Additional Evidence on the Association Between Director Stock Ownership and Incentive Compensation

  • Chih-Ying Chen

Abstract

Governance scholars argue that outside directors have little incentive to monitor managers when their equity stake in the firm is not significant. A sample with a substantial level of outside director shareholdings is examined and a negative relationship between incentive compensation and outside director stock ownership is found. While firms pay higher incentive compensation when they have greater investment opportunities, the compensation contains excess pay due to ineffective corporate governance. Overall, the results suggest more effective corporate governance and lower incentive compensation when outside director stock ownership is higher.

incentive compensation investment opportunities corporate governance agency cost director ownership 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Baber, W., S. Janakiraman and S. Kang, “Investment Opportunities and the Structure of Executive Compensation.” Journal of Accounting and Economics 21, 297-318, (1996).Google Scholar
  2. Belsley, D., E. Kuh and R. Welsch, Regression and Diagnostics, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 1980.Google Scholar
  3. Bryan, S., L. Hwang and S. Lilien, “CEO Stock-Based Compensation: An Empirical Analysis of Incentive-Intensity, Relative Mix, and Economic Determinants.” Journal of Business 73(4), 661-693, (2000).Google Scholar
  4. Core, J. and W. Guay, “The Use of Equity Grants to Manage Optimal Equity Incentive Levels.” Journal of Accounting and Economics 28, 151-184, (1999).Google Scholar
  5. Core, J., R. Holthausen and D. Larcker, “Corporate Governance, Chief Executive Officer Compensation, and Firm Performance.” Journal of Financial Economics 51, 371-406, (1999).Google Scholar
  6. Eisenhardt, K., “Agency Theory: An Assessment and Review.” Academy of Management Review 14(1), 57-74, (1989).Google Scholar
  7. Fama, E. and M. Jensen, “Separation of Ownership and Control.” Journal of Law and Economics 26, 301-325, (1983).Google Scholar
  8. Finkelstein, S. and D. Hambrick, “Chief Executive Compensation: A Study of the Intersection of Markets and Political Processes.” Strategic Management Journal 10, 121-134, (1989).Google Scholar
  9. Gaver, J. and K. Gaver, “Additional Evidence on the Association between the Investment Opportunity Set and Corporate Financing, Dividend, and Compensation Policies.” Journal of Accounting and Economics 16, 125-160, (1993).Google Scholar
  10. Hambrick, D. and E. Jackson, “Outside Directors with a Stake: The Linchpin in Improving Governance.” California Management Review 42(4), 108-127, (2000).Google Scholar
  11. Hayward, M. and D. Hambrick, “Explaining the Premiums Paid for Large Acquisition: Evidence of CEO Hubris.” Administrative Science Quarterly 42, 103-127, (1997).Google Scholar
  12. Jensen, M., “Eclipse of the Public Corporation.” Harvard Business Review 67(5), 61-75, (1989).Google Scholar
  13. Jensen, M., “The Modern Industrial Revolution, Exit and the Failure of Internal Control Systems.” Journal of Finance 48, 831-880, (1993).Google Scholar
  14. Kallapur, S. and M. Trombley, “The Association between Investment Opportunity Set Proxies and Realized Growth.” Journal of Business Finance & Accounting 26, 505-519, (1999).Google Scholar
  15. Lambert, R., D. Larcker and K. Weigelt, “The Structure of Organizational Incentives.” Administrative Science Quarterly 38, 438-461, (1993).Google Scholar
  16. Lewellen, W., C. Loderer and K. Martin, “Executive Compensation Contracts and Executive Inventive Problems: An Empirical Analysis.” Journal of Accounting and Economics 9, 287-310, (1987).Google Scholar
  17. Mehran, H., “Executive Compensation Structure, Ownership, and Firm Performance.” Journal of Financial Economics 38, 163-184, (1995).Google Scholar
  18. Murphy, K., Executive Compensation. Working paper, University of Southern California, 1998.Google Scholar
  19. Smith, C. and R. Watts, “The Investment Opportunity Set and Corporate Financing, Dividend, and Compensation Policies.” Journal of Financial Economics 32, 263-292, (1992).Google Scholar
  20. White, H., “A Heteroskedasticity-ConsistentCovariance Matrix Estimator and a DirectTest for Heteroskedasticity.” Econometrica 48, 817-838, (1980).Google Scholar
  21. Yermack, D., “Do Corporations Award CEO Stock Options Effectively?” Journal of Financial Economics 39, 237-269, (1995).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Chih-Ying Chen
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Accounting, School of Business and ManagementHong Kong University of Science and TechnologyClear Water Bay, KowloonHong Kong

Personalised recommendations