Advertisement

Water, Air, and Soil Pollution

, Volume 138, Issue 1–4, pp 181–197 | Cite as

Geographic Techniques and Recent Applications of Remote Sensing to Landscape-Water Quality Studies

  • Jerry A. Griffith
Article

Abstract

This article overviews recent advances in studies of landscape-water quality relationships using remote sensing techniques. With the increasing feasibility of using remotely-sensed data, landscape-water quality studies can nowbe more easily performed on regional, multi-state scales. Thetraditional method of relating land use and land cover to waterquality has been extended to include landscape pattern and otherlandscape information derived from satellite data. Three itemsare focused on in this article: 1) the increasing recognition ofthe importance of larger-scale studies of regional water qualitythat require a landscape perspective; 2) the increasingimportance of remotely sensed data, such as the imagery-derivednormalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) and vegetationphenological metrics derived from time-series NDVI data; and 3) landscape pattern. In some studies, using landscape patternmetrics explained some of the variation in water quality notexplained by land use/cover. However, in some other studies, theNDVI metrics were even more highly correlated to certain waterquality parameters than either landscape pattern metrics or landuse/cover proportions. Although studies relating landscape pattern metrics to water quality have had mixed results, thisrecent body of work applying these landscape measures andsatellite-derived metrics to water quality analysis hasdemonstrated their potential usefulness in monitoring watershedconditions across large regions.

ecological monitoring landscape ecology landscape-water quality studies NDVI remote sensing/GIS stream water quality 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ackleson, S. and Klemas, V.: 1987, 'Remote sensing of submerged aquatic vegetation in lower Chesapeake Bay: a comparison of Landsat MSS to TM Imagery', Rem. Sens. Environ. 22, 235–248.Google Scholar
  2. Allan, J., Erickson, D. and Fay, J.: 1997, 'The influence of catchment land use on stream integrity across multiple scales', Fresh. Biol. 37, 149–161.Google Scholar
  3. Basnyat, P., Teeter, L., Flynn, K. and Lockaby, B.: 1999, 'Relationships between landscape characteristics and nonpoint source pollution inputs to coastal estuaries', Environ. Manage. 23(4), 539–549.Google Scholar
  4. Bolgrien, D., Granin, N. and Levin, L.: 1995, 'Surface temperature dynamics of Lake Baikal observed from AVHRR images', Photogramm. Eng. Rem. Sens. 61, 211–216.Google Scholar
  5. Bolstad, P. and Swank, W.: 1997, 'Cumulative impacts of landuse on water quality in a southern Appalachian watershed', J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc. 33(3), 519–533.Google Scholar
  6. Boulton, A.: 1999, 'An overview of river health assessment: philosophies, practice, problems and prognosis', Fresh. Biol. 41, 469–479.Google Scholar
  7. Box, E., Holben, B. and Kalb, V.: 1989, 'Accuracy of the AVHRR Vegetation Index as a predictor of biomass, primary productivity and net CO2 flux', Vegetatio 80, 71–89.Google Scholar
  8. Cain, D., Riitters, K. and Orvis, K.: 1997, 'A multi-scale analysis of landscape statistics', Landsc. Ecol. 12, 199–212.Google Scholar
  9. Cairns Jr., J. and Niederlehner, B.: 1996, 'Developing a field of landscape ecotoxicology', Ecol. Appl. 6(3), 790–796.Google Scholar
  10. Carpenter, S., Caraco, N., Correll, D., Howarth, R., Sharpley, A. and Smith, V.: 1998, 'Nonpoint pollution of surface waters with phosphorus and nitrogen', Ecol. Appl. 8(3), 559–568.Google Scholar
  11. EPA: 1994, 'Landscape Monitoring and Assessment Research Plan', EPA 620/R-94/009, Environmental Monitoring Systems Laboratory, Las Vegas, NV, 68 pp.Google Scholar
  12. Fairweather, P.: 1999, 'State of environment indicators of river health: exploring the metaphor', Fresh. Biol. 41, 211–220.Google Scholar
  13. GAO: 2000, 'Water Quality: Key EPA and State Decisions Limited by Inconsistent and Incomplete Data', U.S. General Accounting Office, GAO/RCED-00-54, Washington, D.C., 76 pp.Google Scholar
  14. Gesch, D., Verdin, K. and Greenlee, S.: 1999, 'New land surface digital elevation model covers the earth', EOS, Trans., Am. Geophys. Union 80(6), 69–70.Google Scholar
  15. Goodin, D., Han, L., Fraser, R., Rundquist, D., Stebbins, W. and Schalles, J.: 1993, 'Analysis of suspended solids in water using remotely sensed high resolution derivative spectra', Photogramm. Eng. Rem. Sens. 59, 505–510.Google Scholar
  16. Goward, S., Tucker, C. and Dye, D.: 1985, 'North American vegetation patterns observed with the NOAA-7 Advanced Very High Resolution Radiometer', Vegetatio 64, 3–14.Google Scholar
  17. Griffith, J.: 2000, 'Interrelationships among landscapes, NDVI, and stream water quality in the U.S. Central Plains', Ph.D. Dissertation, Department of Geography, University of Kansas, 222 pp.Google Scholar
  18. Griffith, J.: 1998, 'Connecting ecological monitoring and ecological indicators: a review of the literature', J. Environ. Syst. 26(4), 325–363.Google Scholar
  19. Griffith, J., Martinko, E. and Price, K.: 2000, 'Analyzing the landscape structure of Kansas at three scales', Landsc. Urban Plan. 52(1), 45–61.Google Scholar
  20. Griffith, J., Martinko, E., Whistler, J. and Price, K.: 2002a, 'Relationships among landscape pattern, NDVI and stream water quality in the U.S. Central Plains', J. Environ. Qual. 31, 846–859.Google Scholar
  21. Griffith, J., Martinko, E., Whistler, J., and Price, K.: 2002b, 'An analysis of the interrelationships among landscapes, NDVI and stream conditions in the U.S. Central Plains', Ecol. Appl. (in press).Google Scholar
  22. Gross, M. and Klemas, V.: 1986, 'The use of Airborne Imaging Spectrometer (AIS) data to differentiate marsh vegetation', Rem. Sens. Environ. 19, 97–103.Google Scholar
  23. Gustafson, E.: 1998, 'Quantifying landscape spatial pattern: what is the state-of-the-art?', Ecosystems 1, 143–156.Google Scholar
  24. Hall, K. and Schreier, H.: 1996, 'Urbanization and agricultural intensification in the lower Fraser River Valley: impacts on water use and quality', GeoJournal. 40, 135–146.Google Scholar
  25. Harding Jr., L., Itsweire, E. and Esaias, W.: 1995, 'Algorithm development for recovering chlorophyll concentrations in the Chesapeake Bay using aircraft remote sensing, 1989-1991', Photogramm. Eng. Rem. Sens. 61, 177–186.Google Scholar
  26. Harris, J. and Silveira, R.: 1999, 'Large-scale assessments of river health using an index of biotic integrity with low-wiversity fish communities', Fresh. Biol. 41, 235–252.Google Scholar
  27. He, C., Malcolm, S., Dahlberg, K. and Fu, B.: 2000, 'A conceptual framework for integrating hydrological and biological indicators into watershed management', Landsc. Urban Plan. 49, 25–34.Google Scholar
  28. Heggem, D., Edmonds, C, Neale, A., Bice, L. and Jones, K. B.: 2000, 'A landscape ecology assessment of the Tensas River Basin', Environ. Monit. Assess. 64, 41–54.Google Scholar
  29. Hem, J.: 1985, 'Study and Interpretation of the Chemical Characteristics of Natural Water', United States Geological Survey Water-Supply Paper 2254, Washington, DC, 263 pp.Google Scholar
  30. Herlihy, A., Stoddard, J. and Johnson, C.: 1998, 'The relationship between stream chemistry and watershed land cover data in the mid-Atlantic region', Water, Air, and Soil Pollut. 105(1/2), 377–386.Google Scholar
  31. Hughes, R., Paulsen, S. and Stoddard, J.: 2000, 'EMAP-surface waters: a multi-assemblage, probability survey of ecological integrity in the U.S.A.', Hydrobiologia 422/423, 429–433.Google Scholar
  32. Hunsaker, C. and Levine, D.: 1995, 'Hierarchical approaches to the study of water quality in rivers', Bioscience 45(3), 193–203.Google Scholar
