Pharmaceutical Research

, Volume 9, Issue 8, pp 1029–1034

The Transport Barrier of Epithelia: A Comparative Study on Membrane Permeability and Charge Selectivity in the Rabbit

  • Yongyut Rojanasakul
  • Li-Ying Wang
  • Meenakshi Bhat
  • Douglas D. Glover
  • Carl J. Malanga
  • Joseph K. H. Ma
Article

Abstract

The transport barrier of the epithelia presents one of the major problems limiting the effective use of these tissues as alternate delivery routes for macromolecules such as peptides and proteins. In the present study, two membrane transport properties, namely, the permeability and permselectivity of the shunt pathway, were investigated and compared in various tissues including the nasal, tracheal, bronchial, buccal, rectal, vaginal, corneal, epidermal, duodenal, jejunal, ileal, and colonic epithelia. Membrane permeability was evaluated using a combined method based on electrical conductance and flux measurements of a hydrophilic fluorescent probe, 6-carboxy fluorescein (CF). Membrane permselectivity or the charge discriminating ability of the membrane was evaluated by KCl diffusion potential measurements. The results indicate that all epithelia under investigation possess a relatively high degree of permeation barrier and are highly selective for the absorption of positively charged solutes. Shunt path permeability was found to vary greatly among tissues from different epithelia, whereas membrane charge selectivity was relatively constant in these tissues. A good correlation was observed between membrane electrical conductance and steady-state flux of CF, indicating a paracellular transport of the compound. The rank order of the intrinsic membrane permeability was as follows: intestinal≈ nasal ≥ bronchial ≥ tracheal > vaginal ≥ rectal > corneal > buccal > skin. Membrane permselectivity, expressed as the ratio of transport number (positive over negative), ranges from 1.78 for the buccal to 1.33 for the rectal epithelium. These results suggest that, for effective delivery purposes, permeation enhancing methods, by either increasing tissue permeability or modifying drug-membrane charge selectivity, are generally required. The permeation data also suggest that the respiratory epithelia represent good alternate routes for drug delivery, particularly for those that are orally ineffective, i.e., due to extensive gastrointestinal tract degradation or first-pass metabolism.

