Conditioning Capacities and Choquet Integrals: The Role of Comonotony
Choquet integrals and capacities play a crucial role in modern decision theory. Comonotony is a central concept for these theories because the main property of a Choquet integral is its additivity for comonotone functions. We consider a Choquet integral representation of preferences showing uncertainty aversion (pessimism) and propose axioms on time consistency which yield a candidate for conditional Choquet integrals. An other axiom characterizes the role of comonotony in the use of information. We obtain two conditioning rules for capacities which amount to the well-known Bayes' and Dempster–Schafer's updating rules. We are allowed to interpret both of them as a lack of confidence in information in a dynamic extension of pessimism.
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Chateauneuf, A. (1994),Modeling attitudes towards uncertainty and risk through the use of Choquet integral, Annals of Operation Research 52, 3-20.Google Scholar
- Chateauneuf, A., Cohen, M. and Kast, R. (1997), Comonotone random variables in economics: A review of some results, DT GREQAM 97A07.Google Scholar
- Cohen, M., Gilboa, I., Jaffray, J-Y. and Schmeidler, D. (1997), An experimental study of updating ambiguous beliefs, 1st ISIPTA proceedings, Ghent, Belgium.Google Scholar
- Denneberg D. (1994), Non Additive Measures and Integrals. Dordrecht/ Boston/London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
- Kast, R. and Lapied, A. (1997), A decision theoretic approach to bid-ask spreads, Finance 18, 115-137.Google Scholar