Journal of Medical Systems

, Volume 26, Issue 4, pp 285–292 | Cite as

Using DEA to Evaluate Efficiency and Formulate Policy Within a Greek National Primary Health Care Network

  • Athanasios I. Zavras
  • Georgios Tsakos
  • Charalabos Economou
  • John Kyriopoulos

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to critically evaluate the relative efficiency of primary health care centers of the principal Greek public insurance provider, the Social Security Institute (IKA). The source of the efficiency data was the Statistical Unit of IKA. Using Data Envelopment Analysis, we analyzed data from 133 centers nationwide. Input variables included the number of personnel, stratified in different categories, and the number of people covered by each health center. The number of pensioners enlisted to each health care facility was used as an index of aging and vulnerability of the covered population. According to the results of the study, centers with the technological infrastructure to perform laboratory and/or radiographic examinations exhibited higher efficiency scores. In addition, centers with eligible covered populations from 10,000 to 50,000 were found as the most efficient. Health sector reforms should be planned on the basis of such analyses. If the model is supplemented with valid demographic, socioeconomic, and epidemiological data, it may become the basis for the creation of a national health care chart, matching available resources to the population and its health care needs.

data envelopment analysis efficiency primary health care Greece 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.
    Abel-Smith, B., Calltorp, J., Dixon, M., Dunning, A., Evans, R., Holland, W., Jarman, B., and Mosialos, E., Report on the Greek Health Services, Ministry of Health and Welfare, Pharmetrika, Athens, 1994.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Tragakes, E., and Polyzos, N., The evolution of health care reforms in Greece: Charting a course of change. Int. J. Health Plann. Manage. 13:107–130, 1998.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kyriopoulos, J., and Levett, J., Health care reform in Greece. In Ritsatakis, A., Kyriopoulos, J., and Levett, J. (eds.), Neighbours in the Balkans. Initiating a Dialogue for Health, WHO EURO, National School of Public Health, Athens, pp. 56–60, 1999.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kyriopoulos, J., Gitona, M., and Karalis, G., Hidden economy, private spending and informal copayment in health care: The role of medical power in Greece. In Beazoglou, T., Heffley, D., and Kyriopoulos, J. (eds.), HumanResources Supply and Cost-Containment in Health Systems, FICOSSER and Exandas, Athens, pp. 269–281, 1998.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    European Commission. Citizens and Health Systems: Main Results from a Eurobarometer Survey, Eurostat, Luxemburg, 1998.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ministry of Health and Welfare. Health Care in Greece, Athens, p. 73, 1999.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Banker, R. D., Conrad, R. F., and Strauss, R. P., A comparative application at data envelopment analysis: An illustrative study of hospital production. Manage. Sci. 32:30–44, 1986.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Burgess, J., and Wilson, P. W., Hospital ownership and technical inefficiency. Manage. Sci. 42(1):110–123, 1996.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Rosko, M. D., Chilingerian, J. A., Zinn, J. S., and Aaronson, W. E., The effects of ownership, operating environment, and strategic choices on nursing-home efficiency. Med. Care 33:1001–1021, 1993.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ozcan, Y. A., and Luke, R. D., Anational study of the efficiency of hospitals in urban markets. Health Serv. Res. 27(6):719–739, 1993.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ersoy, K., Kavunkubasi, S., Ozcan, Y. A., and Harris, J. M., Technical efficiencies of Turkish hospitals: DEA approach, J. Med. Syst. 21(2):67–74, 1997.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hollingsworth, B., Maniadakis, N., and Thanassoulis, E., Efficiency-measured response. Health Serv. J. 25:109(5682):28–29, 1999.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Vitaliano, D.F., and Toren M., Cost and efficiency in nursing homes: A stochastic frontier approach. J. Health Econ. 13:281–300, 1994.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kooreman, P., Nursing-home care in the Netherlands—a non parametric efficiency analysis. J. Health Econ. 13:301–316, 1994.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Rosenman, R., Siddharthan, K., and Ahern, M., Output efficiency of health maintenance organization in Florida. Health Econ. 6:295–302, 1997.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Chilingerian, J., and Sherman, D. H., DEA and primary care physician report cards: Deriving preferred practice cones from managed care service concepts and operating strategies. Ann. Oper. Res. 73:35–66, 1997.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Tyler, L. H., Ozcan, Y. A., and Wogen, S. E., Mental health case management and technical efficiency. J. Med. Syst. 19(5):413–423, 1995.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ozcan, Y. A., McCue, M. J., and Okasha, A. A., Measuring the technical efficiency of psychiatric hospitals. J. Med. Syst. 20(3):141–150, 1996.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Sissouras, A., Mitropoulos, J., and Gounaris, C., Evaluating the efficiency of health care units: The case of the Greek primary health care centers. In Javor, A., van Eimeren, W., and Duru, G. (eds.), Proc. 7th Int. Conf. Syst. Sci. Health Care Sustain. Struct. Better Health, 29 May-2 June, Budapest, 2000.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Mitropoulos, I., Athanassopoulos, A., and Sissouras, A., Productive efficiency of the Social Insurance Health departments in Greece: Data envelopment analysis. Soc. Econ. Health 5(1):5–21, 1996. (In Greek)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Athanassopoulos, A., Gounaris, C., and Sissouras, A., A discriptive assessment of the cost and production efficiency of the general hospital in Greece. Health Care Manage. Sci. 2:2, 1999.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Athanassopoulos, A., Decision support for target-based resource allocation of public services in multilevel systems. Manage. Sci. 2:173–187, 1998.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Farrell, M., The measurement of productive efficiency. J. Royal Stat. Soc. 120:235–281, 1957.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Charnes, A., Cooper, W., and Rhodes, E., Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2(6):429–444, 1978.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Hollingsworth, B., Dawson, P., and Maniadakis, N., Efficiency measurement of health care: A review of non-parametric methods and applications. Health Care Manage. Sci. 2(3):161–172, 1999.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Chilingerian, J. A., Evaluation physician efficiency in hospitals: A multivariate analysis of the best practices. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 80:548–574, 1995.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Thanassoulis, E., Boussofiane, A., and Dyson, A., Exploring output quality targets in the provision of peninatal care in England using data envelopment analysis. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 80:588–607, 1995.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Zuckerman, S., Hadley, J., and Lezzoni, L., Measuring hospital efficiency with frontier cost function, J. Health Econ. 13:255–280, 1994.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Kyriopoulos, J., and Tsalikis, G., Health care reform in Greece. In Kyriopoulos, J., Tsalikis, G., and Levett, J. (eds.), Health Care Reform in the Balkan Region, Exandas, Athens, pp. 59–70, 1999.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Kyriopoulos, J., Gitona, M., Economou, Ch., and Karalis, G., Health inequalities and equity policies in Greece. In Javor, A., van Eimeren, W., and Duru, G. (eds.), Proc. 7th Int. Conf. Syst. Sci. Health Care Sustain. Struct. Better Health, 29 May-2 June, Budapest, pp. 239–242, 2000.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Athanasios I. Zavras
    • 1
    • 2
  • Georgios Tsakos
    • 2
    • 3
  • Charalabos Economou
    • 2
  • John Kyriopoulos
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Health Policy and EpidemiologyHarvard School of Dental MedicineBoston
  2. 2.Department of Health EconomicsNational School of Public HealthAthensGreece
  3. 3.Department of Epidemiology and Public HealthRoyal Free and University College, London Medical SchoolLondon

Personalised recommendations