Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology

, Volume 30, Issue 4, pp 419–430 | Cite as

Deviant Peer Affiliations, Crime and Substance Use: A Fixed Effects Regression Analysis

  • David M. Fergusson
  • Nicola R. Swain-Campbell
  • L. John Horwood

Abstract

The present study was designed to assess the influence of deviant peer affiliations on crime and substance use in adolescence/young adulthood. Data were used from a 21-year longitudinal study of health, development, and adjustment of a birth cohort of 1,265 New Zealand children. Annual assessments of deviant peer affiliations were obtained for the period from age 14–21 years, together with measures of psychosocial outcomes including, violent crime, property crime, alcohol abuse, cannabis abuse, and nicotine dependence. Affiliating with deviant peers was found to be significantly associated with each of these outcomes (p < .0001). Statistical control for confounding by both fixed and time dynamic factors reduced the strength of association between deviant peer affiliations and outcome measures. Nevertheless, deviant peer affiliations remained significantly associated (p < .0001) with all outcomes. For violent/property crime, cannabis and alcohol abuse there was significant evidence of age-related variation in the strength of association with deviant peer affiliations, with deviant peer affiliations having greater influence on younger participants (14–15 years) than older participants (20–21 years). These results suggest that deviant peer affiliations are associated with increased rates of a range of adjustment problems in adolescence/young adulthood with deviant peer affiliations being most influential at younger ages.

