American Journal of Community Psychology

, Volume 30, Issue 4, pp 493–510 | Cite as

The Evolution of Epistemology and Concepts in an Iterative-Generative Reflective Practice: The Importance of Small Differences

  • Brian J. Bishop
  • Christopher C. Sonn
  • Neil M. Drew
  • Natalie E. Contos


Using a contextualist epistemology, it would be expected that regional differences in community psychology would develop over time. It is argued that the epistemology and theory of Western Australian community psychology, while largely based on North American approaches, has developed its own idiosyncracies. These developed through the integration of practice and theory in an “iterative-generative” fashion. The process of development is conceptualized in terms of Schön's and Altman's distinctions between foundational knowledge, and professional and socially responsive knowledge (I. Altman, 1996; D. A. Schön, 1983). It has also been characterized as an incremental development based on the reflection on tacit and conceptual knowledge. From the small differences that have developed between regions, a dialogue can emerge that will better allow understanding of how social forces shape people's actions.

reflective research practice epistemology Western Australia 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Adams, D. (1988). The long dark teatime of the soul. London: Pan Books.Google Scholar
  2. Albee, G. W. (1977). The protestant ethic, sex and psychotherapy. American Psychologist, 32 150-161.Google Scholar
  3. Albee, G. W. (1982). The politics of nature and nurture. American Journal of Community Psychology, 10 4-36.Google Scholar
  4. Altheide, D. L., & Johnson, J. M. (1994). Criteria for assessing interpretive validity in qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 485-499). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  5. Altman, I. (1996). Higher education and psychology in the millennium. American Psychologist, 51 371-378.Google Scholar
  6. Altman, I., & Rogoff, B. (1984). World views in psychology: Trait, interactional, organismic, and transactional perspectives. In D. Stokals & I. Altman (Eds.), Handbook of environmental psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 1-40). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  7. Armistead, N. (1974). Reconstructing social psychology. Harmondsworth, England: Penguin.Google Scholar
  8. Barker, R. (1968). Ecological psychology. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Beckman, L. (1973). Psychology as a social problem: An investigation into the Society for the Psychological Studies of Social Issues. In “Radical Therapist”-“Rough Times Collective” (Ed.), Radical therapist. Harmondsworth, England: Penguin.Google Scholar
  10. Biglan, A. (1995). Changing cultural practices: A contextualist framework for intervention research. Reno, NV: Context Press.Google Scholar
  11. Biglan, A., & Hayes, S. C. (1996). Should the behavioral sciences become more pragmatic? The case for functional contextualism in the research on human behavior. Applied and Preventive Psychology, 5 47-57.Google Scholar
  12. Bishop, B. J., Pellegrini, S., Thomas, K., & Drew, M. D. (1998). Change and stability of rural communities: The function and coordination of formal and informal infrastructure of Western Australian eastern wheatbelt communities. Unpublished report, Curtin University, Perth.Google Scholar
  13. Bishop, B. J., & Syme, G. J. (1995). The social costs and benefits of urban consolidation: A time budget/contingent valuation approach. Journal of Economic Psychology, 16 223-245.Google Scholar
  14. Bishop, B. J., & Syme, G. J. (1996). Social change in rural settings: Lessons for community change agents. In D. R. Thomas & A. Veno (Eds.), Community Psychology and social change: Australian and New Zealand perspectives (pp. 157-181). Palmerston North, NZ: Dunmore Press.Google Scholar
  15. Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Bulhan, H. A. (1985). Frantz Fanon and the psychology of oppression. New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
  17. Buss, A. R. (1975). The emerging field of the sociology of psychological knowledge. American Psychologist, 30 988-1002.Google Scholar
  18. Caplan, N., & Nelson, S. D. (1973). On being useful: The nature and consequences of psychological research on social problems. American Psychologist, 28 199-211.Google Scholar
  19. Chalip, L. (1985). Policy research as social science: Outflanking the value dilemma. Policy Studies Review, 5 287-307.Google Scholar
  20. Cherns, A. (1982). Culture and values: The reciprocal influence between applied social science and its cultural and historical context. In N. Nicholson & T. D. Wall (Eds.), Theory and practice in organizational psychology. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  21. Comas-Díaz, L., Lykes, M. B., & Alarcón, R. D. (1998). Ethnic conflict and the psychology of liberation in Guatemala, Peru, and Puerto Rico. American Psychologist, 53 778-792.Google Scholar
