Advertisement

Scientometrics

, Volume 54, Issue 3, pp 363–380 | Cite as

Web Impact Factors for Australasian universities

  • Alastair Smith
  • Mike Thelwall
Article

Abstract

In this paper we report on the results of an exploratory study of knowledge exchange between disciplines and subfields of science, based on bibliometric methods. The goal of this analysis is twofold. Firstly, we consider knowledge exchange between disciplines at a global level, by analysing cross-disciplinary citations in journal articles, based on the world publication output in 1999. Among others a central position of the Basic Life Sciences within the Life Sciences and of Physics within the Exact Sciences is shown. Limitations of analyses of interdisciplinary impact at the journal level are discussed. A second topic is a discussion of measures which may be used to quantify the rate of knowledge transfer between fields and the importance of work in a given field or for other disciplines. Two measures are applied, which appear to be proper indicators of impact of research on other fields. These indicators of interdisciplinary impact may be applied at other institutional levels as well.

Keywords

Academic Staff Research Assessment Exercise Commercial Search Engine Link Count Target Institution 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    R. R. Larson, Bibliometrics of the world wide web: An exploratory analysis of the intellectual structure of cyberspace, In Proceedings of the 1996 Annual ASIS Meeting, Baltimore (1996) pp. 71–79.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    T. C. Almind, P. Ingwersen, Informetric analyses on the World Wide Web: methodological approaches to “Webometrics”, Journal of Documentation, 53 (4) (1997) 404–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    R. Rousseau, Sitations: an exploratory study, Cybermetrics, 1 (1997). Available: http://www.cindoc.csic.es/cybermetrics/articles/v1i1p1.htmlGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    P. Ingwersen, Web Impact Factors, Journal of Documentation, 54 (2) (1998) 236–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    E. Garfield, The impact factor, Current Contents, (1994) June 20. Available: http://www.isinet.com/isi/hot/essays/journalcitationreports/7.htmlGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    M. Thelwall, Web Impact Factors and search engine coverage, Journal of Documentation, 56(2) (2000) 185–189.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    A. G. Smith, M. Thelwall, Web Impact Factors and university research links, In: Proceedings of the 8 th International Conference on Scientometrics and Informetrics, Vol. 2 (2001) pp. 657–664, Sydney: Bibliometric and Informetric Research Group, UNSW.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    A. G. Smith, A tale of two web spaces: comparing sites using web impact factors, Journal of Documentation, 55(5) (1999) 577–592.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    S. Lawrence, C. L. Giles, Accessibility of information on the Web. Nature, 400 (1999) 107–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    J. Gowrishankar, P. Divakar, M. Baylis, M. Gravenor, R. Kao, Sprucing up one's Impact Factor (two letters to the editor), Nature, 401 (1999) 321–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    World Higher Education Database 2000 (2000) London: Macmillan Reference. [CD-ROM]Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    M. Thelwall, Extracting macroscopic information from the web, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, (2002, to appear).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    M. Thelwall, Sources of links for academic Web Impact Factor calculations, Journal of Documentation, (2002, to appear).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Asiaweek , Asia's best universities 2000, (2000). Available: http://www.asiaweek.com/asiaweek/features/universities2000/rank_country/Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Detya, Higher Education Report for the 2000 to 2002 Triennium, (2001). Available: http://www.detya.gov.au/highered/he_report/2000_2002/html/3_8.htmGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    M. Thelwall, A Web crawler design for data mining, Journal of Information Science, 27 (2001) 319–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    R. Rousseau, Daily time series of common single word searches in AltaVista and NorthernLight, Cybermetrics, 2/3 (1998/9). Available: http://www.cindoc.csic.es/cybermetrics/articles/v2i1p2.htmlGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    J. Bar-Ilan, How much information the search engines disclose on the links to a web page? — A case study of the Cybermetrics home page, In: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Scientometrics & Informetrics, Sydney 16–20 July 2001 (2001) pp. 63–73. Sydney: Bibliometric and Informetric Research Group, UNSW.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    W. GlÄnzel, A. Schubert, Double effort = double impact? A critical view at international co-authorship in chemistry, Scientometrics, 50(2) (2001) 199–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    W. GlÄnzel, National characteristics in international scientific co-authorship relations, Scientometrics, 51(1) (2001) 69–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publisher/Akadémiai Kiadó 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alastair Smith
    • 1
  • Mike Thelwall
  1. 1.School of Communications and Information ManagementVictoria University of WellingtonAotearoa/New Zealand

Personalised recommendations