Euphytica

, Volume 125, Issue 3, pp 325–335

The Effect of Inoculum Pressure, Germplasm Selection and Environment on Spring Barley Cultivar Mixtures Efficacy

  • A. C. Newton
  • D. C. Guy
  • J. Nadziak
  • E. S. Gacek
Article

Abstract

A range of mixtures including one set made from cultivars grown in the UK and one from cultivars grown in Poland, were included, along with their component cultivars, in nine trials at Scottish Crop Research Institute, Dundee, UK or at the Experimental Plant Breeding Station of the IHAR, Baków near Kluczbork, Poland, over five seasons. The effects of inoculum pressure, plot size, fertiliser level and germplasm on mixture efficacy were investigated. In the four trials where inoculum pressure was controlled, mixtures reduced infection more at lower inoculum pressures, but this did not translate into yield benefit. Smaller plots increased mildew in monocultures but not mixtures. Fertiliser levels increased mildew levels but did not affect mixture efficacy. There were large differences between both Polish and UK germplasm, and between Polish and UK trial sites, but the performance of the mixtures compared with their respective monoculture components was similar within both germplasm groups and trial sites. Mixtures reduced lodging and affected plant height and heading date. The advantages of mixtures for improving yield, reducing fungicide applications and improving agronomic characteristics was demonstrated and there seems to be great potential for their further improvement and exploitation.

