Advertisement

Qualitative Sociology

, Volume 25, Issue 3, pp 359–383 | Cite as

Digitization, the Internet, and the Arts: eBay, Napster, SAG, and e-Books

  • Laura Robinson
  • David Halle
Article

Abstract

Via four case studies we explore the extent to which digitization is transforming how people access and engage with the arts. The first case study is the online auction house eBay. We focus on a unique system whereby millions of users rate each other's integrity and reputations in a digital venue via a transparent system open to all users and visitors alike. The second case study examines the Screen Actors Guild strike against the advertising industry, which drew attention to the potential for and limitation of the replacement of human actors by digitized replicas. Third, we focus on e-books in the context of the prediction that most books, music and film entertainment will eventually be distributed electronically to the average household. The fourth case study analyzes the Napster debate over file sharing and duplication of online music. We focus on the ability of Napster to create a huge community of users sharing their “own” copies of digital music. From this point of view Napster represented a uniquely efficient and large-scale dream, a modern form of the cooperation and sharing of property envisaged by classical anarchist philosophers of the nineteenth century. On the other hand, and as always in anarchistic uprisings, another class claimed proprietary ownership in the material being shared and saw in Napster mostly collective theft on the part of ordinary citizens. Three of these four case studies centrally involve ordinary people using the digital media in creative and innovative ways. We conclude by arguing, against those who are skeptical about the transforming power of digitization, that even in the short time that it has been widely available digitization has so increased people's ability to interact creatively with products that this amounts to a qualitative change which, over the next few decades, is likely to develop so far as to justify the label “revolution.”

arts technology eBay Napster digital books 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. Armbrust, R. (2000). Spot-pact talks ignore inflation. www.backstagewest.com, September 28.Google Scholar
  2. Bates, J. (2000a). SAG's new regime to face first test in talks over pay for commercials. Los Angeles Times, February 11, p. 5.Google Scholar
  3. Bates, J. (2000b). SAG's stalemate with advertising industry costs L.A. plenty. Los Angeles Times, June 16, p. 1.Google Scholar
  4. Boynton, R. S. (2000). You say you want an e-book revolution? Time Digital, December, 38-48.Google Scholar
  5. Bulletin Board (2000). www.aftraseattle.com/bulletin.htm.Google Scholar
  6. Calhoun, C. (1998). Community without propinquity revisited: Communications, technology and the transformation of the urban public sphere. Sociological Inquiry, 68, 373-397.Google Scholar
  7. Castells, M. (1996). The rise of the network society. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar
  8. Charney, B. (2000). “New Napster” won't be free. ZDNet News, October 31.Google Scholar
  9. Daniels, W. (2000). Why we actors are staging a strike. Los Angeles Times, September 10, p. 5.Google Scholar
  10. Dobrzynski, J. (2000a). Online bid soars to $135,805, provenance not guaranteed. New York Times, May 9, p. 1.Google Scholar
  11. Dobrzynski, J. (2000b). Seller admits making up details about art sold on Web. New York Times, May 10, p. 17A.Google Scholar
  12. Donahue, A. (2000). Net may become principal. www.variety.com, September 20.Google Scholar
  13. Drucker, P. (1999). Beyond the Information Revolution. Atlantic Monthly, October, 47-53.Google Scholar
  14. Gans, H. (1999). Popular culture and high culture: An analysis and evaluation of taste. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  15. Greenfield, K. T. (2000). Meet the Napster. Time, October 2, p. 60.Google Scholar
  16. Hakken, D. (1999). Cyborgs@cybrspace: An ethnographer looks to the future. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  17. Kaiser, L. F., & Kaiser, M. (1999). The official eBay guide to buying, selling, and collecting just about anything. New York: Fireside.Google Scholar
  18. Katz, J. (2000). The truth about file sharing. Posted to www.slash.com on January 2.Google Scholar
  19. Kendt, R. (2000). Striking differences. www.backstagewest.com, May 25.Google Scholar
  20. Kollock, P. (1999). The production of trust in online markets. In E. J. Lawler (Ed.), Advances in group processes (pp. 99-123). Greenwich: JAI Press.Google Scholar
  21. Luhman, N. (1979). Trust and power. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
  22. Mangis, C. (2002). Music for sale. www.pcmag.com, February 12.Google Scholar
  23. Mathieson, S. (2001). Let me be your fantasy. Guardian, April 26, p. 2.Google Scholar
  24. McCarthy, M. (2000a). Actors, advertisers square off: Non-union talent gets roles in ads. USA Today, May 3, p. 8B.Google Scholar
  25. McCarthy, M. (2000b). Animated cyber-performers take the center stage in ads: Special effects create walking, talking “people.” USA Today, June 2, p. 1B.Google Scholar
  26. Misztal, B. A. (1999). Trust in modern societies. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar
  27. Morse, A. (2000). One down, four to go. www.thestandard.com, October 31.Google Scholar
  28. Napster Artist Resources (2000). www.napster.com.Google Scholar
  29. New Artists Program (2000). www.napster.com.Google Scholar
  30. Price, D. L. (2000). Online auctions at eBay, 2nd edition: Bid with confidence, sell with success. Rocklin: Prima Publishing.Google Scholar
  31. Robb, D. (2000a). Actors run picket lines in strike against advertising industry. www.backstagewest. com, May 4.Google Scholar
  32. Robb, D. (2000b). Strike talks fall apart. www.backstagewest.com, September 28.Google Scholar
  33. Sayer, P. (2000). Stephen King's Plant withers. www.thestandard.com, November 29.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Human Sciences Press, Inc. 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of SociologyUniversity of California-Los AngelesLos Angeles

Personalised recommendations