Photosynthesis Research

, Volume 72, Issue 1, pp 39–53 | Cite as

A fluorometric method for the differentiation of algal populations in vivo and in situ

  • M. BeutlerEmail author
  • K. H. Wiltshire
  • B. Meyer
  • C. Moldaenke
  • C. Lüring
  • M. Meyerhöfer
  • U.-P. Hansen
  • H. Dau


Fingerprints of excitation spectra of chlorophyll (Chl) fluorescence can be used to differentiate `spectral groups' of microalgae in vivo and in situ in, for example, vertical profiles within a few seconds. The investigated spectral groups of algae (green group, Chlorophyta; blue, Cyanobacteria; brown, Heterokontophyta, Haptophyta, Dinophyta; mixed, Cryptophyta) are each characterised by a specific composition of photosynthetic antenna pigments and, consequently, by a specific excitation spectrum of the Chl fluorescence. Particularly relevant are Chl a, Chl c, phycocyanobilin, phycoerythrobilin, fucoxanthin and peridinin. A laboratory-based instrument and a submersible instrument were constructed containing light-emitting diodes to excite Chl fluorescence in five distinct wavelength ranges. Norm spectra were determined for the four spectral algal groups (several species per group). Using these norm spectra and the actual five-point excitation spectrum of a water sample, a separate estimate of the respective Chl concentration is rapidly obtained for each algal group. The results of dilution experiments are presented. In vivo and in situ measurements are compared with results obtained by HPLC analysis. Depth profiles of the distribution of spectral algal groups taken over a time period of few seconds are shown. The method for algae differentiation described here opens up new research areas, monitoring and supervision tasks related to photosynthetic primary production in aquatic environments.