  33. Hunsaker, C., Levine, D., Timmins, S., Jackson, B. and O'Neill, R.: 1992, 'Landscape Characterization for Assessing Regional Water Quality', in D. McKenzie, D. Hyatt, and J. McDonald (eds), Ecological Indicators, Elsevier, Essex, England, pp. 997–1006.Google Scholar
  34. Hunsaker, C. and Carpenter, D.: 1990, 'Ecological Indicators for the Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Program', EPA 600/3-90/060, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research Development. Research, Triangle Park, NC.Google Scholar
  35. Jensen, J.: 1996, Introductory Digital Image Processing, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 316 pp.Google Scholar
  36. Jensen, J., Hodgsen, M., Christensen, E., Mackey, H., Tinney, L. and Sharitz, R.: 1986, 'Remote sensing of inland wetlands: a multispectral approach', Rem. Sens. Environ. 26, 161–170.Google Scholar
  37. Jensen, J., Ramsay, E., Mackay, H., Christensen, E. and Sharitz, R.: 1987, 'Inland wetland change detection using aircraft MSS data', Photogramm. Eng. Rem. Sens. 53(5), 521–529.Google Scholar
  38. Jensen, S.: 1993, 'Applications of Hydrologic Information Automatically Extracted from Digital Elevation Models', in K. Beven and I. Moore (eds), Terrain Analysis and Distributed Modeling in Hydrology, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, pp. 35–48.Google Scholar
  39. Johnson, L. and S. Gage.: 1997, 'Landscape approaches to the analysis of aquatic ecosystems', Fresh. Biol. 37, 113–132.Google Scholar
  40. Johnson, L., Richards, C., Host, G. and Arthur, J.: 1997, 'Landscape influences on water chemistry in midwestern stream ecosystems', Fresh. Biol. 37, 193–208.Google Scholar
  41. Jolly, I., Caitcheon, G., Donnely, T. and Hafner, S.: 1996, 'Physical and Chemical Indicators of Water Quality', in J. Walker and D. Reuter (eds), Indicators of Catchment Health, CSIRO Publishing, Melbourne, Australia, pp. 131–141.Google Scholar
  42. Jones, K. B., Heggem, D., Wade, T., Neale, A., Ebert, D., Nash, M., Mehaffey, M., Hermann, K., Selle, A., Augustine, S., Goodman, I., Pederson, J., Bolgrien, D., Viger, J., Chiang, D., Lin, C., Zhong, Y., Baker, J. and Van Remortel, R.: 2000, 'Assessing landscape condition relative to water resources in the western United States: a strategic approach', Environ. Monit. Assess. 64, 227–245.Google Scholar
  43. Jones, K. B., Riitters, K., Wickham, J., Tankersley Jr., R., O'Neill, R., Chaloud, D., Smith, E. and Neale, A.: 1997, 'An Ecological Assessment of the United States Mid-Atlantic Region: A Landscape Atlas', U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, EPA/600/R-97/130, Office of Research and Development, Washington, D.C., 105 pp.Google Scholar
  44. Jones, K. B., Walker, J., Riitters, K., Wickham, J. and Nicoll, C.: 1996, 'Indicators of Landscape Integrity', in J. Walker and D. Reuter (eds), Indicators of Catchment Health, CSIRO Publishing, Melbourne, Australia, pp. 155–168.Google Scholar
  45. Jupp, D., Kirk, J. and Harris, G.: 1994, 'Detection, identification and mapping of cyanobacteria: using remote sensing to measure the optical quality of turbid inland waters', Aust. J. Mar. Fresh. Res. 45, 801–828.Google Scholar
  46. Karr, J.: 1999, 'Defining and measuring river health', Fresh. Biol. 41, 221–234.Google Scholar
  47. Karr, J. and Schlosser, I.: 1978, 'Water resources and the land-water interface', Science 201, 229–234.Google Scholar
  48. Keeney, D. and DeLuca, T.: 1993, 'Des Moines river nitrate in relation to watershed agricultural practices: 1945 versus 1980s', J. Environ. Qual. 22, 267–272Google Scholar
  49. Kelly, J. and Harwell, M.: 1990, 'Indicators of ecosystem recovery', Environ. Manage. 14(5), 527–545.Google Scholar
  50. Kirk, J.: 1988, 'Optical water quality: what does it mean and how should we measure it?', J. Water Pollut. Control Fed. 60, 194–197.Google Scholar