epithelial transport permeability permselectivity absorption electrical resistance electrical conductance diffusion potential 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.
    D. C. Corbo, J. C. Liu, and Y. W. Chien. Characterization of the barrier properties of mucosal membranes. J. Pharm. Sci. 79:202–206 (1990).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    B. J. Aungst, N. J. Rogers, and E. Shefter. Comparison of nasal, rectal, sublingual and intramuscular insulin efficiency and the effects of a bile salt absorption promoter. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 244:23–27 (1987).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    E. Fromter and J. Diamond. Route of passive ion permeation in epithelia. Nature New Biol. 53:9–13 (1972).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Y. Rojanasakul and J. R. Robinson. Electrophysiological and ultrastructural characterization of the cornea during in vitro perfusion. Int. J. Pharm. 63:1–16 (1990).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    P. H. Barry and J. M. Diamond. Junction potentials, electrode standard potentials and other problems in interpreting electrical properties of membranes. J. Membr. Biol. 3:93–122 (1970).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    R. A. Robinson and R. H. Stokes. Electrolytic Solutions, Butterworths, London, 1959.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Y. Rojanasakul and J. R. Robinson. Transport mechanisms of the cornea: Characterization of barrier permselectivity. Int. J. Pharm. 55:237–246 (1989).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    L. A. Stoehelin. Structure and function of intercellular junctions. Int. Rev. Cytol. 39:210 (1974).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    S. G. Schultz, R. A. Frizzell, and H. N. Nellans. Active sodium transport and the electrophysiology of rabbit colon. J. Membr. Biol. 33:351–384 (1977).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    D. W. Powell. Barrier function of epithelia. Am. J. Physiol. 241:G275 (1981).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    M. A. Wheatley, J. Dent, E. B. Wheeldon, and P. L. Smith. Nasal drug delivery: An in vitro characterization of transepithelial electrical properties and fluxes in the presence or absence of enhancers. J. Control. Release 8:167–177 (1988).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    M. J. Welsh. Electrolyte transport by airway epithelia. Physiol. Rev. 67:1143–1184 (1987).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    M. Hayashi, T. Hirasawa, T. Muraoka, M. Shiga, and S. Awazu. Comparison of water influx and seiving coefficient in rat jejunal, rectal, and nasal absorption of antipyrine. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 33:2149–2152 (1985).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    A. E. Taylor and K. A. Gaar. Estimation of equivalent pore radii of pulmonary capillary and alveolar membranes. Am. J. Physiol. 218:1133–1140 (1970).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    C. McMartin, L. E. F. Huctchinson, R. Hyde, and G. E. Peters. Analysis of structural requirements for the absorption of drugs and macromolecules from the nasal cavity. J. Pharm. Sci. 76:535–540 (1987).Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    S. Hirai, T. Yashiki, and H. Mima. Mechanisms for the enhancement of the nasal absorption of insulin by surfactants. Int. J. Pharm. 9:173–184 (1981).Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    R. E. Stratford and V. H. L. Lee. Aminopeptidase activity in homogenates of various absorptive mucosae in the albino rabbit: Implication in peptide delivery. Int. J. Pharm. 30:73–82 (1986).Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Y. Rojanasakul, S. W. Paddock, and J. R. Robinson. Confocal laser scanning microscopic examination of transport pathways and barriers of some peptides across the cornea. Int. J. Pharm. 61:163–172 (1990).Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Y. Rojanasakul. Mechanistic Studies of Ocular Peptide Absorption and Its Enhancement by Various Penetration Enhancers, Ph.D. dissertation, University of Wisconsin—Madison, 1989.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    R. L. Dickinson. Human Sex Anatomy, Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore, MD, 1949, c. 2–3.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    R. Scheuplein. Mechanisms of percutaneous absorption II: Transient diffusion and the relative importance of various routes of skin penetration. J. Invest. Dermatol. 45:334 (1967).Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    F. M. Wigley, J. H. Londono, and S. H. Wood. Insulin across respiratory mucosae by aerosol delivery. Diabetes 20:552–556 (1971).Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    A. Adjei and J. Garren. Pulmonary delivery of peptide drugs: Effect of particle size on bioavailability of leuprolide acetate in healthy male volunteers. Pharm. Res. 7:565–569 (1990).Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    J. S. Patton, H. J. Fuchs, and J. A. Moore. Pulmonary delivery of peptide and protein drugs. Proc. 17th Int. Symp. Control. Release Soc. 1990, p. 214.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    R. R. Burnette and B. Ongpipattanakul. Characterization of the permselective properties of excised human skin during iontophoresis. J. Pharm. Sci. 76:765–773 (1987).Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    D. H. Smyth and E. M. Wright. Streaming potentials in the rat small intestine. J Physiol. (London) 182:591–602 (1966).Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    G. Shutten, H. W. Spier, and G. Schwarz. Handbuch Der Hautund Geschlechtskrankheiten, Vol. I/4B, Springer, Berlin, 1981, pp. 113–147.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    A. M. Tonjum. Permeability of horseradish peroxidase in rabbit corneal epithelium. Acta Ophthalmol. 52:650–658 (1974).Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Y. Maitani, M. Yoshiharu, and T. Nagai. Influence of molecular weight and charge on nasal absorption of dextran and DEAE-dextran in rabbits. Int. J. Pharm. 49:23–27 (1989).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yongyut Rojanasakul
    • 1
  • Li-Ying Wang
    • 1
  • Meenakshi Bhat
    • 1
  • Douglas D. Glover
    • 1
  • Carl J. Malanga
    • 1
  • Joseph K. H. Ma
    • 1
  1. 1.School of PharmacyWest Virginia UniversityMorgantown

Personalised recommendations