accessory pigments aquatic ecosystems chlorophyll fluorescence phytoplankton primary production 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Barlow RG, Cummings DG and Gibb SW (1997) Improved resolution of mono-and divinyl Chls a and b and zeaxanthin and lutein in phytoplankton extracts using reverse phase C-8 HPLC. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 161: 303-307Google Scholar
  2. Beutler M, Meyer B, Wiltshire, KH, Moldaenke, C and Dau H (1998) Rapid depth-profiling of the distribution of 'spectral groups' of microalgae in lakes, rivers and in the sea. The method and a newly-developed submersible instrument which utilizes excitation of Chl fluorescence in five distinct wavelength ranges. In: Garab G (ed) Photosynthesis: Mechanisms and Effects, Vol V, pp 4301-4304. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht/Boston/LondonGoogle Scholar
  3. Carrick HJ and Schelske CL (1997) Have we overlooked the importance of small phytoplankton in productive waters? Limnol Oceanogr 47: 1613-1621CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cowles TJ, Desiderio RA and Neuer S (1992) In situ characterization of phytoplankton from vertical profiles of fluorescence emission spectra. Mar Biol 115: 217-222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Dau H (1994a) Molecular mechanisms and quantitative models of variable Photosystem II fluorescence. Photochem Photobiol 60: 1-23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dau H (1994b) Short-term adaptation of plants to changing light intensities and its relation to Photosystem II photochemistry and fluorescence emission. J Photochem Photobiol B: Biol 26: 3-27 Dau H (1996) On the relation between absorption and fluorescence emission spectra of photosystems: derivation of a Stepanov relation for pigment clusters. Photosynth Res 48: 139-145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dau H and Sauer K (1996) Exciton equilibration and the Photosystem II exciton dynamics: a fluorescence study on Photosystem II membrane particles of spinach. Biochim Biophys Acta 1273: 175-190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Desiderio RA, Moore C, Lantz C and Cowles TJ (1997) Multiple excitation fluorometer for in situ oceanographic applications. Appl Optics 36: 1289-1296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Edgar RK and Laird K (1993) Computer simulation of error rates of Poisson-based interval estimates of plankton abundance. Hydrobiologia 264: 65-77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gerhardt V and Bodemer U (1998) Delayed fluorescence excitation spectroscopy: a method for automatic determination of phytoplankton composition of freshwater and sediments (intertidal) and of algal composition of benthos. Limnologica 28: 313-322Google Scholar
  11. Gilbert M, Wilhelm C and Richter M (2000) Bio-optical modelling of oxygen evolution using in vivo fluorescence: comparison of measured and calculated photosynthesis/irradiance (P-I) curves in four representative phytoplankton species. J Plant Physiol 157: 307-314Google Scholar
  12. Govindjee (1996) Sixty-three years since Kautsky: chlorophyll a fluorescence. Aust J Plant Physiol 22: 131-160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Guillard RR and Lorenzen CJ (1972) Yellow-green algae with chlorophyllide C. J Phycol 8: 10-12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Holm-Hansen O (1965) Fluorometric determination of Chl. J Cons Perm Int Explor Mer 30: 3-15Google Scholar
  15. Kiefer DA (1973) Fluorescence properties of natural phytoplankton populations. Mar Biol 22: 263-269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kolber ZS, Prasil O and Falkowski, PG (1998) Measurements of variable Chl fluorescence using fast repetition rate techniques: defining methodology and experimental protocols. Biochim Biophys Acta 1367: 88-106PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kolbowski J and Schreiber U (1995) Computer-controlled phytoplankton analyzer based on a 4-wavelength PAM Chl fluorometer. In: Mathis P (ed) Photosynthesis: From Light to Biosphere, Vol V, pp 825-828. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht/Boston/LondonGoogle Scholar
  18. Mantoura RFC and Lewellyn CA (1983) The rapid-determination of algal Chl and carotinoid-pigments and their breakdown products in natural-waters by reverse-phase high-performance liquid-chromatography. Ann Chim Acta 151: 297-314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Nusch E (1980) Comparison of different methods for Chl and phaeopigment determination. Arch Hydrobiol Beih Ergebnisse Limnol 14: 14-36Google Scholar
  20. Press WH (1989) Numerical Recipes. University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  21. Reuter W and Mueller C (1993) Adaptation of the photosynthetic apparatus of cyanobacteria to light and CO2. J Photochem Photobiol 21: 1011-1344Google Scholar
  22. Schreiber U (1998) Chlorophyll fluorescence: new instruments for special applications. In: Garab G (ed) Photosynthesis: Mechanisms and Effects, Vol V, pp 4253-4258. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht/Boston/LondonGoogle Scholar
  23. Tabrizi H, Schinner K, Spors J and Hansen UP (1998) Deconvolution of the three components of the photoacoustic signal by curve fitting and the relationship of CO2 uptake to proton fluxes. Photosynth Res 57: 101-115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. van den Hoek C, Mann DG and Jahns HM (1995) Algae: An Introduction to Phycology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UKGoogle Scholar
  25. van Thor JJ, Mullineaux CW, Matthijs HCP and Hellingwerf KJ (1998) Light harvesting and state transitions in cyanobacteria. Bot Acta 111: 430-443Google Scholar
  26. Wiltshire KH and Schroeder F (1994) Pigment patterns in suspended matter from the Elbe estuary, Northern Germany. Neth J Aquatic Ecol 28: 255-265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Yentsch CS and Menzel DW (1963) A method for the determination of phytoplankton Chl by fluorescence. Deep Sea Res 10: 1221-1231Google Scholar
  28. Yentsch CS and Phinney DA (1985) Spectral fluorescence: a taxonomic tool for studying the structure of phytoplankton populations. J Plankt Res 7: 617-632Google Scholar
  29. Yentsch CS and Yentsch CM (1979) Fluorescence spectral signatures: The characterization of phytoplankton populations by the use of excitation and emission spectra. J Mar Res 37: 471-483Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. Beutler
    • 1
    Email author
  • K. H. Wiltshire
    • 3
  • B. Meyer
    • 2
  • C. Moldaenke
    • 4
  • C. Lüring
    • 4
  • M. Meyerhöfer
    • 5
  • U.-P. Hansen
    • 1
  • H. Dau
    • 6
  1. 1.Zentrum für Biochemie und Molekularbiologie (ZBM)Universität KielKielGermany
  2. 2.Max-Planck-Institut (MPI) für LimnologiePlönGermany
  3. 3.Biologische Anstalt HelgolandHelgolandGermany
  4. 4.bbe MoldaenkeKiel-KronshagenGermany
  5. 5.Institut für Meereskunde (IfM)KielGermany
  6. 6.FB PhysikFreie Universität BerlinBerlinGermany

Personalised recommendations