  51. Kolpin, D.: 1997, 'Agricultural chemicals in groundwater of the midwestern United States: relations to land use', J. Environ. Qual. 26, 1025–1037.Google Scholar
  52. Lathrop, R. and Lillesand, T.: 1989, 'Monitoring water quality and river plume transport in Green Bay, Lake Michigan with SPOT-1 imagery', Photogramm. Eng. Rem. Sens. 51, 329–341.Google Scholar
  53. Lathrop, R. and Lillesand, T.: 1986, 'Use of thematic mapper data to assess water quality in Green Bay and Central Lake, Michigan', Photogramm. Eng. Rem. Sens. 52, 671–680.Google Scholar
  54. Lee, R.: 1999, 'Modeling Corn Yields in Iowa Using Time-series Analysis of AVHRR Data and Vegetation Phenological Metrics', Ph.D. Dissertation, Department of Geography, University of Kansas, 164 pp.Google Scholar
  55. Liedtke, J., Roberts, A., and Luternauer, J.: 1995, 'Practical remote sensing of suspended sediment concentrations', Photogramm. Eng. Rem. Sens. 61, 167–176.Google Scholar
  56. Lillisand, T., Johnson, W., Devell, Lindstrom, O. and Meisner, D.: 1983, 'Use of Landsat data to predict the trophic state of Minnesota Lakes', Photogramm. Eng. Rem. Sens. 49, 219–229.Google Scholar
  57. Loague, K.: 1998, 'The challenge of predicting nonpoint source pollution', Environ. Sci. Technol. 32(5), 130A.Google Scholar
  58. Loveland, T., Merchant, J., Brown, J., Ohlen, D., Reed, B., Olson, P. and Hutchinson, T.: 1995, 'Seasonal land-cover regions of the United States', Ann. Assoc. Am. Geogr. 85(2), 339–355.Google Scholar
  59. Lowrance, R., Leonard, R. and Sheridan, J.: 1985, 'Managing riparian ecosystems to control nonpoint pollution', J. Soil Water Conserv. 40, 87–91.Google Scholar
  60. Malleswara, T., Rao, K, Kuma, A., Rao, R. and Deepshatula, B.: 1996, 'Digital terrain models from indian remote sensing satellite data from the overlap of two adjacent paths using digital photogrammetric techniques', Photogramm. Eng. Rem. Sens. 62, 726–731.Google Scholar
  61. Matson, P., Parton, J., Power, A. and Swift, M.: 1997, 'Agricultural intensification and ecosystem properties', Science 277, 504–509.Google Scholar
  62. McGarigal, K. and Marks, B.: 1995, 'FRAGSTATS: Spatial Pattern Analysis Program for Quantifying Landscape Structure', USDA Forest Service General Technical Report PNW-GTR-351, Pacific Northwest Research Station, Portland, OR, 122 pp.Google Scholar
  63. Messer, J., Linthurst, R. and Overton, W.: 1991, 'An EPA program for monitoring ecological status and trends', Environ. Monit. Assess. 17(1), 67–78.Google Scholar
  64. Moore, I., Grayson, R. and Ladson, A.: 1993, 'Digital Terrain Modelling: A Review of Hydrological, Geomorphological, and Biological Applications', in K. Beven and I. Moore (eds), Terrain Analysis and Distributed Modeling in Hydrology, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, pp. 1–34.Google Scholar
  65. Moss, M.: 1999, 'Fostering Academic and Institutional Activities in Landscape Ecology', in J. Wiens and M. Moss (eds), Issues in Landscape Ecology, International Association for Landscape Ecology, Pioneer Press of Greely, Inc., Greely, Colorado, pp. 138–144.Google Scholar
  66. Munn, R.: 1988, 'The design of integrated monitoring systems to provide early indications of environmental/ecological changes', Environ. Monit. Assess. 11, 203–217.Google Scholar
  67. Omernik, J., Abernathy, A. and Male, L.: 1981, 'Stream nutrient levels and proximity of agricultural and forest land to streams: some relationships', J. Soil Water Conserv. 36, 227–231.Google Scholar
  68. Omernik, J.: 1976, 'The influence of land use on stream nutrient levels', EPA-600/3-88/037, 106 pp.Google Scholar
  69. O'Neill, R., Hunsaker, C., Jones, K., Riitters, K., Wickham, J., Schwartz, P., Goodman, I., Jackson, B. and Baillargeon, W.: 1997, 'Monitoring environmental quality at the landscape scale', Bioscience 47(8), 513–519.Google Scholar
