Theory and Decision

, Volume 52, Issue 2, pp 101–125 | Cite as

The effect of context variables on cognitive effort in multiattribute binary choice

  • S. Iglesias-Parro
  • E.I. De la Fuente
  • A.R. Ortega
Article

Abstract

This article reports an empirical investigation of the cognitive effort required to decide in multiattribute binary choice using a variation of the Additive Difference strategy. In contrast with other studies, this paper focuses on the effect of various context variables (rather than task variables) on cognitive effort. In order to select the context variables to be manipulated, we used the model proposed by Shugan (1980; J. Consumer Res. 75 (1980) 99). Our results indicate that there is a positive relationship between the cognitive effort required to decide and the mean of the differences between the dimensions of the choice alternatives. We have also found an inverse relationship between cognitive effort and the variance of the differences between the dimensions of the choice alternatives. Finally, we have found that in negative correlation contexts the effort needed to decide is greater than in positive and null correlation contexts.

Decision making context variables cognitive effort decision strategies 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alloy, L.B. and Tabachnik, N. (1984), Assessment of covariation by humans and animals: the joint influence of prior expectations and current situational information. Psychological Review 91: 112–149.Google Scholar
  2. Aschenbrenner, K.M., Albert, D. and Schmalhofer, F. (1986), Stochastic choice heuristics. Acta Psychologica 56:153–166.Google Scholar
  3. Beach, L.R. and Mitchell, T.R. (1998), A contingency model for the selection of decision strategies. In L.R. Beach (Ed.). Image Theory: Theoretical and Empirical Foundations. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  4. Bettman, J.R. and Kakkar, P. (1977). Effects of information presentation format on consumer information acquisition strategies. Journal of Consumer Research 3:233–240.Google Scholar
  5. Bettman, J.R. and Zins, M.A. (1977). Constructive processes in consumer choice. Journal of Consumer Research 4: 75–85.Google Scholar
  6. Bettman, J.R., Johnson, E.J. and Payne, J.W. (1998), Constructive consumer choice processes. Journal of Consumer Research 25: 187–217.Google Scholar
  7. Bettman, J.R., Johnson, E.J. and Payne, J.W. (1990), A componential analysis of cognitive effort in choice. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 45:111–139.Google Scholar
  8. Bettman, J.R., Johnson, E.J., Luce, M.F. and Payne, J.W. (1993), Correlation, conflict, and choice. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 19:931–951.Google Scholar
  9. Bockenholt, U., Albert, D., Aschenbrenner, M. and Schmalhofer, F. (1991), The effects of attractiveness, dominance, and attribute differences on information ac-quisition in multiattribute binary choice. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 49:258–281.Google Scholar
  10. Einhorn, H.J. and Hogarth, R.M. (1981), Behavioral decision theory: processes of judgment and choice. Annual Review of Psychology 32: 53–88.Google Scholar
  11. Ford, J.K., Schmitt, N., Schechtman, S.L., Hults, B.M. and Doherty, M.L. (1989), Process tracing methods: contributions, problems, and neglected re-search questions. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 43: 75–117.Google Scholar
  12. Huber, O. (1980), The influence of some task variables on cognitive operations in an information-processing decision model. Acta Psychologica 45:187–196.Google Scholar
  13. Huber, J. and Klein, N.M. (1991), Adapting cutoffs to the choice environment: the effects of attribute correlation and reliability. Journal of Consumer Research 18: 346–357.Google Scholar
  14. Iglesias-Parro, S., De la Fuente, E.I. and Ortega, A.R. (1999), Descriptive models and strategies on decision making. Boletín de Psicología 64: 7–30.Google Scholar
  15. Iglesias-Parro, S., Ortega, A.R., De la Fuente, E.I. and Martín, I. (2001). Context variables as cognitive effort modulators in decision making using an alternative-based processing strategy. Quality and Quantity, 35,311–323.Google Scholar
  16. Johnson, E.J., Payne, J.W. and Bettman, J.R. (1988), Information displays and preference reversals. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Process 42: 1–21.Google Scholar
  17. Johnson, E.J., Meyer, R.J. and Ghose, S. (1989), When choice models fail: com-pensatory representations in negatively correlated environments. Journal of Marketing Research 26:255–270.Google Scholar
