, Volume 54, Issue 2, pp 285–290 | Cite as

The other side of the coin: The intricacies of author self-citations

  • P. Pichappan
  • S. Sarasvady


The present study views author self-citations, as a blend of experience and cognition of authors. This paper supports to lay down emphasis on consciousness and cognition of authors while assessing author self-citations.

Intézet neve Department of Library & Information Science Annamalai University 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Baird, L. M., Oppenheim, C. (1994), Do citations matter? Journal of Information Science, 20: 2–15.Google Scholar
  2. Bonzi, S., Snyder, H. W. (1991), Motivations for citations: a comparison of self citation and citation to others, Scientometrics, 2: 245–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Case, D. O., Higgins, G. M. (2000), How we can investigate citation behaviour?: A study of reasons for citing literature in communication, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 51: 635–645.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chubin, H. (1976), The conceptualisation of scientific specialities, Sociological Quarterly, 17: 448–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Crane, C. (1965), Scientists at major and minor universities: A study of productivity and recognition, Americian Sociological Review, 30: 699–714.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cronin, B. (1984), ThE Citation Process: The Role and Significance of Citations in Scientific Communication, London, Taylor Graham, p. 103.Google Scholar
  7. Garfield, E. (1970), Citation index for studying science, Nature, 227: 669–671.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Garfield, E. (1979), Citation Indexing: Its Theory and Application in Science, New York, Wiley.Google Scholar
  9. Gieryn, T. F. (1978), Problem retention and problem change in science, Sociological Inquiry, 48: 96–115.Google Scholar
  10. Gilbert, G. N. (1977), Referencing as persuasion, Social Studies of Science, 7: 113–122.Google Scholar
  11. Lawani, S. M. (1982), On the heterogeneity and classification of author self-citations, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 33: 281–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Leydesdorff, L. (1998), Theories of citation?, Scientometrics, 43: 5–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Macroberts, M. H., Macroberts, B. R. (1986), Quantitative measures of communication in science: A study of the formal level, Social Studies of Science, 16: 151–172.Google Scholar
  14. Magnusson, E. (1991), Character analysis of a science, Nature, 352: 103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Narin, F., Olivastro, D. (1986), National trends in physics and technology, Czechoslovak Journal of Physics, B36: 101–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Peters, H. P. F., Van Raan, A. F. J. (1991), Structuring scientific activities by co-author analysis. An exercise on a university faculty level, Scientometrics, 20: 235–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Trimble, V. (1986), Self-citation rates of astronomical papers, Czechoslovak Journal of Physics, B36: 175–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Vinkler, P. (1991), Possible causes of differences in information impact of journals, from different subfields, Scientometrics, 20: 145–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. White, M., Wang, P. (1997), A qualitative study of citing behaviour: Contributions, criteria, and multilevel documentation concerns, Library Quarterly, 67: 122–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Wouters, P. (1999), Beyond the Holy Grail: from citation theory to indicator theories, Scientometrics, 44: 561–580.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publisher/Akadémiai Kiadó 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • P. Pichappan
    • 1
  • S. Sarasvady
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Library & Information ScienceAnnamalai University AnnamalainagarIndia

Personalised recommendations