barley Blumeria graminis f.sp. hordei cultivar mixtures Erysiphe graminis inoculum pressure mildew 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Allard, R. W. (1960) Relationship between genetic diversity and consistency of performance in different environments, Crop Sci. 1, 127–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Brown, J. K. M. and Jørgensen, J. H. (1991) A catalogue of mildew resistance genes in European barley varieties, in J. Helms Jørgensen, Integrated Control of Cereal Mildews: Virulence Patterns and Their Change, pp. 263–286. Riso National Laboratory, Roskilde, Denmark.Google Scholar
  3. Chin, K. M. and Wolfe, M. S. (1984) The spread of Erysiphe graminis f. sp. hordei in mixtures of barley varieties, Plant Pathol. 33, 89–100.Google Scholar
  4. Clarkson, J. D. S. and Slater, S. E. (1996) Mildew of barley, United Kingdom Cereal Pathogen Virulence Survey Annual Report for 1995, pp. 34–43.Google Scholar
  5. Czembor, J. H. and Gacek, E. S. (1996) The use of cultivar and species mixtures to control diseases and for yield improvement in cereals in Poland, in E. Limpert, M. R. Finckh and M. S. Wolfe (eds), Integrated Control of Cereal Mildews and Rusts: Towards Co-ordination of Research Across Europe, pp. 177–184, Proc. Workshop COST 817, Zürich 5–10 Nov 1994, European Commission, Luxembourg, 276 p.Google Scholar
  6. Czembor, H. J. and Czembor, H. J. (1998) Powdery mildew resistance in cultivars of spring barley from Polish register, Plant Breeding and Cereal Science 42, 87–99.Google Scholar
  7. Finckh, M. R. and Mundt, C. C. (1992a) Stripe rust, yield and plant competition in wheat cultivar mixtures, Phytopathology 82, 905–913.Google Scholar
  8. Finckh, M. R. and Mundt, C. C. (1992b) Plant competition and disease in genetically diverse wheat populations, Oecologia 91, 82–92.Google Scholar
  9. Finckh, M. R., Gacek, E. S., Goyeau, H., Lannou, C., Merz, U., Mundt, C. C., Munk, L., Nadziak, J., Newton, A. C., de Vallavieille-Pope, C., and Wolfe, M. S. (2000) Cereal cultivar and species mixtures in practice, Agronomie: Plant Genetics and Breeding 20, 813–837.Google Scholar
  10. Gacek E. and Nadziak, J. (1988) Yield and susceptibility to powdery mildew (Erysiphe graminis f.sp. hordei) in cultivar mixtures of winter barley, Biuletyn Instytutu Hodowi i Aklimatyzacji Roslin 165, 5–14.Google Scholar
  11. Gacek E. S., Czembor, H. J., and Nadziak, J. (1996a) Disease restriction, grain yield and its stability in winter barley cultivar mixtures, in E. Limpert, M. R. Finckh and M. S. Wolfe (eds), Proceedings of the Third Workshop on Integrated Control of Cereal Mildews Across Europe, Kappel a. Albis, Switzerland, 5–9 Nov. 1994, pp. 185–190, European Commission DGXII, Brussells.Google Scholar
  12. Gacek, E. S., Finckh, M. R., and Wolfe, M. S. (1996b) Disease control and yield effects in spring feed and malting barley mixtures in Poland, in E. Limpert, M. R. Finckh and M.S. Wolfe (eds), Proceedings of the Third Workshop on Integrated Control of Cereal Mildews Across Europe, Kappel a. Albis, Switzerland, 5–9 Nov. 1994, pp. 203–208, European Commission DGXII, Brussells.Google Scholar
  13. Gacek, E. S., Strzembicka, H., and Wegrzyn, S. (1996c) Mixtures of spring wheat: their influence on powdery mildew and grain yield, in E. Limpert, M. R. Finckh and M. S. Wolfe (eds), Proceedings of the Third Workshop on Integrated Control of Cereal Mildews Across Europe, Kappel a. Albis, Switzerland, 5–9 Nov. 1994, pp. 193–196, European Commission DGXII, Brussells.Google Scholar
  14. Gieffers, W. and Hesselbach, J. (1988) Disease incidence and yield of different cereal cultivars in pure stands and mixtures. I. Spring barley (Hordeum vulgare L.), Zeitschrift für Flanzenkrankheiten und Pflanzenschutz 95, 46–62.Google Scholar
  15. Goleniewski, G. and Newton, A. C. (1994) Modelling mildew spread in cereal mixtures using a nearest neighbour approach: the effect of geometrical arrangement, Plant Pathol. 43, 631–643.Google Scholar
  16. Huang, R., Kranz, J., and Welz, H. G. (1994) Selection of pathotypes of Erysiphe graminis f. sp. hordei in pure and mixed stands of spring barley, Plant Pathol. 43, 458–470.Google Scholar
  17. Jeger, M. J., Griffiths, E., and Jones, D. G. (1981) Disease progress of non-specialised fungal pathogens in intraspecific mixed stands of cereal cultivars. I. Models, Ann. Appl. Biol. 98, 187–198.Google Scholar
  18. Mundt, C. C. and Browning, J. A. (1985) Development of crown rust epidemics in genetically diverse oat populations: effect of genotype unit area, Phytopathology 75, 607–610.Google Scholar
  19. Newton, A. C. (1997) Cultivar mixtures in intensive agriculture, in I. R. Crute, J. Burdon and E. Holub (eds), Gene-for-gene relationship in plant parasite interactions, pp. 65–80, CAB International, Wallingford, Oxford.Google Scholar
  20. Newton, A. C. and Hackett, C. A. (1994) Subjective components of mildew assessment on spring barley, Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 100, 395–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Newton, A. C., Ellis, R. P., Hackett, C. A., and Guy, D. C. (1997) The effect of component number on Rhynchosporium secalis infection and yield in mixtures of winter barley cultivars, Plant Pathol. 45, 930–938.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Newton, A. C., Swanston, J. S., Guy, D. C., and Ellis, R. P. (1998) The effect of cultivar mixtures on malting quality in winter and spring barley, J. Inst. Brew. 104, 41–45.Google Scholar
  23. Newton, A. C. and Swanston, J. S. (1999) Cereal variety mixtures reducing inputs and improving yield and quality – why isn't everybody growing them? Scottish Crop Research Institute Annual Report for 1998.Google Scholar
  24. Newton, A. C., Guy, D. C., Gaunt, R. E., and Thomas, W. T. B. (2000) The effect of powdery mildew inoculum pressure and fertiliser level on disease tolerance in spring barley, J. Plant Dis. Prot. 107, 67–73.Google Scholar
  25. Prasad, R., Singh, S., Sharma, S. N., and Singh, C. P. (1988) Studies on pure and mixed stands of wheat and barley under dryland agriculture conditions, J. Agron. Crop Sci. 160, 335–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Slater, S. E. and Clarkson, J. D. S. (1998) Mildew of barley, United Kingdom Cereal Pathogen Virulence Survey Annual Report for 1997, pp. 43–51.Google Scholar
  27. Snedecor, G. W. and Cochran, W. G. (1980) Statistical Methods, Seventh edition, Iowa State University Press, Ames, Iowa, USA, 507 pp.Google Scholar
  28. Stuke, F. and Fehrmann, H. (1988) Plant pathological aspects in winter cultivar mixtures, Zeitschrift für Pflanzenkrankheiten und Pflanzenschutz 95, 531–543.Google Scholar
  29. Swanston, J. S., Gacek, E., Guy, D. C., and Newton, A. C. (2000) Malting performance of barley cultivar mixtures from the UK and Poland, J. Inst. Brew. 106, 239–243.Google Scholar
  30. Tottman, D. R. (1987) The decimal code for cereal growth stages with illustrations, Ann. Appl. Biol. 110, 441–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Wolfe, M. S. and Barrett, J. A. (1980) Can we lead the pathogen astray? Plant Dis. 64, 148–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Wolfe, M. S. and Finckh, M. R. (1997) Diversity of host resistance within the crop: effects on host, pathogen and disease, in H. Hartleb, R. Heitefuss and H. H. Hoppe (eds), Resistance of crop plants, pp. 378–400, Gustav Fischer Verlag.Google Scholar
  33. Zhu, Y., Chen, H., Fan, J., Wang, Y., Li, Y., Chen, J., Fan, J., Yang, S., Hu, L., Leung, H., Mew, T. W., Teng, P. S., Wang, Z., and Mundt, C. C. (2000) Genetic diversity and disease control in rice, Nature 405, 718–722.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. C. Newton
    • 1
  • D. C. Guy
    • 1
  • J. Nadziak
    • 2
  • E. S. Gacek
    • 3
  1. 1.Scottish Crop Research Institute, InvergowrieDundeeScotland, UK
  2. 2.Experimental Plant Breeding Station of the IHARBaków near KluczborkPoland
  3. 3.COBORUStupia WielkaPoland

Personalised recommendations