Plant and Soil

, Volume 240, Issue 2, pp 311–319 | Cite as

Arsenic uptake and accumulation in rice (Oryza sativa L.) irrigated with contaminated water

  • Md. Joinal Abedin
  • J. Cotter-Howells
  • Andy A. Meharg


Long-term use of arsenic contaminated groundwater to irrigate crops, especially paddy rice (Oryza sativaL.) has resulted in elevated soil arsenic levels in Bangladesh. There is, therefore, concern regarding accumulation of arsenic in rice grown on these soils. A greenhouse pot experiment was conducted to evaluate the impact of arsenic-contaminated irrigation water on the growth and uptake of arsenic into rice grain, husk, straw and root. There were altogether 10 treatments which were a combination of five arsenate irrigation water concentrations (0–8 mg As l−1) and two soil phosphate amendments. Use of arsenate containing irrigation water reduced plant height, decreased rice yield and affected development of root growth. Arsenic concentrations in all plant parts increased with increasing arsenate concentration in irrigation water. However, arsenic concentration in rice grain did not exceed the maximum permissible limit of 1.0 mg As kg−1. Arsenic accumulation in rice straw at very high levels indicates that feeding cattle with such contaminated straw could be a direct threat for their health and also, indirectly, to human health via presumably contaminated bovine meat and milk. Phosphate application neither showed any significant difference in plant growth and development, nor in As concentrations in plant parts.