  18. Johnson, E.J., Payne, J.W., Schkade, D.A. and Bettman, J.R. (1991), Monitor-ing information processing and decisions: the Mouselab system. Unpublished manuscript, Center for Decision Studies, Fuqua School of Business, Duke University.Google Scholar
  19. Lohse, G.L. and Johnson, E.J. (1996), A comparison of two process tracing meth-ods for choice tasks. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 68: 28–43.Google Scholar
  20. Payne, J.W. (1976), Task complexity and contingent processing in decision mak-ing: an information search and protocol analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 16:366–387.Google Scholar
  21. Payne, J.W. (1982). Contingent decision behavior. Psychological Bulletin, 92: 382–402.Google Scholar
  22. Payne, J.W., Bettman, J.R. and Johnson, E.J. (1990), The adaptative decision maker: effort and accuracy in choice. In R.M. Hogarth (Ed.), Insights in De-cision Making: A Tribute to Hillel J. Einhorn. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  23. Payne, J.W., Bettman, J.R. and Johnson, E.J. (1992), Behavioral decision re-search: A constructive processing perspective. Annual Review of Psychology 43: 87–131.Google Scholar
  24. Payne, J.W., Bettman, J.R. and Johnson, E.J. (1993a), The Adaptative Decision Maker. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Payne, J.W., Bettman, J.R. and Johnson, E.J. (1993b), The use of multiple strategies in judgment and choice. In Castellan, N. (Ed.), Individual and group decision making: Current issues. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  26. Payne, J.W., Bettman, J.R. and Luce, M.F. (1996), When time is money: decision behavior under opportunity-cost time pressure. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 66:131–152.Google Scholar
  27. Payne, J.W., Bettman, J.R. and Luce, M.F. (1998), Behavioral decision research: an overview. In M.H. Birnbaum (Ed.). Measurement, Judgment, and Decision Making. Handbook of Perception and Cognition (2nd ed). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  28. Pitz, G.F. and Sachs, N.J. (1984), Judgment and decision: theory and application. Annual Review of Psychology 35:139–163.Google Scholar
  29. Russo, J.E. and Dosher, B.A. (1983), Strategies for multiattribute binary choice. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 9:676–696.Google Scholar
  30. Russo, J.E., Staelin, R., Nolan, C.A., Russell, G.J. and Metcalf, B.L. (1986), Nutrition information in the supermarket. Journal of Consumer Research 13: 48–70.Google Scholar
  31. Schkade, D.A. and Kleinmuntz, D.N. (1994), Information displays and choice processes: differential effects of organization, form, and sequence. Organiza-tional Behavior and Human Decision Processes 57:319–337.Google Scholar
  32. Seggie, I. (1987), The judgement of covariation between binary variables: some conditions that influence the process. Memory and Cognition 15:341–348.Google Scholar
  33. Shugan, S.M. (1980), The cost of thinking. Journal of Consumer Research 75: 99–111.Google Scholar
  34. Stone, D.N. and Schkade, D.A. (1991). Numeric and linguistic information presentation in multiattribute choice. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 49: 42–59.Google Scholar
  35. Stone, D.N. and Schkade, D.A. (1994). Effects of attribute scales on process and performance in multiattribute choice. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 59:261–287.Google Scholar
  36. Sundström, G.A. (1987), Information search and decision making: The effects of information displays. Acta Psychologica 65:165–179.Google Scholar
  37. Trolier, T.K. and Hamilton, D.L. (1986), Variables influencing judgements of cor-relational relations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 50:879–888.Google Scholar
  38. Tversky, A. (1969), Intransitivity of preferences. Psychological Review 76: 31–48.Google Scholar
  39. Tversky, A. (1972), Elimination by aspects: A theory of choice. Psychological Review 79:281–299.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. Iglesias-Parro
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  • E.I. De la Fuente
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  • A.R. Ortega
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of JaéSpain
  2. 2.Facultad de Humanidades y CC.EE.Universidad de JaénJaénSpain
  3. 3.Department of Social Psychology and Methodology of Behavioral SciencesUniversity of GranadaGranadaSpain

Personalised recommendations