  22. Davidson, G. (1995). Cognitive assessment of indigenous Australians: Towards a multiaxial model. Australian Psychologist, 30 30-34.Google Scholar
  23. Dewey, J. (1929). The quest for certainty: A study of the relation of knowledge and action. New York: Minton, Balch and Co.Google Scholar
  24. Dokecki, P. (1992). On knowing the community of caring persons: A methodological basis for the reflective generative practice of community psychology. Journal of Community Psychology, 20 26-35.Google Scholar
  25. Dokecki, P. R. (1996). The tragi-comic professional: Basic considerations for ethical reflectivegenerative practice. Pittsburgh, PA: Duquesne University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Douglas, B. G., & Moustakas, C. (1985). Heuristic inquiry: The internal search to know. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 25 39-55.Google Scholar
  27. Drew, N., & Bishop, B. J. (1995). Social impact assessment: Wherefore art thou Psychology. In W. Vialle (Ed.), Whypsychology? Wollongong, Australia: Australian Psychological Society.Google Scholar
  28. Elms, A. (1975). The crisis of confidence in social psychology. American Psychologist, 30 967-976.Google Scholar
  29. Freire, P. (1972). Pedagogy of the oppressed. Ringwood, Australia: Penguin.Google Scholar
  30. Gadamer, H. G. (1989). Truth and method (2nd Rev. ed.). New York: Crossroad.Google Scholar
  31. Gergen, K. (1973). Social psychology as history. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 26 309-320.Google Scholar
  32. Gergen, K. (1978). Experimentation in social psychology: A reappraisal. European Journal of Social Psychology, 8 507-527.Google Scholar
  33. Gergen, K. J. (1985). The social constructionist movement in modern psychology. American Psychologist, 40 266-275.Google Scholar
  34. Gergen, K. (1994). Exploring the postmodern: Perils or potentials. American Psychologist, 49 412-416.Google Scholar
  35. Gigerenzer, G. (1988). From tools to theories: The art of theory construction in cognitive psychology. Paper presented at the XXIII International Congress, Sydney.Google Scholar
  36. Jaeger, M. E., & Rosnow, R. L. (1988). Contextualism and its implications for psychological inquiry. British Journal of Psychology, 79 63-75.Google Scholar
  37. James, W. (1991). Pragmaticism. NewYork: Prometheus Books. (Original work published 1907)Google Scholar
  38. Kelly, J. G. (1986). Context and process: An ecological view of the independence of practice and research. American Journal of Community Psychology, 14 581-589.Google Scholar
  39. Kvale, S. (1992a). Introduction: From the archeology of the psyche to the architecture of cultural landscapes. In S. Kvale (Ed.), Psychology and postmodernism (pp. 1-16). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  40. Kvale, S. (1992b). Postmodern psychology: A contradiction in terms? In S. Kvale (Ed.), Psychology and postmodernism (pp. 31-57). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  41. Laird, F. (1989). The decline of deference: The political context of risk communication. Risk Analysis, 9 543-550.Google Scholar
  42. Mays, V. M., Bullock, M., Rosenzweig, M. R., & Wessells, M. (1998). Ethnic conflict: Global challenges and psychological perspectives. American Psychologist, 53 737-742.Google Scholar
  43. McGee, P. D. (1973). White conditioning of black dependency. Journal of Social Issues, 29 53-56.Google Scholar
  44. McGuire,W. (1973). The yin and yang of progress in social psychology: Seven koan. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 26 446-456.Google Scholar
  45. Moghaddam, F. M. (1987). Psychology in the three worlds: As reflected in the crisis in social psychology and the move toward indigenous third world psychology. American Psychologist, 42 912-920.Google Scholar
  46. Moghaddam, F. (1990). Modulative and generative orientations in psychology: Implications for psychology in the third world. Journal of Social Issues, 56 21-41.Google Scholar
  47. Moustakas, C. (1990). Heuristic research: Design, methodology and applications. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  48. Payne, R. L. (1982). The nature of knowledge and organisational psychology. In N. Nicholson & T. D. Wall (Eds.), Theory and method in organisational psychology (pp. 37-67). London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  49. Payne, R. L. (1996). Contextualism in context. International Review of Industrial and Organisational Psychology, 11 179-217.Google Scholar
  50. Pepper, S. C. (1942). World hypotheses. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  51. Pepper, S. C. (1966). Concept and quality. Le Salle: Open Court.Google Scholar
