Pharmaceutical Research

, Volume 9, Issue 5, pp 663–669 | Cite as

Predicting Skin Permeability

  • Russell O. Potts
  • Richard H. Guy


Published permeability coefficient (Kp) data for the transport of a large group of compounds through mammalian epidermis were analyzed by a simple model based upon permeant size [molecular volume (MV) or molecular weight (MW)] and octanol/water partition coefficient (Koct). The analysis presented is a facile means to predict the percutaneous flux of pharmacological and toxic compounds solely on the basis of their physicochemical properties. Furthermore, the derived parameters of the model have assignable biophysical significance, and they provide insight into the mechanism of molecular transport through the stratum corneum (SC). For the very diverse group of chemicals considered, the results demonstrate that SC intercellular lipid properties alone are sufficient to account for the dependence of Kp upon MV (or MW) and Koct. It is found that the existence of an “aqueous-polar (pore) pathway” across the SC is not necessary to explain the Kp values of small, polar nonelectrolytes. Rather, their small size, and consequently high diffusivity, accounts for their apparently larger-than-expected Kp. Finally, despite the size and breadth of the data set (more than 90 compounds with MW ranging from 18 to >750, and log Koct ranging from −3 to + 6), the postulated upper limiting value of Kp for permeants of very high lipophilicity cannot be determined. However, the analysis is able to define the physicochemical characteristics of molecules which should exhibit these maximal Kp values. Overall, then, we present a facile interpretation of a considerable body of skin permeability measurements that (a) very adequately describes the dependence of Kp upon permeant size and lipophilicity, (b) generates parameters of considerable physicochemical and mechanistic relevance, and (c) implies that the SC lipids alone can fully characterize the barrier properties of mammalian skin.

skin permeability partition coefficient molecular volume lipid lamellae stratum corneum 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    B. Idson and C. R. Behl. Drug structure vs. penetration. In Transdermal Delivery of Drugs, Vol III, A. F. Kydonieus and B. Berner (eds.), CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 1987, pp. 85–151.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    G. L. Flynn and B. Stewart. Percutaneous drug penetration; Choosing candidates for transdermal development. Drug Dev. Res. 13:169–185 (1988).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    C. Ackermann, G. L. Flynn, and W. M. Smith. Ether-water partitioning and permeability through hairless mouse skin in vitro. II. Hydrocortisone 21-n-alkyl esters, alkanols and hydrophilic compounds. Int. J. Pharm. 36:67–71 (1987).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    G. L. Flynn. Physicochemical determinants of skin absorption. In Principles of Route-to-Route Extrapolation for Risk Assessment, T. R. Gerrity and C. J. Henry (eds.), Elsevier, New York, 1990, pp. 93–127.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    R. J. Scheuplein and I. H. Blank. Molecular structure and diffusional processes across intact skin. Report to the US Army Chemical R&D Laboratories, Edgewood Arsenal, MD 1967.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    W. R. Lieb and W. D. Stein. Implications of two different types of diffusion for biological membranes. Nature 234:219–222 (1971).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    M. H. Cohen and D. Turnbull. Molecular transport in liquids and gases. J. Chem. Phys. 31:1164–1169 (1959).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    W. R. Lieb and W. D. Stein. Non-Stokesian nature of transverse diffusion within human red cell membranes. J. Membr. Biol. 92:111–119 (1986).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    G. B. Kasting, R. L. Smith, and E. R. Cooper. Effect of lipid solubility and molecular size on percutaneous absorption. In Skin Pharmacokinetics, B. Shroot and H. Schaefer (eds.), Karger, Basel, 1987, pp. 138–153.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    G. B. Kasting, R. L. Smith, and B. D. Anderson. Prodrugs for dermal delivery: Solubility, molecular size and functional group effects. In Prodrugs and Their Topical Use, K. B. Sloan (ed.), Marcel Dekker, New York, 1992 (in press).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    A. Bondi. van der Waals volumes and radii. J. Phys. Chem. 68:441–452 (1964).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    W. R. Lieb and W. D. Stein. Biological membranes behave as non-porous polymer sheets with respect to diffusion of nonelectrolytes. Nature 224:240–243 (1967).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    J. M. Diamond and Y. Katz. Interpretation of nonelectrolyte partition coefficients between dimyristoyl lecithin and water. J. Membr. Biol. 17:127–154 (1974).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    M. S. Roberts, R. A. Anderson, and J. Swarbrick. Permeability of human epidermis to phenolic compounds. J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 29:677–683 (1977).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    R. H. Guy and J. Hadgraft. Physicochemical aspects of percutaneous penetration and its enhancement. Pharm. Res. 5:753–758 (1988).Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    D. Southwell, B. W. Barry, and R. Woodford. Variations in permeability of human skin and between specimens. Int. J. Pharm. 18:299–309 (1984).Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    R. O. Potts and M. L. Francoeur. Lipid biophysics of water loss through the skin. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 87:3871–3873 (1990).Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    H. Trauble and D. H. Haynes. The volume change in lipid bilayer lamellae at the crystalline-liquid crystalline phase transition. Chem. Phys. Lipids 7:324–335 (1971).Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    B. D. Anderson and P. V. Raykar. Solute structure-permeability relationships in human stratum corneum. J. Invest. Dermatol. 93:280–286 (1989).Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    R. O. Potts and M. L. Francoeur. The influence of stratum corneum morphology on water permeability. J. Invest. Dermatol. 96:495–499 (1991).Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    B. D. Anderson, W. I. Higuchi, and P. V. Raykar. Heterogeneity effects on permeability-partition coefficient relationships in human stratum corneum. Pharm. Res. 5:566–573 (1988).Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    G. L. Flynn, H. Durrheim, and W. I. Higuchi. Permeation of hairless mouse skin. II. Membrane sectioning and influence on alkanol permeabilities. J. Pharm. Sci. 70:52–56 (1981).Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    R. J. Scheuplein and I. H. Blank. Permeability of the skin. Physiol. Rev. 51:702–747 (1971).Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    R. H. Guy, R. S. Hinz, and M. Amantea. Solute transport and penetration at liquid/liquid interfaces. Faraday Disc. Chem. Soc. 77:127–137 (1984).Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Pomona College Medicinal Chemistry (MEDCHEM) database. Pomona College, Claremont, CA, 1984.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    D. A. Haydon, B. M. Hendry, S. R. Levinson, and J. Requena. A comparative study of nerve impulse blockage and the properties of black lipid membranes. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 470:17–34 (1977).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • Russell O. Potts
    • 1
  • Richard H. Guy
    • 2
  1. 1.Cygnus Therapeutic SystemsRedwood City
  2. 2.Departments of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical ChemistryUniversity of California—San FranciscoSan Francisco

Personalised recommendations