deviant peers crime substance use fixed effects 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. American Psychiatric Association. (1987). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (3rd ed., Rev.). Washington, DC: Author.Google Scholar
  2. American Psychiatric Association. (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disordersy (4th ed). Washington, DC: Author.Google Scholar
  3. Ary, D. V., Duncan, T. E., Biglan, A., Metzler, C. W., Noell, J. W., & Smolkowski, K. (1999). Development of adolescent problem behavior. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 27, 141-150.Google Scholar
  4. Costanzo, P.R., & Shaw, M. E. (1966). Conformity as a function of age level. Child Development, 37, 967-975.Google Scholar
  5. Deater-Deckard, K. (2001). Annotation: Recent research examining the role of peer relationships in the development of psychopathology. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 42, 565-579.Google Scholar
  6. Dishion, T. J., Capaldi, D., Spracklen, K. M., & Li, F. (1995). Peer ecology of male adolescent drug use. Development and Psychopathology, 7, 803-824.Google Scholar
  7. Dishion, T. J., & Loeber, R. (1985). Adolescent marijuana and alcohol use: The role of parents and peers revisited. American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse, 11, 11-25.Google Scholar
  8. Dishion, T. J., Patterson, G. R., & Griesler, P. C. (1994). Peer adaptation in the development of antisocial behavior: A confluence model. In L. R. Huesmann (Ed.), Aggressive behavior: Current perspectives (pp. 61-95). New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
  9. Duncan, S. C., Duncan, T. E., Biglan, A., & Ary, D. (1998). Contributions of the social context of the development of adolescent substance use: A multivariate latent growth modeling approach. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 50, 57-71.Google Scholar
  10. Elliott, D. S., & Huizinga, D. (1989). Improving self-reported measures of delinquency. In M. W. Klein (Ed.), Cross-National Research in self-reported crime and delinquency (pp. 155-186). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publisher.Google Scholar
  11. Elliott, D. S., Huizinga, D., & Morse, B. J. (1985). The dynamics of delinquent behavior: A National Survey Progress Report. Boulder: Institute of Behavioral Sciences, University of Colorado.Google Scholar
  12. Erickson, K. G., Crosnoe, R., & Dornbusch, S. M. (2000). A social process model of adolescent deviance: Combining social control and differential association perspectives. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 29, 395-425.Google Scholar
  13. Farrington, D. P. (1995). The development of offending and antisocial behavior from childhood: Key findings from the Cambridge study in delinquent development. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 36, 929-964.Google Scholar
  14. Fergusson, D. M., & Horwood, L. J. (1996). The role of adolescent peer affiliations in the continuity between childhood behavioral adjustment and juvenile offending. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 24, 205-221.Google Scholar
  15. Fergusson, D. M., & Horwood, L. J. (1997). Early onset cannabis use and psychosocial adjustment in young adults. Addiction, 92, 279-296.Google Scholar
  16. Fergusson, D. M., & Horwood, L. J. (1999). Prospective childhood predictors of deviant peer affiliations in adolescence. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 40, 581-592.Google Scholar
  17. Fergusson, D. M., & Horwood, L. J. (2001). The Christchurch Health and Development Study: Review of findings on child and adolescent mental health. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 35, 287-296.Google Scholar
  18. Fergusson, D. M., & Horwood, L. J. (2002). Male and female offending trajectories. Development and Psychopathology, 14, 159-177.Google Scholar
  19. Fergusson, D. M., Horwood, L. J., Shannon, F. T., & Lawton, J. M. (1989). The Christchurch Child Development Study: A review of epidemiological findings. Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology, 3, 278-301.Google Scholar
  20. Fergusson, D. M., Woodward, L. J., & Horwood, L. J. (1999). Childhood peer relationship problems and young people's involvement with deviant peers in adolescence. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 27, 357-370.Google Scholar
  21. Fergusson, D. M., Woodward, L. J., & Horwood, L. J. (2000). Gender differences in the relationship between early conduct problems and later criminality and substance abuse. International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research, 8, 179-191.Google Scholar
  22. Hamerle, A., & Ronning, G. (1995). Panel analysis for qualitative variables. In G. Arminger, C. C. Clogg, & M. E. Sobel (Eds.), Handbook of statistical modeling for the social and behavioral sciences (pp. 401-451). New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
  23. Hausman, J., Hall, B. H., & Griliches, Z. (1984). Econometric models for count data with an application to the patents—R & D relationship. Econometrica, 52, 909-938.Google Scholar
  24. Hoge, R. D., Andrews, D. A., & Leschied, A. W. (1994). Tests of three hypotheses regarding the predictors of delinquency. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 22, 547-558.Google Scholar
  25. Judge, G. E., Griffiths, W. E., Hill, R. C., & Lee, T. (Eds.). (1980). The theory and practice of econometrics. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  26. Kandel, D., Davies, M., & Baydar, N. (1990). The creation of interpersonal contexts: Homophily in dyadic relationships in adolescence and young adulthood. In L. Robins & M. Rutter (Eds.), Straight and devious pathways from childhood to adolescence (pp. 221-241). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Keenan, K., & Shaw, D. (1997). Developmental and social influences on young girls' early problem behavior. Psychological Bulletin, 121, 95-113.Google Scholar
  28. Lewis, C. E., Seigel, J. M., & Lewis, M. A. (1984). Feeling bad: Exploring sources of distress among pre-adolescent children. American Journal of Public Health, 74, 117-122.Google Scholar
  29. Loeber, R. (1990). Development and risk factors of juvenile antisocial behavior and delinquency. Clinical Psychology Review, 10, 1-41.Google Scholar
  30. Mazerolle, P., Brame, R., Paternoster, R., Piquero, A., & Dean, C. (2000). Onset age, persistence, and offending versatility: Comparisons across gender. Criminology, 38, 1143-1172.Google Scholar
  31. Moffitt, T. E. (1993). Adolescence-limited and life-course-persistent antisocial behavior: A developmental taxonomy. Psychological Review, 100, 674-701.Google Scholar
  32. Moffitt, T. E., Caspi, A., Rutter, M., & Silva, P. A. (2001). Sex differences in antisocial behavior. Conduct disorder, delinquency, and violence in the Dunedin longitudinal study. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Moffitt, T. R., & Silva, P. A. (1988). Self-reported delinquency: Results from an instrument for New Zealand. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 21, 227-240.Google Scholar
  34. Rutter, M., & Smith, D. J. (1995). Psychosocial disorders in young people: Time trends and their causes. Chichester, UK: Wiley.Google Scholar
  35. Silverthorn, P., & Frick, P. J. (1999). Developmental pathways to antisocial behavior: The delayed-onset pathway in girls. Development and Psychopathology, 11, 101-126.Google Scholar
  36. StataCorp. (1999). Stata Statistical Software: Release 6.0. Texas: Stata Corporation, College Station.Google Scholar
  37. White, H. L., & Labouvie, E. W. (1989). Towards the assessment of adolescent problem drinking. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 50, 30-37.Google Scholar
  38. Woodward, L. J., & Fergusson, D. M. (1999). Childhood peer relationship problems and psychosocial adjustment in late adolescence. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 27, 87-104.Google Scholar
  39. Woodward, L. J., Fergusson, D. M., & Horwood, L. J. (2002). Deviant partner involvement and offending risk in early adulthood. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 43, 177-190.Google Scholar
  40. World Health Organization. (1993). Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI). Geneva: Author.Google Scholar
  41. Zoccolillo, M. (1993). Gender and the development of conduct disorder. Development and Psychopathology, 5, 65-78.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • David M. Fergusson
    • 1
  • Nicola R. Swain-Campbell
  • L. John Horwood
  1. 1.Christchurch Health and Development Study, Christchurch School of MedicineChristchurchNew Zealand

Personalised recommendations