Two Dimensional Array of Antenna-Coupled Microbolometers

  • F. J. González
  • M. A. Gritz
  • C. Fumeaux
  • G. D. Boreman
Article

Abstract

Antenna-coupled microbolometers are known for having short time constants and high responsivity, but their small dimensions make them unsuitable for imaging applications where a typical pixel area is generally greater than 20 × 20 μm2. In this paper a two dimensional array of antenna-coupled microbolometers is demonstrated as an area receiver. Using the response of microbolometers to visible frequencies a two-dimensional diagnostic scan in the visible was performed on these arrays which allowed measurement of their homogeneity. Frequency response measurements gave time constants around 130 nsec, similar to the ones obtained for single element microbolometers which indicates that a detector of virtually any size can be fabricated without sacrificing time response. Response and noise measurements show lower noise and higher responsivity compared to single element microbolometers. These results make two-dimensional arrays of antenna-coupled microbolometers a promising option for development of pixels in infrared focal plane arrays.

Microbolometer antenna-coupled detector infrared focal plane array 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.
    C. Fumeaux, M. A. Gritz, I. Codreanu, W. L. Schaich, F. J. González, G. D. Boreman, “Measurement of the resonant lengths of infrared dipole antennas”, Infrared Physics & Technology, 41 (2000), pp. 271-281.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bajaj, J., “HgCdTe infrared detectors and focal plane arrays”, Conference on Optoelectronic and Microelectronic Materials Devices, 1998, pp. 23-31.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    C. Fumeaux, J. Alda, G. D. Boreman, “Lithographic antennas at visible frequencies”, Optics Letters, 24(22), 1999, pp. 1629-1631.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    F. J. Gonzalez, C. Fumeaux, J. Alda, G. D. Boreman, “Thermal impedance model of electrostatic discharge effects on microbolometers”, Microwave and Optical Technology Letters, 26(5), 2000, pp. 291-293.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Sedky, S.; Fiorini, P.; Baert, K.; Hermans, L.; Mertens, R., “Characterization and optimization of infrared poly SiGe bolometers”, IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, 46(4), 1999, pp. 675-682.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kruse, P. W., Skatrud, D. D., Uncooled Infrared Imaging Arrays and Systems, Semiconductors and Semimetals vol. 47, Academic Press, 1997.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Nagata, M.; Nagai, J.; Hijikata, K.; Morie, T.; Iwata, A., “Physical design guides for substrate noise reduction in CMOS digital circuits”, IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, 36(3), 2001, pp. 539-549.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Richards, P. L., “Bolometers for infrared and millimeter waves”, J. Appl. Phys. 76(1), 1994, pp. 1-24.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Balanis, C. A., Antenna Theory, Second Edition, John Wiley, 1997.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • F. J. González
    • 1
  • M. A. Gritz
    • 1
  • C. Fumeaux
    • 2
  • G. D. Boreman
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Optics/CREOLUniversity of Central FloridaOrlando
  2. 2.Laboratory for Electromagnetic Fields and Microwave ElectronicsSwiss Federal Institute of Technology, ETH-ZurichZürich

Personalised recommendations