Plant and Soil

, Volume 240, Issue 1, pp 191–199 | Cite as

Abscisic acid concentration, root pH and anatomy do not explain growth differences of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) and lupin (Lupinus angustifolius L.) on acid and alkaline soils

  • Wolfram HartungEmail author
  • Laurent Leport
  • R. George Ratcliffe
  • Angela Sauter
  • Regina Duda
  • Neil C. Turner


The ABA concentrations of leaves, roots, soils and transport fluids of chickpea and lupin plants growing in acid (pH=4.8) and alkaline (pH=8.0) soils and an acid soil with an alkaline subsoil and an alkaline soil with an acid subsoil were measured with the aim of explaining the poor growth of narrow-leafed lupins in alkaline soil. The ABA concentration in the leaves was higher in lupin than chickpea, but did not differ when the plants were grown in alkaline compared to acid soil. The ABA concentration of the roots and xylem sap of lupin did not differ significantly when grown in acid or alkaline soil. Chickpea roots and xylem sap had, however, lower ABA concentrations in acid soil. The ABA concentration in the soil solution was higher in the acid than in the alkaline soil. Roots of lupin and chickpea showed no suberization of the hypodermis or exodermis whether grown aeroponically or hydroponically and the pH of the cytoplasm did not change significantly when root cells of lupin and chickpea were exposed to external pHs of 4.8 or 8.0. The chickpea roots had greater suberization of the endodermal cells adjacent to radial xylem rays and maintained a slightly higher vacuolar pH than lupin in both acid and alkaline external media, but these small differences are insufficient to explain the reductions in lupin growth in alkaline soil.

