Social Indicators Research

, Volume 58, Issue 1–3, pp 403–428

Considering Social Cohesion in Quality of Life Assessments: Concept and Measurement

  • Regina Berger-Schmitt
Article

Abstract

In recent years, the concept of social cohesionhas received great attention in scientificresearch as well as in politics. It representsa central policy goal at the national and thesupranational level as declared for example bymany policy documents of the European Union.The present paper integrates social cohesioninto the components of quality of life anddistinguishes two essential goal dimensionsinherent in the concept: the inequalitydimension and the social capital dimension. Thefirst dimension incorporates the goals ofreducing disparities, promoting equalopportunities and combating social exclusion,while the second dimension deals with allaspects aiming at strengthening socialrelations, interactions and ties. A proposal ismade on how to measure this conceptualisationof social cohesion within the framework of aEuropean System of Social Indicators, and someexamples of indicators of social cohesion inEurope are discussed.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. Berger-Schmitt, R. and H.-H. Noll: 2000, ‘Conceptual framework and structure of a European system of social indicators’, EuReporting Working Paper No. 9 (Centre for Survey Research and Methodology (ZUMA), Social Indicators Department, Mannheim).Google Scholar
  2. Berkman, L. and S.L. Syme: 1979, ‘Social networks, host resistance and mortality: A nine-year follow-up study of Alameda county residents’, American Journal of Epidemiology 109(2), pp. 186-204.Google Scholar
  3. Bernard, P.: 1999, ‘Social cohesion: A critique’, CPRN Discussion Paper No. F09 (Canadian Policy Research Networks, Ottawa).Google Scholar
  4. Coleman, J.: 1988, ‘Social capital in the creation of human capital’, American Journal of Sociology 94, pp. 95-120.Google Scholar
  5. Council of Europe, Committee of Ministers: 2000, ‘European Committee for Social Cohesion (CDCS)–Strategy for Social Cohesion’, CM Documents CM(2000)92addrev (http://cm.coe.int/reports/cmdocs/2000/2000cm92addrev.htm).Google Scholar
  6. Council of Europe, DG III-Social Cohesion: 2000, ‘Social cohesion: Developments’, Newsletter No. 1 (http://www.social.coe.int/en/cohesion/strategy/Unit/ bule1.pdf).Google Scholar
  7. Dahrendorf, R. et al.: 1995, ‘Report on wealth creation and social cohesion in a free society’ (London).Google Scholar
  8. European Commission: 1993, ‘White paper. Growth, competitiveness and employment’, COM(93)700 (Office for Official Publication of the European Communities, Luxembourg).Google Scholar
  9. European Commission: 1996, ‘First cohesion report 1996’ (Office for Official Publication of the European Communities, Luxembourg, http://www.inforegio.org/wbdoc/docoffic/official/repcoh/repco_en.htm).Google Scholar
  10. European Commission: 1997, ‘Agenda 2000–Volume I–communication: For a stronger and wider union’, COM(97)2000 (Strasbourg, http://europa.eu.int/ comm/dg1a/dwn/agenda2000/strong/strong-en.pdf).Google Scholar
  11. European Commission: 1998, ‘Social action programme 1998–2000’, COM(98)259 (Brussels, http://europa.eu.int/en/comm/dg05/news/sapen.htm).Google Scholar
  12. European Commission: 2000a, ‘Building an inclusive Europe’, COM(2000) 79 final (Brussels).Google Scholar
  13. European Commission: 2000b, ‘Equal opportunities for women and men in the European union–1999. Annual Report from the Commission’, COM(2000)123 final (Brussels, http://europa.eu.int/comm/employment_social/ equ_opp/report_en.html).Google Scholar
  14. European Commission: 2000c, ‘European social statistics: Income, poverty and social exclusion’ (Luxembourg).Google Scholar
  15. European Council: 2000a, ‘Presidency conclusions. Lisbon European Council 23 and 24 March 2000’ (http://europa.eu.int/council/off/conclu/mar2000/ mar2000_en.pdf).Google Scholar
  16. European Council: 2000b, ‘Presidency conclusions. Nice European Council meeting 7, 8 and 9’ (http://europa.eu.int/council/off/conclu/dec2000/dec2000 _en.pdf).Google Scholar
  17. Gore, C. and J.B. Figueiredo: 1997, ‘Social exclusion and anti-poverty policy: A debate’, International Institute for Labour Studies, Research Series No. 110 (Geneva).Google Scholar