arsenic concentrations irrigation water rice soil 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Abedin M J, Cresser M S, Feldmann J and Meharg A A, Feldmann J and Cotter-Howells J 2002 Uptake kinetics of arsenic species in rice (Oryza sativa L.) plants. Plant Physiol. 128, 1120-1128.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Alam M B and Sattar M A 2000 Assessment of arsenic contamination in soils and waters in some areas of Bangladesh. Water Sci. Tech. 42, 185-193.Google Scholar
  3. Asher C J and Reay P F 1979 Arsenic uptake by barley seedlings. Aust. J. Plant Physiol. 6, 459-466.Google Scholar
  4. BGS (British Geological Survey) 2000 Executive summary of the main report of Phase I, Groundwater Studies of Arsenic Contamination in Bangladesh, by British Geological Survey and Mott MacDonald (UK) for the Government of Bangladesh, Ministry of Local Government, Rural Development and Cooperatives, Department of Public Health Engineering, and Department for International Development (UK). (URL: ticle/DFID-sum.html).Google Scholar
  5. Carbonell-Barrachina A A, Arabi M A, DeLaune R D, Gambrell R P and Patrick W H Jr 1998 The influence of arsenic chemical form and concentration on Spartina petens and Spartina alterniflora growth and tissue arsenic concentration. Plant Soil 198, 33-43.Google Scholar
  6. Carbonell-Barrachina A A, Burlo F, Valero D, Lopez E, Martinez-Romero D and Martinez-Sanchez F 1999 Arsenic toxicity and accumulation in turnip as affected by arsenic chemical speciation. J. Agric. Food Chem. 47, 2288-2294.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Creger T L and Peryea F J 1994 Phosphate fertilizer enhances arsenic uptake by Apricot Liners grown in lead-arsenate-enriched soil. Hort. Sci. 29, 88-92.Google Scholar
  8. Cullen W R and Reimer K J 1989 Arsenic speciation in the environment. Chem. Rev. 89, 713-764Google Scholar
  9. Davenport J R and Peryea F J 1991 Phosphate fertilizers influence leaching of lead and arsenic in a soil contaminated with lead arsenate. Water Air Soil Pollut. 57-58, 101-110.Google Scholar
  10. Dey M M, Miah M N I, Mustafi B A A and Hossain M 1996 Rice production constraints in Bangladesh: Implications for further research priorities. In Rice research in Asia: Progress and priorities. Eds. RE Evenson, R W Herdt and M Hossain. pp 179-191. CAB International, Wallingford, UK and International Rice Research Institute, Manila, Philippines.Google Scholar
  11. Feldmann J, John K and Pengprecha P 2000 Arsenic metabolism in seaweed-eating sheep from Northern Scotland. Fresenius J. Anal. Chem. 368, 116-121.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Feldmann J, Balger T, Hansen H and Pengprecha P 2001 In Plasma Mass Spectrometry: The New Millenium. Eds. J G Holland and S D Tanner. pp 380-386. The Royal Society of Chemistry, Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar
  13. Frans R, Horton D and Burdette L 1988 Influence of MSMA on straighthead, arsenic uptake and growth response in rice (Oryza sativa). Arkansas AES.Rep. Ser. 302, 1-12.Google Scholar
  14. Gilmour J T and Wells B R 1980 Residual effect of MSMA on sterility in rice cultivars. Agron. J. 72, 1066-1067.Google Scholar
  15. Hartley-Whitaker J, Ainsworth G, Vooijs R, Bookum T W, Schat H and Meharg A A 2000 Phytochelatins are involved in differential arsenate tolerance in Holcus lanatus. Plant Physiol. 126, 299-306.Google Scholar
  16. Hartley-Whitaker J, Ainsworth G and Meharg A A 2001 Copperand arsenate-induced oxidative stress in Holcus lanatus L. clones with differential sensitivity. Plant Cell Environ. 24, 713-722.Google Scholar
  17. Hingston F J, Posner A M and Quirk J P 1972 Competitive adsorption of negatively charged ligands on oxide surfaces. Faraday Discuss. Chem. Soc. 52, 334-342.Google Scholar
  18. Lee R B 1982 Selectivity of kinetics of ion uptake by barley plants following nutrient deficiency. Ann. Bot. 50, 429-449.Google Scholar
  19. Lindsay W L and Norvell W A 1978 Development of a DTPA soil test for zinc, iron, manganese, and copper. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 42, 421-428.Google Scholar
  20. Liu G L and Gao S D 1987 The effect of arsenic in red soil on crops. J. Soil Sci. (China) 18, 231-233.Google Scholar
  21. Maitani T, Kubota H, Sato K and Yamada T 1996 The composition of metals bound to class III metallothioein (phytochelatin and its desglycyl peptide) induced by various metals in root cultures of Rubia tinctorum. Plant Physiol. 110, 1145-1150.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Marin A R, Masscheleyn P H and Patrick W H Jr 1992 The influence of chemical form and concentration of arsenic on rice growth and tissue arsenic concentration. Plant Soil 139, 175-183.Google Scholar
  23. Marin A R, Pezeshki S R, Masscheleyn P H and Choi H S 1993a Effect of dymethylarsenic acid (DMAA) on growth, tissue arsenic, and photosynthesis of rice plants. J. Plant Nutr. 16, 865-880.Google Scholar
  24. Marin A R, Masscheleyn P H and Patrick W H Jr 1993b Soil redoxpH stability of arsenic species and its influence on arsenic uptake by rice. Plant Soil 152, 245-253.Google Scholar
  25. Masscheleyn P H, DeLaune R D and Patrick W H Jr 1991 Effect of redox potential and pH on arsenic speciation and solubility in a contaminated soil. Environ. Sci. Technol. 25, 1414-1419.Google Scholar
  26. Meharg A A and Macnair M R 1992 Suppression of the high affinity phosphate uptake system: a mechanism of arsenate tolerance in Holcus lanatus L. J Exp. Bot. 43, 519-524.Google Scholar
  27. Meharg A A and Macnair M R 1994 Relationship between plant phosphorus status and kinetics of arsenate influx in clones of Deschampsia caspitosa (L.) Beauv. that differ in their tolerance to arsenate. Plant Soil 162, 99-106.Google Scholar
  28. Meharg A A, Naylor J and Macnair M R 1994 Phosphorus nutrition of arsenate-tolerant and nontolerant phenotypes of velvetgrass. J Environ. Qual. 23, 234-238.Google Scholar
  29. Merry R H, Tiller K G and Alston A M 1986 The effects of contamination of soil with copper, lead and arsenic on the growth and composition of plants I. Effects of season, genotype, soil temperature and fertilizers. Plant Soil 91, 115-128.Google Scholar