  70. O'Neill, R., Hunsaker, C., Timmins, T., Jackson, B., Jones, K., Riitters, K. and Wickham, J.: 1996, 'Scale problems in reporting landscape pattern at the regional scale', Landsc. Ecol. 113, 169–180.Google Scholar
  71. O'Neill, R., Krummel, J., Gardner, R., Sugihara, G., Jackson, B., DeAngelis, D., Milne, B., Zygmunt, B., Christensen, S., Dale, V. and Graham, R.: 1988, 'Indices of landscape pattern', Landsc. Ecol. 1, 153–162.Google Scholar
  72. Osborne, L. and Wiley, M.: 1988, 'Empirical relationships between land use/cover patterns and stream water quality in an agricultural catchment', J. Environ. Manage. 26, 9–27.Google Scholar
  73. Paruelo, J. and Lauenroth, W.: 1995, 'Regional patterns of normalized difference vegetation index in North American shrublands and grasslands', Ecology 76, 1888–1898.Google Scholar
  74. Peterjohn, W. and Corel, D.: 1984, 'Nutrient dynamics in an agricultural catchment: observations on the role of riparian forest', Ecology 65, 1466–1475.Google Scholar
  75. Polidori, L.: 1991, 'Digital Terrain Models from Radar Images: A Review', in Proceedings of the International Symposium on Radar and Lidars in Earth And Planetary Sciences, Cannes, France, September 1991, pp. 141–146.Google Scholar
  76. Qi, Y. and Wu, J.: 1996, 'Effects of changing spatial resolution on the results of landscape pattern analysis using spatial autocorrelation indices', Landsc. Ecol. 11(1), 39–49.Google Scholar
  77. Rapport, D.: 1992, 'Evaluating ecosystem health', J. Aquat. Ecosyst. Health 1(1), 15–24.Google Scholar
  78. Reed, B., Brown, J., VanderZee, D., Loveland, T., Merchant, J. and Ohlen, D.: 1994, 'Measuring phenological variability from satellite imagery', J. Veg. Sci. 5, 703–714.Google Scholar
  79. Richards, C., Johnson, L. and Host, G.: 1996, 'Landscape-scale influences on stream habitat and biota', Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 53(1), 295–311.Google Scholar
  80. Risser, P., Karr, J. and Forman, R.: 1984, 'Landscape Ecology: Directions and Approaches', Special Publication #2, Illinois Natural History Survey.Google Scholar
  81. Roth, N. E., Allan, J. D. and Ericson, D. E.: 1996, 'Landscape influences on stream biotic integrity assessed at multiple spatial scales', Landsc. Ecol. 11(3), 141–156.Google Scholar
  82. Ruiz-Azuara, P.: 1995, 'Multitemporal analysis of 'simultaneous' Landsat Imagery (MSS and TM) for monitoring primary production in a small tropical coastal lagoon', Photogramm. Eng. Rem. Sens. 61, 187–198.Google Scholar
  83. Rundquist, B., Harrington, J. and Goodin, D.: 2000, 'Mesoscale satellite bioclimatology', Prof. Geogr. 52(2), 331–344.Google Scholar
  84. Rundquist, D., Han, L., Schalles, J. and Peake, J.: 1996, 'Remote measurement of algal chlorophyll in surface waters: the case for the first derivative of reflectance near 690 nm', Photogramm. Eng. Rem. Sens. 62, 195–200.Google Scholar
  85. Samson, S.: 1993, 'Two indices to characterize temporal patterns in the spectral response of vegetation', Photogramm. Eng. Rem. Sens. 59(4), 511–517.Google Scholar
  86. Schlosser, I.: 1991, 'Stream fish ecology: a landscape perspective', Bioscience 41(10), 704–712.Google Scholar
  87. Schlosser, I. and Karr, J.: 1981, 'Water quality in agricultural catchments: impact of riparian vegetation during base flow', Water Resour. Bull. 17, 233–240.Google Scholar
  88. Senay, G. B. and Elliott, R.L.: 2000, 'Combining AVHRR-NDVI and land use data to describe temporal and spatial dynamics of vegetation', For. Ecol. Manage. 128, 83–91.Google Scholar
  89. Sharpe, J.: 1994, 'Assessing the Relationship Between Thematic Mapper-Derived Landscape Structure and Pollutant Estimates From a Nonpoint Source Pollution Model', M.A. Thesis, Department of Geography, University of Nebraska, 79 pp.Google Scholar
  90. Sharpley, A. and Meyer, M.: 1994, 'Minimizing agricultural nonpoint-source impacts: a symposium overview', J. Environ. Qual. 23(1), 1–13.Google Scholar
