholar
  62. Sokal, R.R. and Rohlf, F.J. (1995) Biometry. Freeman & Co., New York, NY.Google Scholar
  63. Steppan, S.J. (1997) Phylogenetic analysis of phenotypic covariance structure. I. Contrasting results from matrix correlation and common principal component analyses. Evolution 51, 571–586.Google Scholar
  64. Stratton, D.A. and Bennington, C.C. (1996) Measuring spatial variation in natural selection using randomly-sown seeds of Arabidopsis thaliana. J. Evol. Biol. 9, 215–228.Google Scholar
  65. Sultan, S.E. (1995) Phenotypic plasticity and plant adaptation. Acta Bot. Neederl. 44, 363–383.Google Scholar
  66. SYSTAT. 2000. SYSTAT 10.0 for Windows. SPSS Inc., Chicago.Google Scholar
  67. Tatar, M. and Carey, J.R. (1995) Nutrition mediates reproductivity trade-offs with age-specific mortality in the beetle Callosobruchus maculatus. Ecology 76, 2066–2073.Google Scholar
  68. Travisano, M., Mongold, J.A., Bennett, A.F. and Lenski, R.E. (1995) Experimental tests of the roles of adaptation, chance, and history in evolution. Science 267, 87–90.Google Scholar
  69. Turelli, M. (1988) Phenotypic evolution, constant covariances, and the maintenance of additive variance. Evolution 42, 1342–1347.Google Scholar
  70. Via, S. (1987) Genetic constraints on the evolution of phenotypic plasticity. In V. Loeschcke (ed) Genetic Constraints on Adaptive Evolution. Springer-Verlag, Berlin. pp. 47–71.Google Scholar
  71. Via, S. (1993) Adaptive phenotypic plasticity: target or by-product of selection in a variable environment? The Am. Nat. 142, 352–365.Google Scholar
  72. Wagner, G.P. (1995) Adaptation and the modular design of organisms. In F. Moran, A. Moreno, J.J. Merelo and P. Chacon (eds) Advances in Artificial Life. Springer, Berlin. pp. 317–328.Google Scholar
  73. Wagner, G.P. and Schwenk, K. (2000) Evolutionarily stable configurations: functional integration and the evolution of phenotypic stability. Evol. Biol. 31, 155–217.Google Scholar
  74. Waitt, D.E. and Levin, D.A. (1993) Phenotypic integration and plastic correlations in Phlox drummondii (Polemoniaceae). Am. J. Bot. 80, 1224–1233.Google Scholar
  75. Weinig, C. (2000) Differing selection in alternative competitive environments: shade-avoidance responses and germination timing. Evolution 54, 124–136.Google Scholar
  76. Whitelam, G.C. and Devlin, P.F. (1998) Light signalling in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 36, 125–133.Google Scholar
  77. Whitelam, G.C., Patel, S. and Devlin, P.F. (1998) Phytochromes and photomorphogenesis in Arabidopsis. Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. London B, 353, 1445–1453.Google Scholar
  78. Windig, J.J. (1994) Genetic correlations and reaction norms in wing pattern of the tropical butterfly Bicyclus anynana. Heredity 73, 459–470.Google Scholar
  79. Winn, A.A. (1999) Is seasonal variation in leaf traits adaptive for the annual plant Dicerandra linearifolia? J. Evol. Biol. 12, 306–313.Google Scholar
  80. Wolf, J.B., Frankino, W.A., Agrawal, A.F., III E.D. Brodie and Moore, A.J. (2001) Developmental interactions and the constituents of quantitative variation. Evolution 55, 232–245.Google Scholar
  81. Yamaguchi-Shinozaki, K., Urao, T. and Shinozaki, K. (1995) Regulation of genes that are induced by drought stress in Arabidopsis thaliana. J. Plant Res. 108, 127–136.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of BotanyUniversity of TennesseeKnoxvilleUSA
  2. 2.Department of Ecology and Evolutionary BiologyUniversity of TennesseeKnoxvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations