Advertisement

Journal of Computational Neuroscience

, Volume 12, Issue 2, pp 97–122 | Cite as

Coarse-Grained Reduction and Analysis of a Network Model of Cortical Response: I. Drifting Grating Stimuli

  • Michael Shelley
  • David McLaughlin
Article

Abstract

We present a reduction of a large-scale network model of visual cortex developed by McLaughlin, Shapley, Shelley, and Wielaard. The reduction is from many integrate-and-fire neurons to a spatially coarse-grained system for firing rates of neuronal subpopulations. It accounts explicitly for spatially varying architecture, ordered cortical maps (such as orientation preference) that vary regularly across the cortical layer, and disordered cortical maps (such as spatial phase preference or stochastic input conductances) that may vary widely from cortical neuron to cortical neuron. The result of the reduction is a set of nonlinear spatiotemporal integral equations for “phase-averaged” firing rates of neuronal subpopulations across the model cortex, derived asymptotically from the full model without the addition of any extra phenomological constants. This reduced system is used to study the response of the model to drifting grating stimuli—where it is shown to be useful for numerical investigations that reproduce, at far less computational cost, the salient features of the point-neuron network and for analytical investigations that unveil cortical mechanisms behind the responses observed in the simulations of the large-scale computational model. For example, the reduced equations clearly show (1) phase averaging as the source of the time-invariance of cortico-cortical conductances, (2) the mechanisms in the model for higher firing rates and better orientation selectivity of simple cells which are near pinwheel centers, (3) the effects of the length-scales of cortico-cortical coupling, and (4) the role of noise in improving the contrast invariance of orientation selectivity.

visual cortex neuronal networks coarse-graining dynamics orientation selectivity analysis 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anderson J, Carandini M, Ferster D (2000) Orientation tuning of input conductance, excitation, and inhibition in cat primary visual cortex. J. Neurophysiol. 84: 909–926.Google Scholar
  2. Anderson J, Lampl I, Gillespie D, Ferster D (2000) The contribution of noise to contrast invariance of orientation tuning in cat visual cortex. Science 290: 1968–1972.Google Scholar
  3. Azouz R, Gray CM, Nowak LG, McCormick DA (1997) Physiological properties of inhibitory interneurons in cat striate cortex. Cereb. Cortex 7: 534–545.Google Scholar
  4. Benardete E, Kaplan E (1999) The dynamics of primate M retinal ganglion cells. Visual Neurosci. 16: 355–368.Google Scholar
  5. Ben-Yishai R, Bar-Or R, Sompolinsky H (1995) Theory of orientation tuning in the visual cortex. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 92: 3844–3848.Google Scholar
  6. Blasdel G (1992) Differential imaging of ocular dominance and orientation selectivity inmonkey striate cortex. J. Neurosci. 12: 3115–3138.Google Scholar
  7. Bonhoeffer T, Grinvald A (1991) Iso-orientation domains in cat visual cortex are arranged in pinwheel like patterns. Nature 353: 429–431.Google Scholar
  8. Borg-Graham L, Monier C, Fregnac Y (1998) Visual input evokes transient and strong shunting inhibition in visual cortical neurons. Nature 393: 369–373.Google Scholar
  9. Bressloff P, Coombes S (2000) Dynamics of strongly coupled spiking neurons. Neural Comput. 12: 91–129.Google Scholar
  10. Callaway E (1998) Local circuits in primary visual cortex of the macaque monkey. Ann. Rev. Neurosci. 21: 47–74.Google Scholar
  11. Callaway E, Wiser A (1996) Contributions of individual layer 2 to 5 spiny neurons to local circuits in macaque primary visual cortex. Visual Neurosci. 13: 907–922.Google Scholar
  12. Chance F, Nelson S, Abbott LF (1999) Complex cells as cortically amplified simple cells. Nature Neurosci. 2: 277–282.Google Scholar
  13. Das A, Gilbert C (1999) Topography of contextual modulations mediated by short-range interactions in primary visual cortex. Nature 399: 655–661.Google Scholar
  14. DeAngelis G, Ghose R, Ohzawa I, Freeman R (1999) Functional micro-organization of primary visual cortex: Receptive field analysis of nearby neurons. J. Neurosci. 19: 4046–4064.Google Scholar
  15. De Valois R, Albrecht D, Thorell L (1982) Spatial frequency selectivity of cells in macaque visual cortex. Vision Res. 22: 545–559.Google Scholar
  16. Ermentrout GB (1994) Reduction of conductance based models with slow synapses to neural networks. Neural Comput. 6: 679–695.Google Scholar
  17. Feller W (1968) An Introduction to Probability Theory and Its Applications. John Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
  18. Ferster D, Chung S, Wheat H (1996) Orientation selectivity of thalamic input to simple cells of cat visual cortex. Nature 380: 249–252.Google Scholar
  19. Fitzpatrick D, Lund J, Blasdel G (1985) Intrinsic connections of macaque striate cortexAfferent and efferent connections of lamina 4C. J. Neurosci. 5: 3329–3349.Google Scholar
  20. Gerstner W (1995) Time structure of the activity in neural network models. Phys. Rev. E 51: 738–758.Google Scholar
  21. Gibson J, Beierlein M, Connors B (1999) Two networks of electrically coupled inhibitory neurons in neocortex. Nature 402: 75–79.Google Scholar
  22. Hansel D, Sompolinsky H (1998) Modeling Feature Selectivity in Local Cortical Circuits. MIT Press, Boston, MA. pp. 499–567.Google Scholar
  23. Hirsch J, Alonso JM, Reid R, Martinez L (1998) Synaptic integration in striate cortical simple cells. J. Neurosci. 15: 9517–9528.Google Scholar
  24. Jagadeesh B, Wheat H, Kontsevich L, Tyler C, Ferster D (1997) Direction selectivity of synaptic potentials in simple cells of the cat visual cortex. J. Neurophysiol. 78: 2772–2789.Google Scholar
  25. Knight B, Manin D, Sirovich L (1996) Dynamical models of interacting neuron populations. In: Gerf E, ed. Symposium on Robotics and Cybernetics: Computational Engineering in Systems Applications. Cite Scientifique, Lille, France.Google Scholar
  26. Laing C, Chow C (2001) Stationary bumps in networks of spiking neurons. Neural Comput. 13: 1473–1494.Google Scholar
  27. Lund JS (1987) Local circuit neurons of macaque monkey striate cortex: Neurons of laminae 4C and 5A. J. Comp. Neurology 257: 60–92.Google Scholar
  28. Maldonado P, Godecke I, Gray C, Bonhoeffer T (1997) Orientation selectivity in pinwheel centers in cat striate cortex. Science 276: 1551–1555.Google Scholar
  29. McLaughlin D, Kovacic G (2001) Private communication.Google Scholar
  30. McLaughlin D, Shapley R, Shelley M, Wielaard J (2000) A neuronal network model of macaque primary visual cortex (V1): Orientation selectivity and dynamics in the input layer 4Cα. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97: 8087–8092.Google Scholar
  31. Nykamp D, Tranchina D (2000) A population density method that facilitates large-scale modeling of neural networks: Analysis and application to orientation tuning. J. Comput. Neurosci. 8: 19–50.Google Scholar
  32. Nykamp D, Tranchina D (2001) A population density method that facilitates large-scale modeling of neural networks: Extension to slow inhibitory synapses. Neural Comput. 13: 511–546.Google Scholar
  33. Palmer L, Davis T (1981) Receptive-field structure in cat striate cortex. J. Neurophysiol. 46: 260–276.Google Scholar
  34. Pugh M, Ringach D, Shapley R, Shelley M (2000) Computational modeling of orientation tuning dynamics in V1 neurons. J. Comp. Neurosci. 8: 143–159.Google Scholar
  35. Reid RC, Alonso JM (1995) Specificity of monosynaptic connections from thalamus to visual cortex. Nature 378: 281–284.Google Scholar
  36. Ringach D, Hawken M, Shapley R (1997) Dynamics of orientation tuning in macaque primary visual cortex. Nature 387: 281–284.Google Scholar
  37. Ringach D, Shapley R, Hawken M (2001) Diversity and laminar dependence of orientation selectivity in simple and complex cells of macaque v1. J. Neurosci. 21(14).Google Scholar
  38. Sclar G, Freeman R (1982) Orientation selectivity in the cat's striate cortex is invariant with stimulus contrast. Exp. Brain Res. 46: 457–461.Google Scholar
  39. Shapley R, Reid C (1998) Private communication.Google Scholar
  40. Shelley M, McLaughlin D, Cai D (2001) Point neuron and mean firing rate models of primary visual cortex.Google Scholar
  41. Shelley M, McLaughlin D, Shapley R, Wielaard J (2001) The high conductance state caused by visual stimulation in a large-scale computational model of the visual cortex: An emergent separation of time scales.Google Scholar
  42. Somers D, Nelson S, Sur M (1995) An emergent model of orientation selectivity in cat visual cortical simple cells. J. Neurosci. 15: 5448–5465.Google Scholar
  43. Sompolinsky H, Shapley R (1997) New perspectives on the mechanisms for orientation selectivity. Current Opinion in Neurobiol. 7: 514–522.Google Scholar
  44. Tolhurst D, Dean A (1990) The effects of contrast on the linearity of spatial summation of simple cells in the cat's striate cortex. Exp. Brain Res. 79: 582–588.Google Scholar
  45. Treves A (1993) Mean field analysis of neuronal spike dynamics. Network 4: 259–284.Google Scholar
  46. Troyer T, Krukowski A, Priebe N, Miller K (1998) Contrast invariant orientation tuning in cat visual cortex with feedforward tuning and correlation based intracortical connectivity. J. Neurosci. 18: 5908–5927.Google Scholar
  47. Wielaard J, Shelley M, Shapley R, McLaughlin D (2001) Howsimple cells are made in a nonlinear network model of the visual cortex. J. Neurosci. 21(14): 5203–5211.Google Scholar
  48. Wilson H, Cowan J (1973) A mathematical theory of the functional dynamics of cortical and thalamic nervous tissue. Kybernetik 13: 55–80.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michael Shelley
    • 1
  • David McLaughlin
    • 1
  1. 1.Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences and Center for Neural ScienceNew York UniversityNew York

Personalised recommendations