apoplastic barriers duplex soils pH regulation root morphology 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Atwell B J 1991 Factors which affect the growth of grain legumes on a solonized brown soil. II. Genotypic responses to soil chemical factors. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 42, 107-119.Google Scholar
  2. Brundrett M C, Enstone D E and Peterson C A 1988 A berberineaniline blue fluorescent staining procedure for suberin, lignin, and callose in plant tissue. Protoplasma 146, 133-142.Google Scholar
  3. Cutler A J and Kronchko J E 1999 Formation and breakdown of ABA. Trends Plant Sci. 4, 472-478.Google Scholar
  4. Daeter W, Slovik S and Hartung W 1993 The pH gradients in the root system and the abscisic acid concentration in xylem and apoplastic saps. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London, Ser. B 341, 49-56.Google Scholar
  5. Degenhardt B, Gimmler H, Hose E and Hartung W 2000 Effect of alkaline and saline substrates on ABA-content,-distribution and-transport in plant roots. Plant Soil 225, 83-94.Google Scholar
  6. Dracup M, Turner N C, Tang C, Reader M and Palta J 1998 Responses to abiotic stresses. In Lupins as Crop Plants: Biology, Production and Utilization. Eds. J S Gladstones, C A Atkins and J Hamblin. pp 227-262. CAB International, Wallingford.Google Scholar
  7. Fox G G and Ratcliffe R G 1990 31P NMR observations on the effect of the external pH on the intracellular pH values in plant cell suspension cultures. Plant Physiol. 93, 512-521.Google Scholar
  8. Freundl E, Steudle E and Hartung W 2000 Apoplastic transport of abscisic acid across maize roots. The role of the exodermis. Planta 210, 222-231.Google Scholar
  9. Gout E, Bligny R and Douce R 1992 Regulation of intracellular pH values in higher plant cells. Carbon-13 and phosphorus-31 nuclear magnetic resonance studies. J. Biol. Chem. 267, 13903-13909.Google Scholar
  10. Hartung W, Zhang J and Davies W J 1994 Does abscisic acid play a stress physiological role in maize plants growing in heavily compacted soil? J. Exp. Bot. 45, 221-226.Google Scholar
  11. Hartung W, Sauter A, Turner N C, Fillery I and Heilmeier H 1996 Abscisic acid in soils: What is its function and which factors and mechanisms influence its concentration? Plant Soil 184, 105-110.Google Scholar
  12. Hartung W and Turner N C 1997 Abscisic acid relations in stressed roots. In The Biology of Root Formation and Development. Eds. A Altman and Y Waisel. pp 125-132. Plenum Press, New York.Google Scholar
  13. Jayasundara H P S, Thomson B D and Tang C 1998 Responses of cool season grain legumes to soil abiotic stresses. Adv. Agron. 63, 77-151.Google Scholar
  14. Lee R B and Ratcliffe R G 1983 Development of an aeration system for use in plant tissue NMR experiments. J. Exp. Bot. 34, 1213-1221.Google Scholar
  15. Perumalla C J, Peterson C A and Enstone D E 1990 A survey of angiosperm species to detect hypodermal Casparian bands. I. Roots with a uniserate hypodermis and epidermis. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 103, 93-112.Google Scholar
  16. Ratcliffe R G 1994 In vivo NMR studies of higher plants and algae. Adv. Bot. Res. 20, 43-123.Google Scholar
  17. Saab I N, Sharp R E, Pritchard J and Voetberg G S 1990 Increased endogenous abscisic acid maintains primary root growth and inhibits shoot growth of maize seedlings at low water potentials. Plant Physiol. 1329-1336.Google Scholar
  18. Siddique K H M, Loss S P, Regan K L and Jettner R L 1999 Adaptation and seed yield of cool season grain legumes in Mediterranean environments of south-western Australia. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 50, 375-387.Google Scholar
  19. Slovik S, Daeter Wand Hartung W 1995 Compartmental redistribution and long distance transport of abscisic acid (ABA) in plants as influenced by environmental changes in the rhizosphere. A biomathematical model. J. Exp. Bot. 46, 881-894.Google Scholar
  20. Spickett C M, Smirnoff N and Ratcliffe R G 1993 An in vivo nuclear magnetic resonance investigation of ion transport in maize (Zea mays) and Spartina anglica roots during exposure to high salt concentrations. Plant Physiol. 102, 629-638.Google Scholar
  21. Tang C, Longecker N E, Thompson C J, Greenway H and Robson A D 1992 Lupin (Lupinus angustifolius L.) and pea (Pisum sativum L.) roots differ in their sensitivity to pH above 6.0. Plant Physiol. 140, 715-719.Google Scholar
  22. Tang C, Kuo J, Longecker N E, Thompson C J and Robson A D 1993a High pH causes disintegration of the root surface in Lupinus angustifolius. Ann. Bot. 71, 201-207.Google Scholar
  23. Tang C, Cobley B T, Mokhtara S, Wilson C E and Greenway H 1993b High pH in the nutrient solutions impairs water uptake in Lupinus angustifolius. Plant Soil. 155/156, 517-519.Google Scholar
  24. Tang C, Robson A D, Longecker N E and Buirchell B J 1995 The growth of Lupinus species on alkaline soils. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 46, 255-268.Google Scholar
  25. Tang C, Longecker N E, Greenway H and Robson A D 1996 Reduced root elongation of Lupinus angustifolius L. by high pH is not due to decreased membrane integrity of cortical cells or low proton production by the roots. Ann. Bot. 78, 409-414.Google Scholar
  26. Tang C and Turner N C 1999 The influence of alkalinity and water stress on the stomatal conductance, photosynthetic rate and growth of Lupinus augustifolius L. and Lupinus pilosus Murr. Aust. J. Exp. Agric. 39, 457-464.Google Scholar
  27. Tennant D, Schulz G, Dixon J and Purdie B 1992 Physical and chemical characteristics of duplex soils and their distribution in the south-west of Western Australia. Aust. J. Exp. Agric. 32, 827-843.Google Scholar
  28. Thomson B D, Siddique K H M, Barr M D and Wilson J M 1997 Grain legume species in low rainfall Mediterranean-type environments. I. Phenology and seed yield. Field Crops Res. 54, 173-187.Google Scholar
  29. Weiler E W 1986 Plant hormone immunoassay based on monoclonal and polyclonal antibodies. In Modern Methods of Plant Analysis. Vol. 4. Eds. H F Linskens and J P Jackson. pp 1-17. Springer Verlag, Berlin.Google Scholar
  30. Wolf O, Jeschke W D and Hartung W 1990 Long distance transport of abscisic acid in salt stressed Lupinus albus plants. J. Exp. Bot. 41, 593-600.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Wolfram Hartung
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Laurent Leport
    • 1
    • 3
  • R. George Ratcliffe
    • 4
  • Angela Sauter
    • 2
  • Regina Duda
    • 5
    • 6
  • Neil C. Turner
    • 1
  1. 1.Centre for Legumes in Mediterranean AgricultureUniversity of Western AustraliaCrawleyAustralia
  2. 2.Lehrstuhl Botanik 1, Julius-von-Sachs-Institut für BiowissenschaftenUniversität WürzburgWürzburgGermany
  3. 3.UMR 6026, Université de Rennes 1Rennes CedexFrance
  4. 4.Department of Plant SciencesUniversity of OxfordOxfordU.K
  5. 5.CSIRO Plant IndustryWembleyAustralia
  6. 6.Institute of Plant NutritionFreisingGermany

Personalised recommendations