Advertisement

Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture

, Volume 70, Issue 1, pp 61–68 | Cite as

Alternative selectable markers for potato transformation using minimal T-DNA vectors

  • P.J. Barrell
  • Shang Yongjin
  • P.A. Cooper
  • A.J. Conner
Article

Abstract

Alternative selection systems for plant transformation are especially valuable in clonal crops, such as potato (Solanum tuberosum L.), to pyramid transgenes into the same cultivar by successive transformation events. We have modified the pGPTV series of binary vectors to construct pMOA1 to pMOA5, resulting in a series of essentially identical binary vectors except for the presence of different selectable marker genes. These selectable marker genes are tightly inserted between the left and right T-DNA borders and confer resistance to kanamycin (nptII), hygromycin (hpt), methotrexate (dhfr), phosphinothricin (bar), or phleomycin (ble). The T-DNA of all the vectors is based on the minimal features necessary for plant transformation, with no extraneous DNA segments that may be unacceptable to regulatory authorities for general release of transgenic plants. A series of unique restriction sites exists between the right border and each selectable marker gene for subsequent insertion of useful genes. We have also developed improved culture procedures for potato transformation and used the pMOA1 to pMOA5 binary vectors to define stringent selection conditions for each marker gene. Combining these advances improved the frequency of recovering transformed potato plants while maintaining a low frequency of escapes. The relative efficiency of recovering transgenic potato lines with each selectable marker gene can be summarised as: kanamycin resistance>hygromycin resistance>phosphinothricin resistance>phleomycin resistance>methotrexate resistance.

binary vectors plant transformation potato selectable markers Solanum tuberosum T-DNA vectors 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Becker D, Kemper E, Schell J & Masterson R (1992) New plant binary vectors with selectable markers located proximal to the left T-DNA border. Plant Mol. Biol. 29: 1195–1197Google Scholar
  2. Bevan M (1984) Binary vectors for plant transformation. Nucleic Acids Res. 12: 8711–8721Google Scholar
  3. Conner AJ (1986) Isolation and characterisation of variants from plant cell culture. NZ J. Technol. 2: 83–94Google Scholar
  4. Conner AJ & Christey MC (1994) Plant breeding and seed marketing options for the introduction of transgenic insect-resistant crops. Biocontrol Sci. Technol. 4: 463–473Google Scholar
  5. Conner AJ & Jacobs JME (1999) Genetic engineering of crops as a potential source of genetic hazard in the human diet. Mut. Res. 443: 223–234Google Scholar
  6. Conner AJ, Williams MK, Gardner RC, Deroles SC, Shaw ML & Lancaster JE (1991) Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of New Zealand potato cultivars. NZ J. Crop Hort. Sci. 19: 1–8Google Scholar
  7. Conner AJ, Jacobs JME & Genet RA (1997) Transgenic potatoes versus ‘traditional’ potatoes: what's the difference? In: McLean GD, Waterhouse PM, Evans G & Gibbs MJ (eds) Commercialisation of Transgenic Crops: Risk, benefit and trade considerations (pp 23–36). Cooperative Research Centre for Plant Science and Bureau of Resource Sciences, CanberraGoogle Scholar
  8. El-Kharbotly A, Jacobs JME, te Lintel Hekkert B, Jacobsen E, Ramanna MS, Stiekema WJ & Pereira A (1996) Localization of Ds-transposon containing T-DNA inserts in the diploid transgenic potato: linkage to the R1 resistance gene against Phytophthora infestans (Mont.) de Bary. Genome 39: 249–257Google Scholar
  9. Enckevort LJG van, Bergervoet JEM, Stiekema WJ, Pereira A & Jacobsen E (2000) Selection of independent Ds transposon insertions in somatic tissue of potato by protoplast regeneration. Theor. Appl. Genet. 101: 503–510Google Scholar
  10. Haldrup A, Peterson SG & Okkels FT (1998a) The xylose isomerase gene from Thermoanaerobacterium thermosulfurogenes allows effective selection of transgenic plant cells using D-xylose as the selective agent. Plant Mol. Biol. 37: 287–296Google Scholar
  11. Haldrup A, Peterson SG & Okkels FT (1998b) Positive selection: a plant selection principle based on xylose isomerase, an enzyme used in the food industry. Plant Cell Rep. 18: 76–81Google Scholar
  12. Hellens R, Mullineaux P & Klee H (2000) A guide to Agrobac-terium binary vectors. Trends Plant Sci. 5: 446–451Google Scholar
  13. Höfgen R & Willmitzer L (1988) Storage of competent cells for Agrobacterium transformation. Nucleic Acids Res. 16: 9877Google Scholar
  14. Hood EE, Gelvin SB, Melchers LS & Hoekema A (1993) New Agrobacterium helper plasmids for gene transfer to plants. Transgenic Res. 2: 208–218Google Scholar
  15. Jacobs JME (1995) A genetic map of potato: construction and applications. PhD thesis, Wageningen Agricultural University, Wageningen, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  16. Murashige T & Skoog F (1962) A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol. Plant. 15: 473–497Google Scholar
  17. Perl A, Galili S, Shaul O, Ben-Tzvi I & Galili G (1993) Bacterial dihydrodipicolinate synthase and desensitized aspartate kinase: two novel selctable markers for plant transformation. Bio/technology 11: 715–718Google Scholar
  18. Rockhold DR, MacCree MM, & Belknap WR (2001). Transgenic potato (Solanum tuberosum L.). In: Bjaja YPS (ed) Transgenic Crops II: Biotechnology in agriculture and forestry (47) (pp 305–324). Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  19. Sambrook J, Fritsch EF & Maniatis T (1989). Molecular Cloning: A laboratory manual (2nd edn). Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NYGoogle Scholar
  20. Vayda ME & Belknap WR (1992) The emergence of transgenic potatoes as commercial products and tools for basic science. Transgenic Res. 1: 149–163Google Scholar
  21. Walbot V & Cullis C (1985) Rapid genomic changes in higher plants. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. 36: 367–396Google Scholar
  22. Wang G, Berg CM, Chen J, Young AC, Blakesley RW, Lee LY & Berg DE (1993) Creating nested deletions for sequencing cosmid DNAs. Focus 15: 47Google Scholar
  23. Zambryski PC (1992) Chronicles from the Agrobacterium-plant cell DNA transfer story. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 43: 465–490Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • P.J. Barrell
    • 1
    • 2
  • Shang Yongjin
    • 1
  • P.A. Cooper
    • 1
  • A.J. Conner
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.New Zealand Institute for Crop & Food Research LtdChristchurchNew Zealand
  2. 2.Soil, Plant and Ecological Sciences DivisionLincoln UniversityCanterburyNew Zealand

Personalised recommendations