Skin Penetration and Sun Protection Factor of Ultra-Violet Filters from Two Vehicles
- 293 Downloads
Purpose. In order to improve our knowledge on the efficacy and safety of sunscreen products, we measured the skin penetration profiles of ultra-violet (UV) filters in vitro and in vivo, and the corresponding sun protection factors (SPF) from two vehicles (an O/W emulsion-gel and petroleum jelly).
Methods. The UV filters tested were oxybenzone (5%, A), 2-ethylhexyl 4-methoxycinnamate (7.5%, B), and 2-ethylhexylsalicylate (3%, C). Two mg/cm2 were applied for 2 min to 6 h. In vitro penetration measurements were performed with static diffusion cells. In vivo, horny layer concentrations were measured after stripping and the SPF evaluated as recommended by the COLIPA-guidelines.
Results. Significant differences between vehicles were noticed in vitro as well as in vivo. In vitro, the emulsion-gel generated higher epidermal concentrations than petroleum jelly. Values at 6 h, expressed as percent of the applied dose for A, B, and C were 4, 9, and 7% for the emulsion-gel and 2, 1, and 2% for petroleum jelly. An opposite trend was noticed, mainly for A, in the deeper skin layers with concentrations of 2% in the dermis and 5% in the receptor fluid for petroleum jelly and 0.6% and 1% for the emulsion-gel respectively. In vivo, for each UV filter, maximal stratum corneum levels (15 strips) were obtained at 0.5 h with percentages of the applied doses of 50% for the emulsion-gel and 15% for petroleum jelly. SPFs, measured 0.5 h after application amounted to 14 for the emulsion-gel and 5 for petroleum jelly, and decreased in both cases by a factor 2.2 after removal of non penetrated product.
Conclusions. These preliminary results demonstrated that UV filters penetration and retention as well as expected SPF could be optimized by a suitable vehicle.
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.C. R. Taylor, R. S. Stern, J. J. Leyden, and B. A. Gilchrest. Photoaging/photodamage and photoprotection. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 22:1–15 (1990).Google Scholar
- 2.A. C. Watkinson, K. R. Brain, K. A. Walters, and J. Hadgraft. Prediction of percutaneous penetration of ultra-violet filters in sunscreen formulations. Int. J. Cos. Sci. 14:265–275 (1992).Google Scholar
- 3.G. H. Dahms. Choosing emollients and emulsifiers for sunscreen products. Cosmetics & Toiletries 109:45–52 (1994).Google Scholar
- 4.T. J. Franz. Percutaneous absorption. On the relevance of the in vitro data. J. Invest. Dermatol. 64:190–195 (1975).Google Scholar
- 5.Colipa Task Force. Sun protection factor test method, Bruxelles, 1994.Google Scholar
- 6.C. S. Okereke, M. S. Abdel-Rhaman, and M. A. Friedman. Disposition of benzophenone-3 after dermal administration in male rats. Toxicol. Lett. 73:113–122 (1994).Google Scholar
- 7.Y. Morimoto, T. Hatanaka, K. Sugibayashi, and H. Omiya. Prediction of skin permeability of drugs: comparison of human and hairless rat skin. J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 44:634–639 (1992).Google Scholar
- 8.R. J. Feldmann and H. I. Maibach. Absorption of some organic compounds through the skin in man. J. Invest. Dermatol. 54:399–404 (1970).Google Scholar
- 9.A. Rougier, D. Dupuis, C. Lotte, R. Roguet, and H. Schaefer. In vivo correlation between stratum corneum reservoir function and percutaneous absorption. J. Invest. Dermatol. 81:275–278 (1983).Google Scholar
- 10.J. C. Tsai, N. Weiner, G. L. Flynn, and J. J. Ferry. Drug and vehicle deposition from topical applications: localization of minoxidil within skin strata of the hairless mouse. Skin Pharmacol. 7:262–269 (1994).Google Scholar
- 11.V. Masini, F. Bonte, A. Meybeck, and J. Wepierre. Cutaneous bioavailability in hairless rats of tretinoin in liposomes or gel. J. Pharm. Sci. 82:17–21 (1993).Google Scholar
- 12.S. Brown and B. L. Diffey. The effect of applied thickness on sunscreen protection: in vivo and in vitro studies. Photochem. Photobiol. 44:509–513 (1986).Google Scholar