  91. Spanner, M., Pierce, L., Running, S. and Peterson, D.: 1990, 'The seasonality of AVHRR data of temperate coniferous forests: relationship with leaf area index', Rem. Sens. Environ. 33, 97–112.Google Scholar
  92. Stoms, D. and Estes, J.: 1993, 'A remote sensing research agenda for mapping and monitoring biodiversity', Int. J. Rem. Sens. 14(10), 1839–1860.Google Scholar
  93. Stoms, D. and Hargrove, W.: 2000, 'Potential NDVI as a baseline for monitoring ecosystem functioning', Int. J. Rem. Sens. 21(2), 401–407.Google Scholar
  94. Swanson, F., Krantz, T., Caine, N. and Woodmansee, R.: 1988, 'Landform effects on ecosystem patterns and processes', Bioscience 38, 92–98.Google Scholar
  95. Tieszen, L., Reed., B., Bliss, N., Wylie, B. and Dejong, D.: 1997, 'NDVI C3 and C4 production, and distributions in Great Plains grassland cover classes', Ecol. Appl. 7, 59–78Google Scholar
  96. Townsend, C. and Riley, R.: 1999, 'Assessment of river health: accounting for perturbation pathways in physical and ecological space', Fresh. Biol. 41, 393–405.Google Scholar
  97. Townsend, C., Crowl., T., Arbuckle, C. and Scarsbrook, M.: 1997, 'The relationship between land use and physicochemistry, food resources, and macroinvertebrate communities in tributaries of the Taieri River, New Zealand: a hierarchically scaled approach', Fresh. Biol. 37, 177–192.Google Scholar
  98. Tucker, C., Vanpraet, C., Boerwinkle, E. and Gaston, G.: 1983, 'Satellite remote sensing of total dry matter production in the Senegalese Sahel', Rem. Sens. Environ. 13, 461–474.Google Scholar
  99. Turner, M.: 1989, 'Landscape ecology: the effect of pattern on process', Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 20, 171–197.Google Scholar
  100. Turner, M.: 1990, 'Spatial and temporal analysis of landscape patterns', Landsc. Ecol. 4(1), 21–30.Google Scholar
  101. Turner, M. and Carpenter, S.: 1998, 'At last: a journal devoted to ecosystems', Ecosystems 1(1), 1–4.Google Scholar
  102. Urban, D., O'Neill, R. and Shugart, H.: 1987, 'Landscape ecology', Bioscience 37, 119–127.Google Scholar
  103. U.S.G.S. (United States Geological Survey): 1999, National Elevation Dataset Fact Sheet 148-99. Washington, DC. http://mac.usgs.gov/mac/isb/pubs/factsheets/fs14899.htmlGoogle Scholar
  104. Wear, D., Turner, M. and Naiman, R.: 1998, 'Land cover along an urban-rural gradient: implications for water quality', Ecol. Appl. 8(3), 619–630.Google Scholar
  105. Wells, H.: 1992, 'Pollution prevention', Pollut. Eng. 24, 23–25.Google Scholar
  106. Whistler, J.: 1996, 'A Phenological Approach To Land Cover Characterization Using Landsat MSS Data For Analysis Of Nonpoint Source Pollution', KARS Report No. 96-1, Kansas Applied Remote Sensing Program, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS, 51 pp.Google Scholar
  107. Whittier, T. and Paulsen, S.: 1992, 'The surface water component of the environmental monitoring and assessment program: an overview', J. Aquat. Ecosyst. Health 2(1), 1–12.Google Scholar
  108. Wichert, G. and Rapport, D.: 1998, 'Fish community structure as a measure of degradation and rehabilitation of riparian systems in an agricultural drainage basin', Environ. Manage. 22(3), 425–443.Google Scholar
  109. Wickham, J., Jones, K. B., Riitters, K., O'Neill, R., Tankersley, R., Smith, R., Neale, A. and Chaloud, D.: 1999, 'An integrated environmental assessment of the US Mid-Atlantic Region', Environ. Manage. 24, 553–560.Google Scholar
  110. Wiley, M., Kohler, S. and Seelbach, P.: 1997, 'Reconciling landscape and local views of aquatic communities: lessons from Michigan trout streams', Fresh. Biol. 37, 133–148.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jerry A. Griffith
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of GeographyUniversity of Southern MississippiHattiesburgU.S.A

Personalised recommendations