  18. Grootaert, Ch.: 1998, ‘Social capital: The missing link’, Social Capital Initiative Working Paper No. 3, (World Bank, Washington, D.C., http://www.worldbank.org/poverty/scapital/wkrppr/index.htm).Google Scholar
  19. Haan, A. de: 1999, ‘Social exclusion: Towards a holistic understanding of deprivation’, Deutsche Stiftung für internationale Entwicklung (DSE), Villa Borsig Workshop Series (Berlin, http://www.dse.de/ef/poverty/dehaan.htm).Google Scholar
  20. Hjerppe, R.: 1999, ‘Social capital and economic growth’, in R. Wiman and T. Partonen (eds.), Putting People at the Center of Sustainable Development.Proceedings of the Expert Meeting on the Social Dimension in Sustainable Development. Volume 2: Contributed Papers (National Research and Development Centre for Welfare and Health (STAKES) and Ministry of Social Affairs and Health, Helsinki, pp. 87-105).Google Scholar
  21. Immerfall, S.: 1999, ‘Sozialkapital in der Bundesrepublik. Thesen zu Konzept und Größenordnung’, in E. Kistler, H.-H. Noll and E. Priller (eds.), Perspektiven gesellschaftlichen Zusammenhalts. Empirische Befunde, Praxiserfahrungen, Meßkonzepte (Ed. Sigma Bohn, Berlin, pp. 121-128).Google Scholar
  22. International Institute for Labour Studies (IILS): 1998, ‘Social exclusion and anti-poverty strategies’. Research Project on the Patterns and Causes of Social Exclusion and the Design of Policies to Promote Integration: A Synthesis of Findings, second edition (Geneva).Google Scholar
  23. Jeannotte, S.: 1997, ‘Social cohesion research workplan’, Department of Canadian Heritage, Strategic Research and Analysis, SRA-266 (Hull, http:// policyresearch.schoolnet.ca/networks/cohsoc/socialpapers-e.htm#Canadian Heritage).Google Scholar
  24. Jeannotte, S.: 2000, ‘Social cohesion around the world: An international comparison of definitions and issues’, Department of Canadian Heritage, Strategic Research and Analysis, SRA-309 (Hull, http://policyresearch.schoolnet.ca/ networks/cohsoc/socialpapers-e.htm#CanadianHeritage).Google Scholar
  25. Jenson, J.: 1998a, ‘Mapping social cohesion: The state of Canadian research’, Canadian Policy Research Networks, CPRN Study No. F 03 (Ottawa, ftp:// ftp.cprn.org/family/msc2_e.pdf).Google Scholar
  26. Jenson, J.: 1998b, ‘Mapping social cohesion’, Backgrounder Speech Presented at the Policy Research Secretariat's Conference ‘Policy Research: Creating Linkages’, October 1, 1998, Canadian Policy Research Networks (CPRN), Ottawa.Google Scholar
  27. Kawachi, I., B.I. Kennedy and K. Lochner: 1997, ‘Long live community: Social capital as public health’, The American Prospect 35, pp. 56-59 (http:// www.prospect.org/archives/35/35kawafs.html).Google Scholar
  28. Knack, S.: 2000, ‘Trust, associational life and economic performance in the OECD’, Paper presented at the Symposium on the Contribution of Human and Social Capital to Sustained Economic Growth and Well-Being, organised by the OECD and Human Resources Development Canada (HRDC) in Quebec, March 19–21, 2000 (http://www.oecd.org/cer/obj1/docs.htm).Google Scholar
  29. Knack, S. and P. Keefer: 1997, ‘Does social capital have an economic payoff? A cross-country investigation’, Quarterly Journal of Economics 112, pp. 1251-1288.Google Scholar
  30. Maxwell, J.: 1996, ‘Social dimensions of economic growth’, Eric John Hanson Memorial Lecture Series, Vol. VIII (University of Alberta, Alberta).Google Scholar
  31. McCracken, M.: 1998, ‘Social cohesion and macroeconomic performance’, Paper presented at the, Conference ‘The State of Living Standards and the Quality of Life’, Centre for the Study of Living Standards (CSLS), October 30–31, 1998, Ottawa, Ontario/Canada.Google Scholar
  32. Mejer, L.: 2000, ‘Social exclusion in the EU member states’, in European Commission and Eurostat (eds.), Statistics in Focus 1.Google Scholar
  33. Mejer, L. and J. Schiepers: 2000, ‘Social exclusion indicators. Progress of work’.Paper presented at the Brainstorming on Social Indicators, Council of Europe, 14–15 September 2000, Strasbourg.Google Scholar
  34. Narayan, D.: 1999, ‘Bonds and bridges: Social capital and poverty’ (World Bank, Poverty Group, Washington, D.C., http://www.worldbank.org/poverty/ scapital/library/narayan.htm).Google Scholar
