Scientometrics

, Volume 54, Issue 1, pp 31–49 | Cite as

Identity-creators and image-makers: Using citation analysis and thick description to put authors in their place

  • Blaise Cronin
  • Debora Shaw
Article

Abstract

We describe the steps involved in constructing authors" citation identities (whom they cite) and citation images (who cites them). Familiarity with the intellectual, social, and institutional connections of these authors over time helps inform the analysis and augment the specificity of citation counts. Our study shows that authors" writing and referencing styles constitute a form of watermark for their scholarly output.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bazerman, C. (1988), Shaping Written Knowledge: the Genre and Activity of the Experimental Article in Science Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
  2. Borgman, C. L., Furner, J. (2002), Scholarly communication and bibliometrics. In: Cronin, B. (Ed.), Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 36, pp. 3-72. Medford, NJ: Information Today Inc./ASIST.Google Scholar
  3. Cronin, B. (1982), Invisible colleges and information transfer: a review and commentary with particular reference to the social sciences, Journal of Documentation, 38 (3): 212-236.Google Scholar
  4. Cronin, B. (1995), The Scholar's Courtesy: the Role of Acknowledgement in the Primary Communication Process London: Taylor Graham.Google Scholar
  5. Cronin, B., Snyder, H., Atkins, H. (1997), Comparative citation rankings of authors in monographic and journal literature: a study of sociology, Journal of Documentation, 53 (3): 263-273.Google Scholar
  6. Davenport, E., Snyder, H. (1995), Who cites women? Whom do women cite?: an exploration of gender and scholarly citation in sociology, Journal of Documentation, 51 (4): 404-410.Google Scholar
  7. David, P. A. (1998), Communication norms and the collective cognitive performance of “invisible colleges.” In: Barba Navaretti, G., Dasgupta, P., Maler, K.-G., Siniscalco, D. (Eds), Creation and Transfer of Knowledge: Institutions and Incentives Berlin: Springer, 115-163.Google Scholar
  8. Geertz, C. (1973), Thick description; toward an interpretative theory of culture. In: The Interpretation of Culture. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  9. Hyland, K. (2000), Disciplinary Discourses: Social Interactions in Academic Writing Harlow: Pearson.Google Scholar
  10. Mendenhall, T. C. (1887), The characteristic curves of composition, Science, IX (214) (Supplement), 237-249.Google Scholar
  11. Moravcsik, M. J. (1988), Citation context classification of a citation classic concerning citation context classification, Social Studies of Science, 18: 515-521.Google Scholar
  12. Moravcsik, M. J., Murugesan, P. (1975), Some results on the function and quality of citations, Social Studies of Science, 5: 86-92.Google Scholar
  13. White, H. D. (2000), Toward ego-centered citation analysis. In: Cronin, B., Atkins, H. B. (Eds), The Web of Knowledge: A Festschrift in Honor of Eugene Garfield Medford, NJ: Information Today, Inc. ASIS Monograph Series, pp. 475-496.Google Scholar
  14. White, H. D. (2001), Authors as citers over time, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 52 (2): 87-108.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Blaise Cronin
    • 1
  • Debora Shaw
    • 2
  1. 1.Bloomington School of Library and Information Science, Library 011 Indiana University School of Library and Information ScienceIndiana UniversityBloomingtonUSA
  2. 2.Indiana UniversityBloomington

Personalised recommendations