  52. Polanyi, M. (1966). The tacit dimension. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
  53. Polkinghorne, D. E. (1983). Methodology for the human sciences: Systems of inquiry. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  54. Polkinghorne, D. E. (1992). Postmodern epistemology of practice. In S. Kvale (Ed.), Psychology and postmodernism (pp. 146-165). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  55. Rapley, M., & Pretty, G. M. H. (1999). Playing procrutes: The interactional production of a “psychological sense of community.” Journal of Community Psychology, 27 695-713.Google Scholar
  56. Rappaport, J. (1977). Community psychology: Values, research and action. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
  57. Reiff, R. (1968). Social intervention and the problem of psychological analysis. American Psychologist, 23 524-531.Google Scholar
  58. Reiff, R. (1971). The danger of the techni-pro: Democratizing the human service professions. Social Policy, 2 62-64.Google Scholar
  59. Reiff, R. (1974). The control of knowledge: The power of the professionals. Journal of Applied Behavioral Analysis, 10 451-461.Google Scholar
  60. Riley, R. (1997). From exclusion to negotiation: The role of psychology in Aboriginal social justice. Bentley, WA: Curtin Indigenous Research Centre.Google Scholar
  61. Sampson, E. (1983). Justice and the critique of pure psychology. New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
  62. Samuelson, F. (1977). World War I intelligence and the development of psychology. Journal for the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 13 274-282.Google Scholar
  63. Sarason, S. B. (1974). The psychological sense of community: Prospects for a community psychology. San Francisco: Josey-Bass.Google Scholar
  64. Sarason, S. (1979, July/August). Closing time. Society, 36-39.Google Scholar
  65. Sarason, S. (1981). Psychology misdirected. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  66. Sarason, S. B. (1982). Psychology and social action: Selected papers. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
  67. Sarason, S. B. (1984). If it can be studied or developed, should it be. American Psychologist, 39 477-485.Google Scholar
  68. Sawyer, J., & Senn, D. J. (1973). Institutional racism and the American Psychological Association. Journal of Social Issues, 29 67-80.Google Scholar
  69. Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  70. Seidman, E. (1983). Unexamined premises of social problem solving. In E. Seidman (Ed.), Handbook of social intervention. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  71. Sherif, M., & Hovland, C. J. (1961). Social judgement. Hew Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  72. Silverman, I. (1977). Why social psychology fails. Canadian Psychological Review, 18 353-358.Google Scholar
  73. Sinha, D. (1997). Indigenising psychology. In J. W. Berry, Y. Poortinga, & J. Pandey (Eds.), Handbook of crosscultural psychology: Theory and method (vol. 1, 2nd ed.) (pp. 129-169). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
  74. Smith, L. T. (1999). Decolonising methodologies: Research indigenous peoples. Otago, New Zealand: Otago University press.Google Scholar
  75. Smith, M. B. (1994). Selfhood at risk: Postmodern perils and the perils of postmodernism. American Psychologist, 49 405-411.Google Scholar
  76. Syme, G. J., & Bishop, B. J. (1993). Public psychology: Planning a role for psychology. Australian Psychologist, 28 45-51.Google Scholar
  77. Throgmorton, J. (1991). The rhetorics of policy analysis. Policy Sciences, 24 153-179.Google Scholar
  78. Toulmin, S., & Leary, D. (1985). The cult of empiricism in psychology and beyond. In S. Koch & D. Leary (Ed.), A century of psychology as science (pp. 594-617). New York: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
  79. Trickett, E. J., Barone, C., & Buchanan, R. M. (1996). Elaborating developmental contextualism in adolescent research and intervention: Paradigm contributions from community psychology. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 6 245-269.Google Scholar
  80. Trickett, E. J., Kelly, J. G., & Vincent, T. A. (1985). The spirit of ecological inquiry in community research. In E. C. Susskind & D. C. Klein (Eds.), Knowledge building in community (pp. 283-333). New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
  81. Wicker, A. W. (1979). An introduction to ecological psychology. Monterrey, CA: Brooks/Cole.Google Scholar
  82. Wicker, A. (1989). Substantive theorizing. American Journal of Community Psychology, 17 531-547.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Brian J. Bishop
    • 1
  • Christopher C. Sonn
    • 2
  • Neil M. Drew
    • 2
  • Natalie E. Contos
    • 1
  1. 1.Curtin University of TechnologyUSA
  2. 2.Edith Cowan UniversityUSA

Personalised recommendations