  35. Narayan; D. and L. Pritchett: 1997, ‘Cents and sociability: Household income and social capital in rural Tanzania’, Policy Research Working Paper 1796 (World Bank, Washington, D.C., http://www.worldbank.org/html/dec/Publications/ Workpapers/WPS1700series/wps1796/wps1796-abstract.html).Google Scholar
  36. O' Connor, P.: 1998, ‘Mapping social cohesion’, Canadian Policy Research Networks, CPRN Discussion Paper No. F 01 (Ottawa, ftp://ftp.cprn.org/ family/msc_e.pdf).Google Scholar
  37. Policy Research Committee, Government of Canada: 1999, ‘Sustaining growth, human development, and social cohesion in a global world’. A Report Prepared for the Policy Research Initiative (http://www.schoolnet.ca/pri-prp/ keydocs/sustain99/index-e.htm).Google Scholar
  38. Putnam, R.: 1993, ‘The prosperous community–Social capital and public life’, American Prospect 13, pp. 35-42.Google Scholar
  39. Putnam, R.: 2000, ‘Social capital: Measurement and consequences’. Paper presented at the Symposium on the Contribution of Human and Social Capital to Sustained Economic Growth and Well-Being, organised by the OECD and Human Resources Development Canada (HRDC) in Quebec, March 19–21, 2000 (http://www.oecd.org/cer/obj1/docs.htm).Google Scholar
  40. Ritzen, J., W. Easterly and M. Woolcock: 2000, ‘On “Good” Politicians and “Bad” Policies: Social Cohesion, Institutions, and Growth’, Policy Research Working Paper 2448 (World Bank, Washington D.C.).Google Scholar
  41. Rodgers, G., C. Gore and F.B. Figueiredo: 1995, ‘Social exclusion: Rhetoric, reality, responses’ (International Labour Office, Geneva).Google Scholar
  42. Room, G.: 1995, ‘Poverty and social exclusion: the new European agenda for policy and research’, in G. Room (ed.), Beyond the Threshold. The Measurement and Analysis of Social Exclusion (The Policy Press, Bristol, pp. 1-9).Google Scholar
  43. Room, G.: 1998, ‘Social quality in Europe: Perspectives on social exclusion’, in W. Beck, L. van der Maesen and A. Walker (eds.), The Social Quality of Europe (The Policy Press, Bristol, pp. 289-297).Google Scholar
  44. Rose, R.: 1995, ‘Russia as an hour-glass society: A constitution without citizens’, East European Constitutional Review 4(3), pp. 34-42.Google Scholar
  45. Silver, H.: 1994, ‘Social exclusion and social solidarity: Three paradigms’, International Institute for Labour Studies (IILS), Discussion Papers Series No. 69 (Geneva).Google Scholar
  46. Social Capital Initiative (SCI), World Bank: 1998, ‘The initiative on defining, monitoring and measuring social capital. Overview and program description’, Social Capital Initiative Working Paper 1 (Washington, D.C., http://www.worldbank.org/poverty/scapital/wkrppr/index.htm).Google Scholar
  47. Temple, J.: 2000, ‘Growth effects of education and social capital in the OECD’, Paper presented at the Symposium on the Contribution of Human and Social Capital to Sustained Economic Growth and Well-Being, organised by the OECD and Human Resources Development Canada (HRDC) in Quebec, March 19–21, 2000 (http://www.oecd.org/cer/obj1/docs.htm)Google Scholar
  48. Veenhoven, R.: 1996, ‘Happy life-expectancy. A comprehensive measure of quality-of-life in nations’, Social Indicators Research 39, pp. 1-58.Google Scholar
  49. Veenhoven, R.: 2000, ‘The four qualities of life. Ordering concepts and measures of the good life’, Journal of Happiness Studies 1, pp. 1-39.Google Scholar
  50. Woolcock, M.: 2000, ‘The place of social capital in understanding social and economic outcomes’, Paper presented at the Symposium on the Contribution of Human and Social Capital to Sustained Economic Growth and Well-Being, organised by the OECD and Human Resources Development Canada (HRDC) in Quebec, March 19–21, 2000 (http://www.oecd.org/cer/obj1/docs.htm).Google Scholar
  51. Woolley, F.: 1998, ‘Social cohesion and voluntary activity: Making connections’, Paper presented at the, Conference ‘The State of Living Standards and the Quality of Life’, Centre for the Study of Living Standards (CSLS), October 30–31, 1998, Ottawa, Ontario/Canada.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Regina Berger-Schmitt
    • 1
  1. 1.Social Indicators DepartmentCentre for Survey Research and Methodology (ZUMA)MannheimGermany

Personalised recommendations