  30. Milam M R, Marin A, Sedberry J E Jr, Bligh D P and Sheppard R 1988 Effect of water managenent, arsenic, and zinc on selected agronomic traits and rice grain yield. In Annual Progress Report, pp 105-108. Northeast Research Station and Macon Ridge Research Station, Baton Rouge, USA.Google Scholar
  31. Mylona P V, Polidoros A N and Scandalios J G 1998 Modulation of antioxidant responses by arsenic in maize. Free Radical Biol. Med. 25, 576-585.Google Scholar
  32. National Food Authority 1993 'Australian Food Standard Code: March, 1993'. Australian Govt. Pub. Service, Canberra.Google Scholar
  33. Nicholson F A, Chambers B J, Williams J R and Unwin R J 1999 Heavy metal contents of livestock feeds and animal manures in England and Wales. Bioresour. Technol. 70, 23-31.Google Scholar
  34. Nissen P and Benson A A 1982 Arsenic metabolism in fresh tion of arsenic by phytochelatins in plants. Plant Physiol. 122, 793-801 (water and terrestrial plants. Physiol. Plantarum. 54, 446-450).Google Scholar
  35. Onken B M and Hossner L R 1995 Plant uptake and determination of arsenic species in soil solution under flooded conditions. J. Environ. Qual. 24, 373-381.Google Scholar
  36. Onken B M and Hossner L R 1996 Determination of arsenic species in soil solution under flooded conditions. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 60, 1385-1392.Google Scholar
  37. Page A L, Miller R H and Keeney D R 1982. In Methods of Soil Analysis Part 2: Chemical and Microbiological properties (2nd edn.), SSSA, Madison, WI.Google Scholar
  38. Peryea F J and Kammereck R 1997 Phosphate-enhanced movement of arsenic out of lead arsenate-contaminated topsoil and through uncontaminated sub soil. Water Air Soil Pollut. 93, 243-254.Google Scholar
  39. Samanta G, Chowdhury T R, Mandal B K, Biswas B K, Chowdhury U K, Basu G K, Chanda C R, Lodh D and Chakraborti D 1999 Flow injection hydride generation atomic absorption spectrometry for determination of arsenic in water and biological samples from arsenic-affected districts of West Bengal, India and Bangladesh. Microchem. J. 62, 174-191.Google Scholar
  40. Schmöger M E V, Oven M and Grill E 2000 Detoxification of arsenic by phytochelatins in plants. Plant Physiol. 122, 793-801.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Shariatpanahi M and Anderson A C 1984 Distribution and toxicity of monosodium methanearsonate following oral administration of the herbicide to dairy sheep and goats. J. Environ. Sci. Health B19, 427-439.Google Scholar
  42. Sharples J M, Meharg A A, Chambers S M and Cairney J W G 2000 Mechanism of arsenate resistance in the Ericoid mycorrhizal fungus Hymenoscyphus ericae. Plant Physiol. 124, 1327-1334.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Sneller E F C, Van Heerwaarden L M, Kraaijeveld-Smit F J L, Ten Bookum W M, Koevoets P L M, Schat H and Verkleij J A C 1999 Toxicity of arsenate in Silene vulgaris, accumulation and degradation of arsenate-induced phytochelatins. New Phytol. 144, 223-232.Google Scholar
  44. SOES (School of Environmental Studies) and DCH (Dhaka Community Hospital) 2000 Groundwater arsenic contamination in Bangladesh A. Summary of 239 days field survey from August 1995 to February, 2000; B. Twenty seven days detailed field survey information from April 1999 to February 2000. School of Environmental Studies, Jadavpur University, Calcutta, India and Dhaka Community Hospital, Dhaka, Bangladesh.Google Scholar
  45. Tang T and Miller D M 1991 Growth and tissue composition of rice grown in soil treated with inorganic copper, nickel, and arsenic. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 22, 2037-2045.Google Scholar
  46. Tondel M, Rahman M, Magnuson A, Chowdhury I A, Faruquee M H and Ahmad S A 1999 The relationship of arsenic levels in drinking water and the prevalence rate of skin lesions in Bangladesh. Environ. Health Persp. 107, 727-729.Google Scholar
  47. Tsutsumi M 1980 Intensification of arsenic toxicity to paddy rice by hydrogen sulphide and ferrous iron I. Induction of bronzing and iron accumulation in rice by arsenic. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 26, 561-569.Google Scholar
  48. Ullah S M 1998 Arsenic contamination of groundwater and irrigated soils of Bangladesh. In Abstracts: International Conference on Arsenic Pollution of Ground Water in Bangladesh: causes, effects and remedies. 8-12 February 1998, Dhaka Community Hospital, Dhaka, Bangladesh, p 133.Google Scholar
  49. Ullrich-Eberius C I, Sanz A and Novacky A J 1989 Evaluation of arsenate and vandate-associated changes of electrical membrane potential and phosphate transport in Lemna gibba GI. J. Exp. Bot. 40, 119-128.Google Scholar
  50. UNICEF 2001 Arsenic mitigation in Bangladesh. URL: http// Scholar
  51. Watanabe F S, and Olsen S R 1965 Test of an ascorbic acid method for determining phosphorus in water and NaHCO3 extracts from soil. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc. 29, 677-678.Google Scholar
  52. WHO 2001 Arsenic in Drinking water. URL: 210.html.Google Scholar
  53. Woolson E A, Axley J H and Kearney P C 1973 The chemistry and phytotoxicity of arsenic in soils: II. Effects of time and phosphorus. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc. 37, 254-259.Google Scholar
  54. Woolson E A 1977 Generation of alkylarsines from soil. Weed Sci. 25, 412-416.Google Scholar
  55. Xie Z and Huang C 1994 Relatioship between lead, zinc and arsenic contents and rice tillering in the soil rice system. J. Zhejiang Agril. Univ. (China) 20, 67-71.Google Scholar
  56. Xie Z M and Huang C Y 1998 Control of arsenic toxicity in rice plants grown on an arsenic-polluted paddy soil. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 29, 2471-2477.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Md. Joinal Abedin
    • 1
  • J. Cotter-Howells
    • 1
  • Andy A. Meharg
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Plant and Soil Science, Cruickshank BuildingUniversity of AberdeenAberdeenUK

Personalised recommendations